Re: [yocto] EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz support

2022-11-01 Thread Bills, Jason M
Hi Quentin, Thanks for the reply!  Sorry for my delay back. :)  I haven't been able to fully reproduce this on poky, but I got a little more info. First, we are still seeing the issue with EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz:append failing to apply. We are using Langdale and Kirkstone worked fine for

Re: [yocto] EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz support

2022-10-27 Thread Quentin Schulz via lists.yoctoproject.org
Hi Jason, Sorry for the delay, your mail got lost in my pile of to-answer that never slims down apparently. On 10/19/22 00:48, Bills, Jason M wrote: Hello, Just checking if EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz:append failing to apply is expected or if it should be fixed? I just tested on

Re: [yocto] EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz support

2022-10-18 Thread Bills, Jason M
Hello, Just checking if EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz:append failing to apply is expected or if it should be fixed? Thanks again, -Jason -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#58361): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/58361

[yocto] EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz support

2022-09-29 Thread Bills, Jason M
Hello, I work on OpenBMC and am having an issue with EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz. There was a recent change pulled into OpenBMC in image_types.bbclass. In the old file, IMAGE_CMD:squashfs-xz was defined directly: IMAGE_CMD:squashfs-xz = "mksquashfs ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}