Tim Larson wrote:
I don't agree. If there are aspects of the page that
I'm going to use as tags anyway, why not give the option
to have it done automatically?
Autotag it!
Joshua Schachter wrote:
This is wrong-headed. The domain is metadata. Tags are metadata +
attention; people tag so
ivan santiesteban wrote:
This has been interesting. I like Timothy's push for more automatic
tags. We already have system:filetype:, so it's not something entirely
new.
As microformats grow these things could work really well for specific
uses.
I think the only things you have to
Vinay Augustine wrote:
I'm not sure how useful metadata is. I mean, metadata that's important
to you (like the webpage URL) isn't important to me at all.
How does Joshua decide which pieces of metadata to include?
Certain metadata are nearly universal of any resource you'd look up.
Just for
James Miskiewicz wrote:
I think Tim may have inadvertently stepped into a previous discussion;
I skimmed a couple months of archives before I jumped in but didn't
notice anything. My apologies if I'm trodding all over a core Delicious
philosophy here.
it's been said in the past that Joshua
On 2/3/06, Larson, Timothy E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not take advantage of some of the things the producer has already
included in the content when you bookmark it? There must be _some_
overlap between what the producer and consumer think is noteworthy about
the content, right? That
Any reports of general problems between bloglines and delicious? All
of my delicious feeds in bloglines are showing up as non-existent and
have been for days, and my staff and faculty are reporting the same
problem. I'm checking with bloglines folks too, but figured I'd check
here.
c
--
Chris
Larson, Timothy E. wrote:
I mentioned the meta name=author tag. Not widely used, but it's
there, at least for HTML. If a service like Delicious started to make
use of it, it could drive more people to use it correctly. All the
people who have been thoughtfully including such metadata for
7 matches
Mail list logo
