Hi all,
This is the weekly bug trend for WW20. The new submitted vs. fixed bug
number is 23 vs. 16. WDD number and Open Bug number increased a little, as 932
and 191. Bug status of WW20 could be found on
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Bug_Trend.
Best Regards,
Jiajun
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tomas Frydrych
tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote:
Hi,
On 19/05/12 22:51, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
After an exchange of messages with Richard, Saul and John Willis (he
already started a layer for oe and did a good job in it) i want to
announce that i
On 05/21/2012 12:19 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2012 11:47:15 Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 19/05/12 22:51, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
After an exchange of messages with Richard, Saul and John Willis (he
already started a layer for
Hi Paul,
For example parsing libav and rpi-zram-service will fail. We don't
have libav and we don't have systemd yet in poky.
OK, sure, that isn't ideal - however meta-ti suffers from this issue as
well,
and they have instructions in the layer README which tell people the
BBMASK they can
On Monday 21 May 2012 16:16:47 John Willis wrote:
For example parsing libav and rpi-zram-service will fail. We don't
have libav and we don't have systemd yet in poky.
OK, sure, that isn't ideal - however meta-ti suffers from this issue as
well, and they have instructions in the layer
Hi Paul,
That had been my plan but I got the impression that was frowned up in
the Yocto environment.
Well, IMHO it's suboptimal, but far less so than two separate competing
layers that ultimately exist for the same purpose.
Pushed a note in the README with suggestions on a suitable
On 2012-05-21 09:34, John Willis wrote:
Hi Paul,
That had been my plan but I got the impression that was frowned up in
the Yocto environment.
Well, IMHO it's suboptimal, but far less so than two separate competing
layers that ultimately exist for the same purpose.
Pushed a note in the
Or we can set up a distro file so that we can use it out of the box and in
case ppl want to use custom distros use BBMASK. A pull request was sent
with some other stuff as well.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
On 2012-05-21 09:34, John Willis wrote:
Hi
So, I have run into three issues with the meta-raspberrypi layer when
trying use it with Poky:
* the libav bbappend; this can be BBMASKED on distro level, so that's
not a significant problem,
* rpi-zram-service: a simple but rather hackish fix is to provide
rpi-zram-service-initd package that
Hi Kishore,
Looks like you're missing PR bumps for these...
Tom
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:52 -0700, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Point to the latest version of PVR Graphics
driver.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
From: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Pointing to the latest version of PVR
Graphics drivers for the Cedartrail BSP.
Please pull into meta-intel/denzil
Thanks
Kishore.
The following changes since commit 7c1086df3f92d76ca1a062f9b4b1daf6823bfb63:
emgd-driver-bin: skip insane ldflags
From: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Point to the latest version of PVR Graphics
driver.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
---
.../xorg-driver/cdv-pvr-driver.inc | 14 +++---
.../xorg-driver/cdv-pvr-driver_1.0.bb | 46
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 23:02 -0400, Chris Hallinan wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 17:38 -0400, Chris Hallinan wrote:
Note: this patch has already been submitted against other BSPs,
originally submitted to oe-core by Gary
= raspberrypi
DISTRO= poky
DISTRO_VERSION= 1.2+snapshot-20120521
TUNE_FEATURES = armv6 vfp arm1176jzfs
TARGET_FPU= vfp
meta
meta-yocto= master:**f24d8df3af52e2a2911233746ad69f**8899bbdf93
meta-raspberrypi = master:**d1e802561ab5c70680fd6ee70a4779**1fe78aa977
When
= arm
TARGET_OS = linux-gnueabi
MACHINE = raspberrypi
DISTRO= poky
DISTRO_VERSION= 1.2+snapshot-20120521
TUNE_FEATURES = armv6 vfp arm1176jzfs
TARGET_FPU= vfp
meta
meta-yocto= master
DISTRO_VERSION= 1.2+snapshot-20120521
TUNE_FEATURES = armv6 vfp arm1176jzfs
TARGET_FPU= vfp
meta
meta-yocto= master:f24d8df3af52e2a2911233746ad69f8899bbdf93
meta-raspberrypi = master:d1e802561ab5c70680fd6ee70a47791fe78aa977
When I ran 'bitbake core-image-sato', I got
= raspberrypi
DISTRO= poky
DISTRO_VERSION= 1.2+snapshot-20120521
TUNE_FEATURES = armv6 vfp arm1176jzfs
TARGET_FPU= vfp
meta
meta-yocto= master:f24d8df3af52e2a2911233746ad69f8899bbdf93
meta-raspberrypi = master:d1e802561ab5c70680fd6ee70a47791fe78aa977
When I ran
After seeing:
After an exchange of messages with Richard, Saul and John Willis ... i
started start a fork ...
I thought this was now 'the' meta-layer for the RPi. Is that not the case? It
really would make sense for everyone to pull in the same direction.
Chris Tapp
Yes it is. Forget that.
We decided to use a single layer for both distros.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.comwrote:
After seeing:
After an exchange of messages with Richard, Saul and John Willis ... i
started start a fork ...
I thought this was now
Hello,
I am trying to install an image of Yocto to my CRB (cedartrail). After
creating the bootable usb with the new image on it as a usb-zip
(because it is too large for the hdd method of install), I insert it
into one of the usb slots of my CRB. After turning the CRB on the
prompt says boot. At
When libraries are installed in ${libdir}/${BPN} we need to ensure that
those libraries without version number end up in the -dev package. If not
the error ERROR: QA Issue: non -dev/-dbg/-nativesdk package contains
symlink .so: is encountered.
A change like this is required since package named
Agenda
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* 1.2.1 update - 10 min (ScottG)
* 1.1.2 update - 10 min (Josh)
* Yocto 1.3 status - 10 min (Song/team)
- 1.3 feature list: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.3_Features
- 1.3 schedule: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.3_Schedule
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 23:02 -0400, Chris Hallinan wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 17:38 -0400, Chris Hallinan wrote:
Note: this patch has already
23 matches
Mail list logo
