[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14742795#comment-14742795
 ] 

Xianyin Xin commented on YARN-4134:
-----------------------------------

Just found this issue duplicated YARN-3405, but the two has different 
solutions. Since this issue would be addressed in YARN-2154, link them together.

> FairScheduler preemption stops at queue level that all child queues are not 
> over their fairshare
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4134
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4134
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fairscheduler
>            Reporter: Xianyin Xin
>            Assignee: Xianyin Xin
>         Attachments: YARN-4134.001.patch, YARN-4134.002.patch, 
> YARN-4134.003.patch
>
>
> Now FairScheudler uses a choose-a-candidate method to select a container from 
> leaf queues that to be preempted, in {{FSParentQueue.preemptContainer()}},
> {code}
>     readLock.lock();
>     try {
>       for (FSQueue queue : childQueues) {
>         if (candidateQueue == null ||
>             comparator.compare(queue, candidateQueue) > 0) {
>           candidateQueue = queue;
>         }
>       }
>     } finally {
>       readLock.unlock();
>     }
>     // Let the selected queue choose which of its container to preempt
>     if (candidateQueue != null) {
>       toBePreempted = candidateQueue.preemptContainer();
>     }
> {code}
> a candidate child queue is selected. However, if the queue's usage isn't over 
> it's fairshare, preemption will not happen:
> {code}
>     if (!preemptContainerPreCheck()) {
>       return toBePreempted;
>     }
> {code}
>  A scenario:
> {code}
>             root
>            /    \
>       queue1   queue2
>                /    \
>           queue2.3, (  queue2.4  )
> {code}
> suppose there're 8 containers, and queues at any level have the same weight. 
> queue1 takes 4 and queue2.3 takes 4, so both queue1 and queue2 are at their 
> fairshare. Now we submit an app in queue2.4 with 4 containers needs, it 
> should preempt 2 from queue2.3, but the candidate-containers selection 
> procedure will stop at queue1, so none of the containers will be preempted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to