Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-05-30 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment: computePoreBodyRadius was implemented by Thomas Sweijen for two-phase flow and (I guess) it includes some pore merging as described in [1]. The minimum radius could be

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-05-30 Thread Launchpad Janitor
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Open => Expired Launchpad Janitor expired the question: This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days. -- You received this question

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-05-14 Thread rhaven
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Answered => Open rhaven is still having a problem: Hi Bruno, thank you for the reply. Im looking to get the maximum inscribed sphere which fits in the pore. I confirmed that the output from

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-05-03 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Open => Answered Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: The problem here is to define which quantities you are interested in. If you can somehow define what you call a "pore body radius" then

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-05-02 Thread rhaven
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 rhaven gave more information on the question: Could this be an issue with the scale of the spheres? Or does the method have issues when dealing with clumps or overlapping spheres? -- You received this question

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-04-27 Thread rhaven
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Answered => Open rhaven is still having a problem: Hi Bruno, I compibled yade with the additional flag: -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-DTWOPHASEFLOW Then, using the code below I am able to export details about

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-04-24 Thread rhaven
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 rhaven posted a new comment: Thanks for the reply. Ill take a look at TwoPhaseFlowEngine and computePoreBodyRadius to see what I can glean from there best Jesse -- You received this question notification

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-04-24 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Open => Answered Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: Ok, then it is available. However it is not part of TesselationWrapper and still tricky to use. I would have to exploit

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-04-24 Thread rhaven
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Answered => Open rhaven is still having a problem: Please see attached picture http://pasteall.org/pic/890cbd9a2847d8f640088abf4eb42a2c I would like to calculate the radius of such an inscribed

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-04-24 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Open => Answered Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: It all depends on what you call a pore, a pore size, etc. B -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-04-24 Thread rhaven
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Answered => Open rhaven is still having a problem: Hi Bruno, thank you for the reply. Yes in general pores are not spherical. Sometimes they are assumed to be spherical for simplicity. I retract

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-04-24 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #668224 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Status: Open => Answered Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: Hi >If I understand correctly the following code generates a regular Delaunay triangulation, then computes the volume of each Voronoi

[Yade-users] [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

2018-04-24 Thread rhaven
New question #668224 on Yade: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224 Ive generated a few sets of packings and now I am looking to calculate the local porosity within each packing. I used the documentation for the TesselationWrapper [1] and the example [2] as a starting point. If