[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17500049#comment-17500049
]
guosong commented on YARN-9552:
---
hello, how to repeat this bug? Is there any trigger condition for this bug？
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.2, 3.1.4
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.1.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.1.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.2.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.003.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16947862#comment-16947862
]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9552:
It's been on trunk since May, so it should be okay there.
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.2, 3.1.4
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.1.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.1.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.2.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.003.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-0
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16947857#comment-16947857
]
Steve Loughran commented on YARN-9552:
--
trunk and branch-3.2 doesn't build; this looks suspiciously like the patch at
fault. Reopening -can someone look @ this
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.2, 3.1.4
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.1.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.1.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.2.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.003.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAtte
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16947608#comment-16947608
]
Szilard Nemeth commented on YARN-9552:
--
Hi [~pbacsko]!
Committed your patches to branch-3.2 and branch-3.1 as well!
Thanks!
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.1.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.1.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.2.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.003.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulin
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16938279#comment-16938279
]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9552:
[~snemeth] you can now backport this patch to branch-3.1 and branch-3.2
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.1.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.1.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.2.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.003.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-0
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16935862#comment-16935862
]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9552:
[~giovanni.fumarola] [~sunilg] could you guys review & commit the new patches
to branch-3.2 and branch-3.1?
Test failures are unrelated.
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.1.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.1.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.001.patch,
> YARN-9552-branch-3.2.002.patch, YARN-9552-branch-3.2.003.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAtte
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16934975#comment-16934975
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9552:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
35s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 21m
32s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 27s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
12s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 7s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 70m 3s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}124m 56s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.metrics.TestSystemMetricsPublisherForV2 |
| |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.metrics.TestCombinedSystemMetricsPublisher |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:63396beab41 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9552 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12980957/YARN-9552-branch-3.2.003.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 048e87d948d0 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6
11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | branch-3.2 / e31594f |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_222 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24817/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24817/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 802 (vs. ulimit of
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16934624#comment-16934624
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9552:
-
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 16m
38s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.1 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 24m
43s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
46s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 48s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
25s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 11s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 69m
42s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}148m 12s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:080e9d0f9b3 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9552 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12980910/YARN-9552-branch-3.1.002.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux f57f76c44878 4.15.0-60-generic #67-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 22
16:55:30 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | branch-3.1 / 6ef3204 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_222 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24815/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 799 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
U:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
|
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24815/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically g
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16934415#comment-16934415
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9552:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 17m
2s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.1 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 17m
28s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 2s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 26s{color} | {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 1 new + 21 unchanged - 0 fixed = 22 total (was 21) {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 57s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 66m 33s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}133m 20s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.TestFSAppAttempt |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:080e9d0f9b3 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9552 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12980879/YARN-9552-branch-3.1.001.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux a52ebeeb2b8f 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6
11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | branch-3.1 / 6ef3204 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_222 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24814/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24814/artifac
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16934317#comment-16934317
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9552:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
31s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 21m
32s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 52s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 27s{color} | {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 1 new + 20 unchanged - 0 fixed = 21 total (was 20) {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 0s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 70m 58s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}128m 10s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.applicationsmanager.TestAMRestart |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.TestFSAppAttempt |
| |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.metrics.TestSystemMetricsPublisherForV2 |
| |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.metrics.TestCombinedSystemMetricsPublisher |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:63396beab41 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9552 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12980861/YARN-9552-branch-3.2.001.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 08e1d14191d7 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6
11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | branch-3.2 / b207244 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_222 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16934105#comment-16934105
]
Steven Rand commented on YARN-9552:
---
Thanks!
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,752 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplicationAttempt(546)) - Added
> Application Attempt appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01 to scheduler from
> user:
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16934080#comment-16934080
]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9552:
[~Steven Rand] it shouldn't be a big deal to create patches that applies to
those branches. I'll see if there's any conflict and upload patches for
branch-3.2 and 3.1.
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,752 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16934050#comment-16934050
]
Steven Rand commented on YARN-9552:
---
This seems like an important fix since it prevents the RM from crashing – any
chance we can backport it to the 3.2 and 3.1 maintenance releases?
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,752 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (Fair
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840679#comment-16840679
]
Hudson commented on YARN-9552:
--
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #16554 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/16554/])
YARN-9552. FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException.
(gifuma: rev 55bd35921c2bb013e45120bbd1602b658b8b999b)
* (edit)
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/fair/TestFSAppAttempt.java
* (edit)
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/fair/FSAppAttempt.java
* (edit)
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/AppSchedulingInfo.java
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840663#comment-16840663
]
Giovanni Matteo Fumarola commented on YARN-9552:
Committed [^YARN-9552-004.patch] to trunk. The patch looks good.
Thanks [~pbacsko] for working on this and [~snemeth] for the initial review.
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,752 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> f
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840475#comment-16840475
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9552:
-
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 16m
59s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 58s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 55s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
18s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 80m
34s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}127m 40s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9552 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12968787/YARN-9552-004.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 693c2ec01b77 4.4.0-139-generic #165-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 24
10:58:50 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 570fa2d |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24094/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 862 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
U:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
|
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24094/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can ca
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840350#comment-16840350
]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9552:
Thanks Szilard. Ok, I uploaded patch v4 just to make checkstyle happy :)
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch, YARN-9552-004.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,752 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplicationAttempt(546)) - Added
> Application Attempt appattempt_1557237478804_000
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840349#comment-16840349
]
Szilard Nemeth commented on YARN-9552:
--
Hi [~pbacsko]!
+1 (non-binding) for the latest patch!
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,752 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplicationAttempt(546)) - Added
> Application Attempt appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01 to scheduler from
> user:
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840346#comment-16840346
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9552:
-
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m
2s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 11s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
16s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 30s{color} | {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 1 new + 20 unchanged - 0 fixed = 21 total (was 20) {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 50s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 85m
3s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}139m 11s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9552 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12968773/YARN-9552-003.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 3f35447184cd 4.4.0-144-generic #170~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar
18 15:02:05 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 570fa2d |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_212 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24092/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24092/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 915 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-ya
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840256#comment-16840256
]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9552:
[~snemeth] I added a short comment to the testcase.
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch,
> YARN-9552-003.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,752 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplicationAttempt(546)) - Added
> Application Attempt appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01 to scheduler from
> user: bacsko
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839464#comment-16839464
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9552:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
15s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 17m
3s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 13s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
16s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 39s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 82m 1s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}130m 34s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.TestCapacityScheduler |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9552 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12968676/YARN-9552-002.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux dadf97efb955 4.4.0-139-generic #165-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 24
10:58:50 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 6bcc1dc |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24089/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24089/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 927 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
U:
hadoop-yarn-proje
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839432#comment-16839432
]
Szilard Nemeth commented on YARN-9552:
--
Hi [~pbacsko]!
Please add a javadoc to the newly added test method as for the first look, it's
not that trivial what the testcase is actually testing.
> FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
>Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9552-001.patch, YARN-9552-002.patch
>
>
> We observed a race condition inside YARN with the following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> 18/11/07 06:45:09.559 SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor ERROR
> EventDispatcher: Error in handling event type NODE_UPDATE to the Event
> Dispatcher
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap.firstKey(ConcurrentSkipListMap.java:2036)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet.first(ConcurrentSkipListSet.java:396)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.AppSchedulingInfo.getNextPendingAsk(AppSchedulingInfo.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.isOverAMShareLimit(FSAppAttempt.java:941)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt.assignContainer(FSAppAttempt.java:1373)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSLeafQueue.assignContainer(FSLeafQueue.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSParentQueue.assignContainer(FSParentQueue.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.attemptScheduling(FairScheduler.java:1094)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.nodeUpdate(FairScheduler.java:961)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:1183)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.handle(FairScheduler.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run(EventDispatcher.java:66)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> This is basically the same as the one described in YARN-7382, but the root
> cause is different.
> When we create an application attempt, we create an {{FSAppAttempt}} object.
> This contains an {{AppSchedulingInfo}} which contains a set of
> {{SchedulerRequestKey}}. Initially, this set is empty and only initialized a
> bit later on a separate thread during a state transition:
> {noformat}
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,659 INFO [RM StateStore dispatcher]
> recovery.RMStateStore (RMStateStore.java:transition(239)) - Storing info for
> app: application_1557237478804_0001
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,684 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from NEW_SAVING to SUBMITTED on event = APP_NEW_SAVED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,690 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplication(490)) - Accepted
> application application_1557237478804_0001 from user: bacskop, in queue:
> root.bacskop, currently num of applications: 1
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,698 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] rmapp.RMAppImpl
> (RMAppImpl.java:handle(903)) - application_1557237478804_0001 State change
> from SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED on event = APP_ACCEPTED
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,731 INFO [RM Event dispatcher]
> resourcemanager.ApplicationMasterService
> (ApplicationMasterService.java:registerAppAttempt(434)) - Registering app
> attempt : appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,732 INFO [RM Event dispatcher] attempt.RMAppAttemptImpl
> (RMAppAttemptImpl.java:handle(920)) - appattempt_1557237478804_0001_01
> State change from NEW to SUBMITTED on event = START
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,746 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(207)) - *** In the constructor of
> SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,747 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt
> (SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java:(230)) - *** Contents of
> appSchedulingInfo: []
> 2019-05-07 15:58:02,752 INFO [SchedulerEventDispatcher:Event Processor]
> fair.FairScheduler (FairScheduler.java:addApplicationAttempt(546)) - Added
> Applicatio
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9552) FairScheduler: NODE_UPDATE can cause NoSuchElementException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839356#comment-16839356
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9552:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
12s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 16m
43s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
43s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 10s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 3s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 82m
57s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}132m 46s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9552 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12968664/YARN-9552-001.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux a10208900547 4.4.0-139-generic #165-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 24
10:58:50 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 6bcc1dc |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24088/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 884 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
U:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
|
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24088/console |
| Powered by | Apa
