[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15243627#comment-15243627 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4940: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9620 (See

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15243500#comment-15243500 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4940: -- +1 lgtm. The test failures appear to be unrelated. Committing this.

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15243194#comment-15243194 ] Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-4940: --- +1 lgtm (non-binding). > yarn node -list -all failed if RM start

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242910#comment-15242910 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4940: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242785#comment-15242785 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4940: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242768#comment-15242768 ] sandflee commented on YARN-4940: Thanks [~templedf] [~kshukla], update the patch, and I don't think the

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242756#comment-15242756 ] Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-4940: --- Latest patch looking good with the minute nit of extra line before

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15241738#comment-15241738 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4940: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237533#comment-15237533 ] Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-4940: I agree with [~kshukla] on both counts. The fix seems

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237387#comment-15237387 ] sandflee commented on YARN-4940: thanks [~kshukla], the test failures seems not related, I'll check it

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237335#comment-15237335 ] Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-4940: --- The fix in the patch looks good. I have not looked at all the test

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237266#comment-15237266 ] Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-4940: --- Thank you for reporting this [~sandflee]. Did the fix for YARN-4723

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237227#comment-15237227 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4940: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237071#comment-15237071 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4940: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237007#comment-15237007 ] sandflee commented on YARN-4940: rather than converting UnknownNodeId , using NodeId seems more simple and

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15235388#comment-15235388 ] sandflee commented on YARN-4940: seems not, they are all caused by YARN-3102 > yarn node -list -all failed

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4940) yarn node -list -all failed if RM start with decommissioned node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15234892#comment-15234892 ] Bibin A Chundatt commented on YARN-4940: Same as YARN-4723?? > yarn node -list -all failed if RM