Re: [VOTE] create ozone-dev and ozone-issues mailing lists

2019-10-27 Thread Ayush Saxena
+1 -Ayush > On 27-Oct-2019, at 1:55 PM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > > As discussed earlier in the thread of "Hadoop-Ozone repository mailing list > configurations" [1] I suggested to solve the current misconfiguration problem > with creating separated mailing lists (dev/issues) for Hadoop

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.10.0 (RC0)

2019-10-27 Thread epa...@apache.org
Ah! Yes! That makes sense. I will use the mapredonhdfs framework in my next set of tests. The other compatibility tests that I ran worked as expected. -Eric On Saturday, October 26, 2019, 12:29:54 PM CDT, Jonathan Hung wrote: Hi Eric, I took a quick look, are you using

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86

2019-10-27 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/1302/ No changes -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: asflicense findbugs hadolint pathlen unit xml The following subsystems voted -1 but were configured to be filtered/ignored: cc

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2+JDK7 on Linux/x86

2019-10-27 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/487/ No changes -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: asflicense findbugs hadolint pathlen unit xml The following subsystems voted -1 but were configured to be filtered/ignored: cc

[VOTE] create ozone-dev and ozone-issues mailing lists

2019-10-27 Thread Elek, Marton
As discussed earlier in the thread of "Hadoop-Ozone repository mailing list configurations" [1] I suggested to solve the current misconfiguration problem with creating separated mailing lists (dev/issues) for Hadoop Ozone. It would have some additional benefit: for example it would make