Let me conclude the vote with my +1.
With 4 +1s and no -1s, the vote passes. Thanks Daniel, Arun and Sangjin for
voting. Given the +1 from Jenkins as well, I ll go ahead and merge the
branch as a single commit.
Thanks
Karthik
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu
+1
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Arun Suresh wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Daniel Templeton
> wrote:
>
> > +1 on the merge. Nice work, Karthik!
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On 11/16/16 9:17 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> Based on the positive fee
+1
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Daniel Templeton
wrote:
> +1 on the merge. Nice work, Karthik!
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 11/16/16 9:17 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Based on the positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread [1], I would like to
>> start a formal vote to merge featur
+1 on the merge. Nice work, Karthik!
Daniel
On 11/16/16 9:17 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
Hi folks,
Based on the positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread [1], I would like to
start a formal vote to merge feature branch YARN-4752 to trunk. The
cumulative patch is posted to YARN-4752, and squashe
Hi folks,
Based on the positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread [1], I would like to
start a formal vote to merge feature branch YARN-4752 to trunk. The
cumulative patch is posted to YARN-4752, and squashed into one commit here
[2].
The changes include:
1. Preemption considers individual Resou