[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-2962) ZKRMStateStore: Limit the number of znodes under a znode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17003353#comment-17003353 ] chaoli edited comment on YARN-2962 at 12/25/19 6:08 PM: I'm not quite agree with

[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-2962) ZKRMStateStore: Limit the number of znodes under a znode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17003353#comment-17003353 ] chaoli edited comment on YARN-2962 at 12/25/19 6:07 PM: I'm not quite agree with

[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-2962) ZKRMStateStore: Limit the number of znodes under a znode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17003353#comment-17003353 ] chaoli edited comment on YARN-2962 at 12/25/19 6:06 PM: I'm not quite agree with

[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-2962) ZKRMStateStore: Limit the number of znodes under a znode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17003353#comment-17003353 ] chaoli edited comment on YARN-2962 at 12/25/19 6:05 PM: I'm not quite agreed with

[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-2962) ZKRMStateStore: Limit the number of znodes under a znode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17003353#comment-17003353 ] chaoli edited comment on YARN-2962 at 12/25/19 6:05 PM: I'm not quite agreed with

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2962) ZKRMStateStore: Limit the number of znodes under a znode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17003353#comment-17003353 ] chaoli commented on YARN-2962: -- I'm not quite agreed with this patch. I recently read zookeeper source code,

[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10045) hostResolver should take DNS server‘s availability into account

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chaoli updated YARN-10045: -- Description: As we all  know, hostResolver in hadoop is implemented by *SecurityUitl.getByName*. there are

[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10045) hostResolver should take DNS server‘s availability into account

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chaoli updated YARN-10045: -- Description: As we all  know, hostResolver in hadoop is implemented by SecurityUitl.getByName. there are two

[jira] [Created] (YARN-10045) Host Resolve should take DNS server

chaoli created YARN-10045: - Summary: Host Resolve should take DNS server Key: YARN-10045 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10045 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-9823) NodeManager cannot get right ResourceTrack address in Federation mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16925714#comment-16925714 ] chaoli edited comment on YARN-9823 at 9/9/19 2:01 PM: -- This is bug.  because RM has

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9823) NodeManager cannot get right ResourceTrack address in Federation mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16925714#comment-16925714 ] chaoli commented on YARN-9823: -- This is bug.  because RM has not deliver resource tracker address in