Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2020-11-23 Thread Ferenc Safranyik
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Ferenc Safranyik posted a new comment: Dear Bruno and Luc, thank you for your help, it is really appreciated! The problem was solved based on Luc's comment. Moreover after some research I found out that

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2020-11-23 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment: Hi Ferenc, There's also this feature in the laws using interaction physics CohFrictPhys, and also in other more exotic functors (e.g. VirtualLubricationPhys). But Luc is

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2020-11-15 Thread Luc Scholtès
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Luc Scholtès posted a new comment: Hi, JCFPM is suitable for modeling rocks [1] and fractured rocks [2]. What do you want to model exacly? -> Please open a dedicated question since we are very far from " the

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2020-11-14 Thread Ferenc Safranyik
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Ferenc Safranyik posted a new comment: Dear Luc, thank you for your quick response. Sorry, it seemed to me, that in this way it is more easier to explain what I would like to do. Can you offer a detailed

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2020-11-14 Thread Luc Scholtès
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Luc Scholtès posted a new comment: Dear Feri, Yes there is solution for that. Just have a look at the script below which describes a uniaxial test with the JCFPM. More specifically, look at the intR parameter

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2020-11-14 Thread Ferenc Safranyik
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Ferenc Safranyik posted a new comment: Dear Bruno, is there a contact model exists in YADE which can handle non-overlapping spheres? I mean, is any solution to increase the compressional force while the spheres

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-22 Thread fengjingyu
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 fengjingyu posted a new comment: Thanks Bruno too. Feng -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. ___

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-22 Thread fengjingyu
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Status: Answered => Solved fengjingyu confirmed that the question is solved: Thanks Jan Stránský, that solved my question. -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-19 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: > Is it because the wall goes through the center of the ball? Yes. The displacement is proportional to force, increasing force more and more thus leads bodies to

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-17 Thread fengjingyu
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 fengjingyu posted a new comment: Hi, Jan Ask another question.When I run the code above. I increased maxLoad=1e6 to maxLoad=1e8. Why do some little balls go through walls? Is it because the wall goes through

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-17 Thread Jan Stránský
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Jan Stránský proposed the following answer: > I found that the wall would be compressed into the upper ball, and in addition, the ball would overlap with the ball yes. In reality (if the particles were soft),

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-17 Thread fengjingyu
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 fengjingyu posted a new comment: Hi Jan, Thank you for spending so much time with me. I don't know how to repay you.Thank you again. You said Yade (DEM in general) considers particles as perfectly rigid. But

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-17 Thread Jan Stránský
Question #676841 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676841 Status: Open => Answered Jan Stránský proposed the following answer: Hi Feng, > Yade should be a soft ball model ?? a reference please.. Yade (DEM in general) considers particles as perfectly rigid.. so