Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-05 Thread Robert Caulk
It’s ok to merge that full commit including flowboundingsphere. I will make a new merge request with the periodic insertion images. Le mar. 5 févr. 2019 à 19:15, Janek Kozicki <1814...@bugs.launchpad.net> a écrit : > I think rebasing will work now :) Unless Robert will happen to have a >

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-05 Thread Janek Kozicki
aah, so it's entire preamble. No wonder that my simple \newcommand replacement did not work. Congrats on finding this! :) -- Janek Kozicki -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade developers, which is subscribed to Yade. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-04 Thread Janek Kozicki
Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:39:36 -) > It sounds like the pragmatic move is to replace the macros by what they mean. Search & replace should work, and I think there are very few pages where those macros are used (if not just one page). I've seen an error not

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-04 Thread Janek Kozicki
Robert Caulk said: (by the date of Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:07:16 -) > Have you tried replacing \def with \newcommand locally Janek? yes, it did not help. -- Janek Kozicki -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade developers, which is subscribed to Yade.

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-04 Thread Anton Gladky
Sorry for causing those problems. Yes, I did not check this change on older distributions. Anyway, the pngmath is deprecated in sphinx_1.8, so this change is necessary for the newer distributions, where 1.8 is used. If imgmath is not working properly, we need to investigate the problem deeper.

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-04 Thread Janek Kozicki
Anton Gladky said: (by the date of Fri, 01 Feb 2019 17:46:29 -) > I committed those changes. pngmath is not part of sphinx any more, > so the change is really necessary Hmm, this search in Buster indicates that pngmath is still there, am I missing something?

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-01 Thread Janek Kozicki
Right of course. I am doing this right now every 15 minutes, and I forgot to tell Robert about that ;) There is also `make doc/fast` but I didn't notice any difference. Chareyre said: (by the date of Fri, 01 Feb 2019 19:25:57 -) > This is not website-related. You can simply «make doc»

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-01 Thread Chareyre
This is not website-related. You can simply «make doc» locally and check html output. It is a good opportunity to play with gitlab pipeline, still, but it will also imply ~8min of full recompile time... B Le ven. 1 févr. 2019 18:20, Robert Caulk <1814...@bugs.launchpad.net> a écrit : > Yes,

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-01 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi guys, I committed those changes. pngmath is not part of sphinx any more, so the change is really necessary Anton Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 18:25 Uhr schrieb Robert Caulk <1814...@bugs.launchpad.net>: > > Yes, Mathjax seems cleaner. Does it result in better resolution of math > on the web.

Re: [Yade-dev] [Bug 1814286] Re: Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation

2019-02-01 Thread Janek Kozicki
> Is there a way to test changes and their effect on the website without > merging to develop branch? Yes, a merge request performs a build, then you can click "artifacts" in the finished build, and then click "browse". So you can examine output before approving the MR. Good find, thanks. if I