Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:42:08 +0100)
> Wow, thanks a ton for clarifying. Recently I was wondering why dragging
> with mouse did not work like before... I'll check.
OK, great! Please push the fix to
https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/-/merge_requests/438
:-))
Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:13:47 +0100)
> Do you mean to reformat the whole repository?
yes, exactly. Sorry for so many merge requests (again). This time I
was thinking that maybe someone was working in ./core and not in ./lib
directory. Maybe I should have done
Wow, thanks a ton for clarifying. Recently I was wondering why dragging
with mouse did not work like before... I'll check.
Thanks
Bruno
Le mar. 10 mars. 2020 20:28, Janek Kozicki (yade)
a écrit :
> Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:10:24 +0100)
> > That's what puzzled
Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:10:24 +0100)
> That's what puzzled me in the first place. So deeply that I didn't dare
> replying to the question. :)
Ah sorry, here's exactly what I meant:
qt5/GLViewer.cpp, function postSelection() was written by Anton in 2015-06-26
To: Yade developers
Subject: Re: [Yade-dev] should we drop qt4 support? + clang-format ?
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 23:28, Janek Kozicki (yade)
mailto:jkozicki-y...@pg.edu.pl>> wrote:
Since I have finished all the large modifications in master I thought about
clang-formatting it.
But maybe somebod
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 23:28, Janek Kozicki (yade)
wrote:
>
> Since I have finished all the large modifications in master I thought
> about clang-formatting it.
> But maybe somebody else has some ongoing large changes and prefers to wait
> with this?
>
Hi,
Do you mean to reformat the whole
Hi there,
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 21:53, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
> > If we decided to remove qt4, then we need to decide which version of
> > GLViewer::postSelection(…)
>
> If we drop qt4 directory completely, then we will have only qt5-version
> of this method, right?
>
That's what puzzled me in
Anton Gladky said: (by the date of Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:54:04 +0100)
> If we drop qt4 directory completely, then we will have only qt5-version
> of this method, right?
Oh, right. And it was used for a long time, so it must be good :)
I have just updated that merge request and removed qt4
Hello Janek,
I think it is a time already to drop qt4 support completely.
> If we decided to remove qt4, then we need to decide which version of
> GLViewer::postSelection(…)
If we drop qt4 directory completely, then we will have only qt5-version
of this method, right?
Regards
Anton
Am So.,
If we decided to remove qt4, then we need to decide which version of
GLViewer::postSelection(…) to use, because `meld gui/qt4 gui/qt5`
shows that this function is the only one that differs between the two
directories.
Janek Kozicki (yade) said: (by the date of Sun, 8 Mar 2020 22:54:07
These last two merge requests have duplicate changes in both directories.
The changes are identical, because I did
git diff --staged > /tmp/z.patch
# edit file, replace qt5 with qt5
patch -p1 < /tmp/z.patch
but having two copies of same stuff isn't healthy. Does anyone still use qt4?
best
11 matches
Mail list logo
