[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2015-04-29 Thread Xianyin Xin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14518781#comment-14518781 ] Xianyin Xin commented on YARN-2176: --- Sorry [~jlowe], i've made a mistake. What i thought

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2015-04-28 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14517043#comment-14517043 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2176: -- It is less efficient to lump them all together. As

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2015-04-28 Thread Xianyin Xin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14516808#comment-14516808 ] Xianyin Xin commented on YARN-2176: --- Hi [~jlowe] and [~leftnoteasy], in YARN-3361, all

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2015-04-27 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14514506#comment-14514506 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-2176: -- [~jlowe], this problem should be resolved in CS after

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2015-04-27 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14514610#comment-14514610 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-2176: -- Make sense, just commented on the YARN-3547, it should

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2015-04-27 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14514581#comment-14514581 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2176: -- Yes, it appears most of the benefit should be there.

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-20 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14039143#comment-14039143 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2176: -- Ah, yes. AppSchedulingInfo should only be created by

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-19 Thread Sandy Ryza (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14038045#comment-14038045 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-2176: -- Can we merge the ActiveUsersManager stuff into an

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-18 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14035799#comment-14035799 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2176: -- AppSchedulingInfo is already determining when an app

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-18 Thread Sandy Ryza (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14035902#comment-14035902 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-2176: -- The Fair Scheduler should probably avoid this as well.

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-18 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14035905#comment-14035905 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2176: -- That proposal would work for the deactivate path, but

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-18 Thread Sandy Ryza (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14035925#comment-14035925 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-2176: -- Ah, good point, you're right. In that case what do

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-18 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14036093#comment-14036093 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2176: -- Sure, that works if we think that's cleaner. It's a

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-18 Thread Sandy Ryza (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14036130#comment-14036130 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-2176: -- Without the ActivationCallback, the ActiveUsersManager

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2176) CapacityScheduler loops over all running applications rather than actively requesting apps

2014-06-18 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14036451#comment-14036451 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2176: -- ActiveUsersManager doesn't have a reference to the