[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] tpm2-tss: update to 2.3.2

2020-02-08 Thread akuster
clean up reciped. drop git fetching Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- .../{tpm2-tss_2.3.1.bb => tpm2-tss_2.3.2.bb} | 18 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) rename meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-tss/{tpm2-tss_2.3.1.bb => tpm2-tss_2.3.2.bb} (72%) diff --git

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] tpm2-tcti-uefi: fix build issue for i386 machine

2020-02-08 Thread akuster
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- .../files/fix_header_file.patch | 25 + .../files/tpm2-get-caps-fixed.patch | 23 +++ ...p-inserting-host-directories-into-co.patch | 13 - .../tpm2-tcti-uefi/tpm2-tcti-uefi_0.9.9.bb| 28

Re: [yocto] more nitpicky pedantry: question about DEFAULT_PREFERENCE

2020-02-08 Thread rpj...@crashcourse.ca
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: ... snip ... > which seems odd as there don't appear to be any other recipes that > provide pkgconfig, and AIUI, the default provider for any recipe is > the recipe with *exactly* the same name as the target -- in this case, > "pkgconfig". ...

[yocto] more nitpicky pedantry: question about DEFAULT_PREFERENCE

2020-02-08 Thread rpj...@crashcourse.ca
(part of the nitpickiness of some of these questions stems from that, in my updated courseware, i want to use actual examples out of, say, the openembedded layer, and not just contrived examples involving packages like "foo" and "bar". to that end, i want to be able to explain why some recipes

Re: [yocto] clarifying "PROVIDES =" versus "PROVIDES +=" (pedantic stuff)

2020-02-08 Thread rpj...@crashcourse.ca
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, Jonatan Palsson wrote: > Hello Robert & Leon, > > > So I think it might be harmful to replace it with "=", as it would no > > longer provide libpcre. > > I had a look at the variable expansions bitbake -e. Here are two > examples. The vim recipe uses "PROVIDES = xxd" (which

Re: [yocto] clarifying "PROVIDES =" versus "PROVIDES +=" (pedantic stuff)

2020-02-08 Thread Jonatan PĂ„lsson
Hello Robert & Leon, > So I think it might be harmful to replace it with "=", as it would no > longer provide libpcre. I had a look at the variable expansions bitbake -e. Here are two examples. The vim recipe uses "PROVIDES = xxd" (which would cause weird effects if = simply overwrote any

Re: [yocto] clarifying "PROVIDES =" versus "PROVIDES +=" (pedantic stuff)

2020-02-08 Thread rpj...@crashcourse.ca
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello Robert, > > > i am *assuming* that, in the absence of a compelling reason, the use > > of "+=" instead of "=" in this context is harmless, but unnecessary, > > correct? > > > My understanding is that: > > >

Re: [yocto] clarifying "PROVIDES =" versus "PROVIDES +=" (pedantic stuff)

2020-02-08 Thread Leon Woestenberg
Hello Robert, > i am *assuming* that, in the absence of a compelling reason, the use > of "+=" instead of "=" in this context is harmless, but unnecessary, > correct? > My understanding is that: > meta/recipes-support/libpcre/libpcre_8.43.bb:PROVIDES += "pcre" means "I provide both "libpcre"

[yocto] clarifying "PROVIDES =" versus "PROVIDES +=" (pedantic stuff)

2020-02-08 Thread rpj...@crashcourse.ca
(currently updating my OE/YP courseware, so the first in a number of admittedly pedantic questions about simple stuff, just to make absolutely sure i understand things if i'm going to be explaining it to others. if appropriate, i can submit patches to the official YP docs if others think it's