[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15192683#comment-15192683
]
Peng Zhang commented on YARN-3054:
--
Thanks [~kasha]
I agreed with "have a preemption prior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15191556#comment-15191556
]
Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-3054:
Also, the approach being proposed on YARN-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15191554#comment-15191554
]
Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-3054:
Also, the approach being proposed on YARN-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15191538#comment-15191538
]
Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-3054:
Thanks [~peng.zhang]. I understand it now.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186492#comment-15186492
]
Peng Zhang commented on YARN-3054:
--
Preemption happened on low priority container, and for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186463#comment-15186463
]
Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-3054:
[~peng.zhang] - the problem reported is no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14277174#comment-14277174
]
Wei Yan commented on YARN-3054:
---
Hi, [~peng.zhang]. Firstly, FairScheduler will check whether