Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Status: Answered => Solved Zhang Wenyue confirmed that the question is solved: Thanks Robert Caulk, that solved my question. -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Status: Open => Answered Robert Caulk proposed the following answer: >> I wonder whether there is a method which can adjust dt automatically. Probably! If you determine such a method I encourage you to

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Status: Solved => Open Zhang Wenyue is still having a problem: Dear Robert, I try O.dt=0.1e-4. At first it performs well, but when I run long enough, the warning of negative volume still appears. I wonder

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Status: Answered => Solved Zhang Wenyue confirmed that the question is solved: Thanks Robert Caulk, that solved my question. -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Robert Caulk proposed the following answer: Hello, You have two problems that require two solutions. One of your problems is an interesting phenomenon that needs to be documented, so I went ahead and answered

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Status: Open => Answered Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: Hi, could you describe in which way you modified the example script to make it disfunctional? -- You received this question

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Zhang Wenyue posted a new comment: I have noticed a similar question: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/634175 I don't understand the answer in that question. Can anyone give me more help? I also

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Status: Answered => Open Zhang Wenyue is still having a problem: Sorry, the script should be like this. I find that the small particles did move slowly, which means the engine works. But the warning of

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

Question #670765 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Status: Open => Answered Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: Hi, could you describe in which way you modified the example script to make it disfunctional? -- You received this question

[Yade-users] [Question #670765]: negative volume for an ordinary pore

New question #670765 on Yade: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670765 Hi, I'm working on DEM-PFV coupling and get some problems. 1)When I run the simulation, I get such warning: negative volume for an ordinary pore (temp warning, should still be safe) 2)I start the simulation