Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-14 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 13 May 2020, Richard Leitner wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:25:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > ... > > > If it's really widely used, maybe something to add to > > openembedded-core/files/common-licenses/ ? So

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Quentin Schulz
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:53:12AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: [...] > > it gets weirder ... the project i'm working with is based on morty > so that variable *would* still be relevant, but even adding > "Unlicense" to that variable didn't stop the offending recipe > from still generating a

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 13 May 2020, Quentin Schulz wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:40:28AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Wed, 13 May 2020, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:19:59AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13 May 2020, Richard

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Quentin Schulz
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:40:28AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2020, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:19:59AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 May 2020, Richard Leitner wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 13 May 2020, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:19:59AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Wed, 13 May 2020, Richard Leitner wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:25:01AM -0400,

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Quentin Schulz
Hi Robert, On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:19:59AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2020, Richard Leitner wrote: > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:25:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > If it's

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 13 May 2020, Richard Leitner wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:25:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > ... > > > If it's really widely used, maybe something to add to > > openembedded-core/files/common-licenses/ ? So

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 13 May 2020, Quentin Schulz wrote: ... snip ... > If it's really widely used, maybe something to add to > openembedded-core/files/common-licenses/ ? So that you don't need > any of the suggested ways? that was one of the first things that came to mind ... if there are enough packages

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Richard Leitner
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:25:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: ... > If it's really widely used, maybe something to add to > openembedded-core/files/common-licenses/ ? So that you don't need any of > the suggested ways? +1 for

Re: [yocto] what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

2020-05-13 Thread Quentin Schulz
Hi Robert, On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:25:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > colleague added a new recipe to a build, got a warning "The license > listed Unlicense was not in the licenses collected for recipe > python-filelock" and, sure enough, that source was released under the >