hi i'am new here and i have some questions :First is this plan to have a search function for the mailing list archive ?Finding if my questions has been already posted was not easy.Second :How can i identify my user with the api ?
Is there some parameter to add in the url ?Third :How can i register
About six weeks ago I said in this mailing list that I was working on a
program to view/browse/search email list archives.
At the time I expected to release this program very soon, but it took
considerably longer than I expected. I have to suppress the urge to add
improvements... Maybe one
http://del.icio.us/mark5v2
Che Dong
http://www.chedong.com/
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
bussiere bussiere wrote:
hi i'am new here and i have some questions :
First is this plan to have a search function for the mailing list
archive ?
Finding if my questions has been already posted was not easy.
you can search the archives with google:
Yesterday, I asked about tagging for others using for:. It got me
thinking about tagging for someone who doesn't use del.icio.us.
I'd like to be able to tag something email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
have it relayed to myfriend via email. There may be spam or bandwith
gotchas that would prevent
tim baker wrote:
you can search the archives with google:
http://www.google.ca/search?q=site%3Alists.del.icio.us
Tim, I hope I don't mean no disrespect. but I always find it amusing when I hear a suggestion to use Google's 'site:lists.site.com' to search a list archive. Is Google really that
On 10/27/05, Marc Dugger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday, I asked about tagging for others using for:. It got me
thinking about tagging for someone who doesn't use del.icio.us.
I'd like to be able to tag something email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
have it relayed to myfriend via email. There
kooto (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
tim baker wrote:
you can search the archives with google:
http://www.google.ca/search?q=site%3Alists.del.icio.us
Tim, I hope I don't mean no disrespect. but I always find it amusing
when I hear a suggestion to use Google's 'site:lists.site.com' to
This idea has been suggested before, however I would like to second
it. I have on numerous occasions found that this would be
useful.
On another note, I would like to suggest that all 'for'-type tags be
classed in a separate bundle by default? I do this now manually
myself, because it is a real
9 matches
Mail list logo
