What would be most interesting would be a geneology for discovery...
i.e. via:... via:... via:... enabling you to trace something all the
way back up the chain. This would lend itself to some very interesting
"six degrees" visualizations... who knows, maybe we're down to 4
degrees by now.
Chris
I'd like to be able to specify via information as a separate
field such (e.g. like the extended field).
I don't know if it would turn out to be useful, but I'm interested
in seeing what can be done with chains of via information.
On 8/24/05, Edward Vielmetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like vi
I like via: tags, and the few people who have noticed
seem to like them.
On 8/23/05, joshua schachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not at the current time; most people don't care. If you want to
> pretend, you can just make via: tags.
>
> Joshua
>
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 11:23 PM, Kishore Balakris
Not at the current time; most people don't care. If you want to
pretend, you can just make via: tags.
Joshua
On Aug 23, 2005, at 11:23 PM, Kishore Balakrishnan wrote:
Greetings,
Are there any plans to provide"via" / "from"
when "copy"ing an item, this tag could be automatically propose
4 matches
Mail list logo
