[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15026736#comment-15026736 ] Junping Du commented on YARN-4384: -- Thanks [~leftnoteasy] for review and commit! > updateNodeResource CLI

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15025820#comment-15025820 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4384: -- +1, committing... > updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15025840#comment-15025840 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4384: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #8882 (See

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15025913#comment-15025913 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4384: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8 #719 (See

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15025919#comment-15025919 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4384: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #1451 (See

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15026068#comment-15026068 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4384: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk-Java8 #729 (See

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15026086#comment-15026086 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4384: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #2661 (See

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15026139#comment-15026139 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4384: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #2577 (See

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15026193#comment-15026193 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4384: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 #640 (See

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15024356#comment-15024356 ] Junping Du commented on YARN-4384: -- Test failures are not related and tracked by YARN-4351. >

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15022840#comment-15022840 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4384: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4384) updateNodeResource CLI should not accept negative values for resource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15022459#comment-15022459 ] Junping Du commented on YARN-4384: -- Thanks for reporting this, [~ssreenivasan]! I agree that we should