Hi,
Very interesting indeed. I didn't notice.
I wouldn't claim that, by definition, it is more safe than mpi4py (just
another wrapper) but it would remove that dependency.
I wonder if a simple replacement of mpi4py.comm by boost.mpi.comm would
do the trick. If they followed same naming
Hi Bruno,
There is a boost::mpi library built on top of OpenMPI, MPICH2, IntelMPI [0].
In the introduction [1] they say it's just a wrapper for OpenMPI,
MPICH2 and IntelMPI. By using boost you could have some extra safety.
Example [2]:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
mpi::environment
2 matches
Mail list logo
