[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Akira AJISAKA updated YARN-4544:
--------------------------------
    Summary: All the log messages about rolling monitoring interval are shown 
with WARN level  (was: All the log messages about rolling monitoring interval 
are shown with the WARN level)

> All the log messages about rolling monitoring interval are shown with WARN 
> level
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4544
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4544
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: log-aggregation, nodemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Takashi Ohnishi
>            Assignee: Takashi Ohnishi
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: YARN-4544.2.patch, YARN-4544.patch
>
>
> About yarn.nodemanager.log-aggregation.roll-monitoring-interval-seconds, 
> there are three log messages corresponding to the value set to this 
> parameter, but all of them are shown with the WARN level.
> (a) disabled (default)
> {code}
> 2016-01-05 22:19:29,062 WARN 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.logaggreg     
> ation.AppLogAggregatorImpl: rollingMonitorInterval is set as -1. The log 
> rolling mornitoring interval is disabled. The logs will be aggregated after 
> this application is finished.
> {code}
> (b) enabled
> {code}
> 2016-01-06 00:41:15,808 WARN 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.logaggregation.AppLogAggregatorImpl:
>  rollingMonitorInterval is set as 7200. The logs will be aggregated every 
> 7200 seconds
> {code}
> (c) enabled but wrong configuration
> {code}
> 2016-01-06 00:39:50,820 WARN 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.logaggregation.AppLogAggregatorImpl:
>  rollingMonitorIntervall should be more than or equal to 3600 seconds. Using 
> 3600 seconds instead.
> {code}
> I think it is better to output with WARN only in case (c), but it is ok to 
> output with INFO in case (a) and (b).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to