[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14646374#comment-14646374 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-2768: +1 optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14630688#comment-14630688 ] Hong Zhiguo commented on YARN-2768: --- [~kasha], could you please review the patch? optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14586733#comment-14586733 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-2768: Thanks for the clarification, [~zhiguohong]. Let me take a closer look at the patch and provide review comments. optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14581349#comment-14581349 ] Hong Zhiguo commented on YARN-2768: --- [~kasha], the excution time displayed in the profiling output is cumulative. Actually, I repeated such profiling a lot of times and got the same ratio. The profiling is done with a cluster of NM/AM simulators and I don't have such resource now. I wrote a testcase which creates 8000 nodes, 4500 apps within 1200 queues, and then performs 1 rounds of FairScheduler.update(), and print the average execution time of one call to update. With this patch, the average execution time decreased from about 35ms to 20ms. I think the effect comes from GC and memory allocation since in each round of FairScheduler.update(), Resource.multiply is called as many times as the number of pending ResourceRequests, which is more than 3 million in our production cluster. optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525953#comment-14525953 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2768: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | pre-patch | 14m 35s | Pre-patch trunk compilation is healthy. | | {color:green}+1{color} | @author | 0m 0s | The patch does not contain any @author tags. | | {color:red}-1{color} | tests included | 0m 0s | The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. | | {color:green}+1{color} | javac | 7m 35s | There were no new javac warning messages. | | {color:green}+1{color} | javadoc | 9m 33s | There were no new javadoc warning messages. | | {color:green}+1{color} | release audit | 0m 22s | The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. | | {color:red}-1{color} | checkstyle | 1m 17s | The applied patch generated 1 new checkstyle issues (total was 6, now 7). | | {color:green}+1{color} | whitespace | 0m 0s | The patch has no lines that end in whitespace. | | {color:green}+1{color} | install | 1m 35s | mvn install still works. | | {color:green}+1{color} | eclipse:eclipse | 0m 33s | The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. | | {color:green}+1{color} | findbugs | 2m 36s | The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. | | {color:green}+1{color} | yarn tests | 1m 56s | Tests passed in hadoop-yarn-common. | | {color:green}+1{color} | yarn tests | 52m 21s | Tests passed in hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager. | | | | 92m 39s | | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | Patch URL | http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12677855/YARN-2768.patch | | Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle | | git revision | trunk / a319771 | | checkstyle | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7673/artifact/patchprocess/diffcheckstylehadoop-yarn-common.txt | | hadoop-yarn-common test log | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7673/artifact/patchprocess/testrun_hadoop-yarn-common.txt | | hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager test log | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7673/artifact/patchprocess/testrun_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt | | Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7673/testReport/ | | Java | 1.7.0_55 | | uname | Linux asf902.gq1.ygridcore.net 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7673/console | This message was automatically generated. optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525672#comment-14525672 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2768: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | pre-patch | 14m 38s | Pre-patch trunk compilation is healthy. | | {color:green}+1{color} | @author | 0m 0s | The patch does not contain any @author tags. | | {color:red}-1{color} | tests included | 0m 0s | The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. | | {color:green}+1{color} | javac | 7m 34s | There were no new javac warning messages. | | {color:green}+1{color} | javadoc | 9m 37s | There were no new javadoc warning messages. | | {color:green}+1{color} | release audit | 0m 22s | The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. | | {color:red}-1{color} | checkstyle | 1m 14s | The applied patch generated 1 new checkstyle issues (total was 6, now 7). | | {color:green}+1{color} | whitespace | 0m 0s | The patch has no lines that end in whitespace. | | {color:green}+1{color} | install | 1m 37s | mvn install still works. | | {color:green}+1{color} | eclipse:eclipse | 0m 33s | The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. | | {color:green}+1{color} | findbugs | 2m 38s | The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. | | {color:green}+1{color} | yarn tests | 1m 57s | Tests passed in hadoop-yarn-common. | | {color:green}+1{color} | yarn tests | 52m 8s | Tests passed in hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager. | | | | 92m 33s | | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | Patch URL | http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12677855/YARN-2768.patch | | Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle | | git revision | trunk / e8d0ee5 | | checkstyle | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7668/artifact/patchprocess/diffcheckstylehadoop-yarn-common.txt | | hadoop-yarn-common test log | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7668/artifact/patchprocess/testrun_hadoop-yarn-common.txt | | hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager test log | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7668/artifact/patchprocess/testrun_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt | | Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7668/testReport/ | | Java | 1.7.0_55 | | uname | Linux asf903.gq1.ygridcore.net 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7668/console | This message was automatically generated. optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14201950#comment-14201950 ] Hudson commented on YARN-2768: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #736 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Yarn-trunk/736/]) YARN-2768 Improved Yarn Registry service record structure (stevel) (stevel: rev 1670578018b3210d518408530858a869e37b23cb) * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/src/site/markdown/registry/yarn-registry.md * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/RegistryUtils.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/JsonSerDeser.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ServiceRecordHeader.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/tla/yarnregistry.tla * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/Endpoint.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/exceptions/NoRecordException.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/impl/zk/RegistryOperationsService.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/RegistryTypeUtils.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/operations/TestRegistryOperations.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/AddressTypes.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ServiceRecord.java * hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/TestMarshalling.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/cli/RegistryCli.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/RegistryTestHelper.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ProtocolTypes.java optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14202073#comment-14202073 ] Hudson commented on YARN-2768: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #1926 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/1926/]) YARN-2768 Improved Yarn Registry service record structure (stevel) (stevel: rev 1670578018b3210d518408530858a869e37b23cb) * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/exceptions/NoRecordException.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/RegistryTypeUtils.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/Endpoint.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/RegistryUtils.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ProtocolTypes.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ServiceRecord.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/tla/yarnregistry.tla * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/TestMarshalling.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/RegistryTestHelper.java * hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/JsonSerDeser.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/AddressTypes.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/operations/TestRegistryOperations.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ServiceRecordHeader.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/impl/zk/RegistryOperationsService.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/cli/RegistryCli.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/src/site/markdown/registry/yarn-registry.md optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14202147#comment-14202147 ] Hudson commented on YARN-2768: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #1950 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/1950/]) YARN-2768 Improved Yarn Registry service record structure (stevel) (stevel: rev 1670578018b3210d518408530858a869e37b23cb) * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/RegistryUtils.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/impl/zk/RegistryOperationsService.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/RegistryTestHelper.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ProtocolTypes.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/JsonSerDeser.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/src/site/markdown/registry/yarn-registry.md * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/tla/yarnregistry.tla * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/operations/TestRegistryOperations.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/cli/RegistryCli.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ServiceRecordHeader.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/TestMarshalling.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/exceptions/NoRecordException.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/AddressTypes.java * hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/RegistryTypeUtils.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/Endpoint.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ServiceRecord.java optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14200861#comment-14200861 ] Hudson commented on YARN-2768: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #6469 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/6469/]) YARN-2768 Improved Yarn Registry service record structure (stevel) (stevel: rev 1670578018b3210d518408530858a869e37b23cb) * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/impl/zk/RegistryOperationsService.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/RegistryTestHelper.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/cli/RegistryCli.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/AddressTypes.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/src/site/markdown/registry/yarn-registry.md * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/RegistryTypeUtils.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ProtocolTypes.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/operations/TestRegistryOperations.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ServiceRecordHeader.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/exceptions/NoRecordException.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/tla/yarnregistry.tla * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/ServiceRecord.java * hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/JsonSerDeser.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/RegistryUtils.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/types/Endpoint.java * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-registry/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/registry/client/binding/TestMarshalling.java optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14188146#comment-14188146 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2768: - {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12677853/profiling_FairScheduler_update.png against trunk revision ec63a3f. {color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/5624//console This message is automatically generated. optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2768) optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14188222#comment-14188222 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2768: - {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12677855/YARN-2768.patch against trunk revision ec63a3f. {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages. {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager: org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.webapp.TestRMWebServicesApps {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/5625//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/5625//console This message is automatically generated. optimize FSAppAttempt.updateDemand by avoid clone of Resource which takes 85% of computing time of update thread Key: YARN-2768 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2768 Project: Hadoop YARN Issue Type: Improvement Components: fairscheduler Reporter: Hong Zhiguo Assignee: Hong Zhiguo Priority: Minor Attachments: YARN-2768.patch, profiling_FairScheduler_update.png See the attached picture of profiling result. The clone of Resource object within Resources.multiply() takes up **85%** (19.2 / 22.6) CPU time of the function FairScheduler.update(). The code of FSAppAttempt.updateDemand: {code} public void updateDemand() { demand = Resources.createResource(0); // Demand is current consumption plus outstanding requests Resources.addTo(demand, app.getCurrentConsumption()); // Add up outstanding resource requests synchronized (app) { for (Priority p : app.getPriorities()) { for (ResourceRequest r : app.getResourceRequests(p).values()) { Resource total = Resources.multiply(r.getCapability(), r.getNumContainers()); Resources.addTo(demand, total); } } } } {code} The code of Resources.multiply: {code} public static Resource multiply(Resource lhs, double by) { return multiplyTo(clone(lhs), by); } {code} The clone could be skipped by directly update the value of this.demand. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)