Steven Rand created YARN-6956:
---------------------------------

             Summary: preemption may only consider resource requests for one 
node
                 Key: YARN-6956
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6956
             Project: Hadoop YARN
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: fairscheduler
    Affects Versions: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1
         Environment: CDH 5.11.0
            Reporter: Steven Rand


I'm observing the following series of events on a CDH 5.11.0 cluster, which 
seem to be possible after https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6163:

1. An application is considered to be starved, so {{FSPreemptionThread}} calls 
{{identifyContainersToPreempt}}, and that calls 
{{FSAppAttempt#getStarvedResourceRequests}} to get a list of 
{{ResourceRequest}} instances that are enough to address the app's starvation.

2. The first {{ResourceRequest}} that {{getStarvedResourceRequests}} sees is 
enough to address the app's starvation, so we break out of the loop over 
{{appSchedulingInfo.getAllResourceRequests()}} after only one iteration: 
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/fair/FSAppAttempt.java#L1180.
 We return only this one {{ResourceRequest}} back to the 
{{identifyContainersToPreempt}} method.

3. It turns out that this particular {{ResourceRequest}} happens to have a 
value for {{getResourceName}} that identifies a specific node in the cluster. 
This cause preemption to only consider containers on that node, and not the 
rest of the cluster.

[~kasha], does that make sense? I'm happy to submit a patch if I'm 
understanding the problem correctly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to