Upstream is dropping support for is not set, so we adjust our
configs accordingly.
Commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git/commit/?h=for-next=55de8686df7ed2b5237867b130e30c728bbd9db4
Signed-off-by: He Zhe
---
bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15.cfg | 2
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.4.4.rc1.
We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2. BSP-hw
Runtime auto test for following platforms:
1. MinnowTurbot 32-bit
2. NUC 7
3. NUC 6
4.
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 12:08 +0100, Abongwa Amahnui Bonalais wrote:
>
> +
> +def add_banner_old_docs(dir):
> +exclude = []
> +for root, dirs, filenames in os.walk(dir):
> + # exclude banner for 3.1.x upward as it is an LTS release and is
> still supported
> +exclude = [
*Wiki: *https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage
*Attendees: *Randy, Richard, Luca Ceresoli, Bruce Ashfield, Michael
Opdenacker, Ross Burton, Steve Sakoman, Tim Orling, Joshua Watt, Pavel,
Aryaman Gupta
*ARs:*
Randy: talk to David Reyna to reassign his toaster bugs
Richard: review the
Demo apps is the least of the worst. They also add benchmarks, make
tweaks to components that are in distribution (rather than hardware
support) scope, and even go ahead and define their own distributions,
and then make it impossible or very difficult to separate the distro
from the BSP. Oh, and
BSP is not a well defined term in embedded Linux. Back in the day, Montavista
tried to popularise the term LSP, meaning Linux Support Package but it never
caught on. These days, BSP generally means all the things you need to run a
basic system. So that's bootloader, device tree, kernel config,
OK, let me try this:
With other embedded OS's, the hardware specifics that are in the BSP are
in the device trees in Linux. I assume the BSP's for OE Linux are rather
simple?
On 2022-05-05 04:47, Josef Holzmayr wrote:
Howdy!
Am Do., 5. Mai 2022 um 10:43 Uhr schrieb jchludzinski via
Howdy!
Am Do., 5. Mai 2022 um 10:43 Uhr schrieb jchludzinski via
lists.yoctoproject.org
:
>
> OK, let's go with that.
>
> I've watched the "Live Coding with Yocto Project #1: download and first
> build" youtube video. Where is the BSP built in this procedure?
The BSP that is implicitly used in
OK, let's go with that.
I've watched the "Live Coding with Yocto Project #1: download and first
build" youtube video. Where is the BSP built in this procedure?
On 2022-05-05 03:16, Michael Opdenacker via lists.yoctoproject.org
wrote:
On 5/5/22 08:39, jchludzinski via
On 5/5/22 08:39, jchludzinski via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> A board-support-package (BSP) is software that provides a layer of
> abstraction from the physical board specifics for the host embedded OS
> (e.g., VXworks).
>
> I believe the device tree files (*.dts, *dtsi) in OE Linux provide
A board-support-package (BSP) is software that provides a layer of
abstraction from the physical board specifics for the host embedded OS
(e.g., VXworks).
I believe the device tree files (*.dts, *dtsi) in OE Linux provide the
same function. It allows to OE kernel code to be independent of
On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 01:15 +, Teoh, Jay Shen wrote:
> Hi TSC,
>
> Intel and WR are good for QA execution.
> Shall we proceed?
Yes please, the TSC is concerned but doesn't believe there is much we can do
about these issues and that they shouldn't affect the release quality.
Cheers,
12 matches
Mail list logo
