On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:28 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
> This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
>
> But I would like to say
> (1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
> should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
> found a
I just put it to CWIKI:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/EOL+%28End-of-life%29+Release+Branches
Any thoughts? If no I will go ahead to send it to user/dev/general email
lists. (Should we send it to general?)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
Hi folks,
Thanks all for sharing thoughts.
I suggest moving branch-2 last release related discussion to a separate
thread.
We got 10 binding +1s. And no -1 to the proposal. I'm going to put this to
WIKI first. And feel free to create a ticket and update our website.
Thanks,
Wangda
On Wed, Aug
+1 for the proposal.
I thought we already EOL-ed 2.6 though some time ago.
Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This
This is starting to diverge from the original topic :)
But I would like to say
(1) If we are treating branch-2/2.0 as the final, last 2.x release, we
should be proactive in updating dependencies. I did a quick search and
found a lot of dependencies in branch-2 are very old, and some are even
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:20 AM Eric Badger wrote:
>
> - Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
> actively
> using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
>
> - Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
>
> We have talked at
- Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
- Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
syncs
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
>
> [2.0.x - 2.7.x]
> [3.0.x]
>
> 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
>
one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10
Hi Steve,
The proposal is to EOL for the following branches:
[2.0.x - 2.7.x]
[3.0.x]
2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL.
Thoughts?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+?
+1
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 8/21/19 12:02, Wangda Tan wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
Please feel free to share your
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:52 AM Kihwal Lee
wrote:
> +1
>
> Kihwal
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This
+1
Haibo
From: Erik Krogen
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 08:28
To: Jonathan Eagles ; Sunil Govindan
Cc: Wangda Tan ; yarn-dev ;
Hdfs-dev ; mapreduce-dev
; Hadoop Common
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1 thanks for initiating
+1
Kihwal
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to
+1 thanks for initiating an official vote Wangda!
From: Jonathan Eagles
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Sunil Govindan
Cc: Wangda Tan ; yarn-dev ;
Hdfs-dev ; mapreduce-dev
; Hadoop Common
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This
+1
- Sunil
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Sean Busbey
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs
+1
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share
+1
-Akira
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung wrote:
>
> +1. Thanks!
>
> Jonathan Hung
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions
+1. Thanks!
Jonathan Hung
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please
Hi all,
This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
Please feel free to share your thoughts.
Thanks,
Wangda
[1]
22 matches
Mail list logo
