Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache] [PATCH 0/4] Enable more kernel driver features for Broxton

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:31 AM, wrote: > From: "Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun" > > Hi Bruce, > > Broxton supports the following kernel driver features: > - LPC bridge for Intel ICH and SCH > - iSMT support > - iTCO watchdog > I have

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] Set MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM for Broxton controllers

On 2016-08-09 9:43 PM, Pranav Tipnis wrote: Hi Bruce, Resubmitting a patch for storage driver to enable aggressive PM for Broxton. This is for bxt-rebase branch. merged to linux-yocto-4.4 standard/intel/bxt-rebase. Bruce Adrian Hunter (1): mmc: sdhci-pci: Set MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM for

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] Set MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM for Broxton controllers

Hi Bruce, Resubmitting a patch for storage driver to enable aggressive PM for Broxton. This is for bxt-rebase branch. Adrian Hunter (1): mmc: sdhci-pci: Set MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM for Broxton controllers drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pci: Set MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM for Broxton controllers

From: Adrian Hunter Upstream-Staus: Submitted [https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8809631/] Set MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM for Broxton host controllers. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3

Re: [linux-yocto] missing MMC patches on bxt-rebase tree

On 2016-08-09 4:36 PM, Renganathan, Prabu wrote: Hi Bruce, I see some patches were submitted for storage driver to enable aggressive PM for Broxton. One of the patch in the below series I don’t see it merged in bxt-rebase tree. Patch series:

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, June 7, 2016 8:00 AM US Pacific Time

On 08/09/2016 12:36 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:17 AM, akuster808 wrote: >> >> On 8/3/16 6:19 AM, Philip Balister wrote: >>> >>> On 08/02/2016 11:23 AM, Jolley, Stephen K wrote: Attendees: Saul, David Wolfe, Joshua, Belen, Ross, Mark, Bill >>>

[linux-yocto] missing MMC patches on bxt-rebase tree

Hi Bruce, I see some patches were submitted for storage driver to enable aggressive PM for Broxton. One of the patch in the below series I don't see it merged in bxt-rebase tree. Patch series: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg04622.html missing patch in bxt-rebase

[yocto] Power button not shutting down the OS

Hey guys, I am having an issue with trying to get my power button (i.MX6) to shutdown the OS. My kernel has no configuration options for acpi, and acpid gives me the following error: --- root@seco-uq7-dl-256mbx4:~# /usr/sbin/acpid RTNETLINK1 answers: No such file or directory acpid: error

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, June 7, 2016 8:00 AM US Pacific Time

> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:17 AM, akuster808 wrote: > > On 8/3/16 6:19 AM, Philip Balister wrote: >> >> On 08/02/2016 11:23 AM, Jolley, Stephen K wrote: >>> Attendees: Saul, David Wolfe, Joshua, Belen, Ross, Mark, Bill >>> >> >> >>>Poky - LTS/LTM Branch >>>

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH] nightly-musl.conf: add world build

Add world build for musl. [YOCTO #10105] Signed-off-by: Bill Randle --- buildset-config.controller/nightly-musl.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/buildset-config.controller/nightly-musl.conf

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH] SendQAEmail.py: use sendmail instead of mail to send QA email

When sending QA emails, the autobuilder uses the 'mail' command (typically installed as /usr/bin/mail or /bin/mail). However, most distributions do not install this program by default. They generally always install the 'sendmail' program, though, so use 'sendmail' as the mail agent, rather than

Re: [yocto] How to build yocto as a root user?

Yocto includes pseudo which handles the things fakeroot does and a bit more https://www.yoctoproject.org/tools-resources/projects/pseudo. -brian an Intel employee On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Jan Lindåker wrote: > > > From:

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] binutils 2.27

On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 07:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > I could also see it on ppc. backtrace, shows the segfault is in exit > path and happens in libc > at this point, I think the problem is how libc is compiled with > binutils 2.27, connman itself > is ok. Its the issue here:

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] binutils 2.27

> On Aug 8, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On 8 August 2016 at 16:59, Richard Purdie > wrote: > FWIW, I think the connmand segfault on mips and powerpc is hinted at > with this

Re: [yocto] How to build yocto as a root user?

From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org on behalf of Philip Balister Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:39 To: jags gediya; yocto@yoctoproject.org; meta-freesc...@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] How

Re: [yocto] How to build yocto as a root user?

On 08/09/2016 09:32 AM, jags gediya wrote: > I am facing issues while build yocto as root user on ubuntu 14.04. > How can i build as a root user? Do not do this, it is a terrible idea. Create a user account and build there. Philip > > > -- ___

[yocto] How to build yocto as a root user?

I am facing issues while build yocto as root user on ubuntu 14.04. How can i build as a root user? -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] augeas: Move to meta-python optional layer

Augeas lives in meta-python, but meta-selinux shouldn't specifically require meta-python in every build, so make the bbappend optional using the standard mechanism already present in the layer.conf. Signed-off-by: Joe MacDonald ---

[yocto] useradd does not creates user in rootfs but sysroot ?

Dear Team, Downloaded " krogoth" release , with intension to use the above bb file to create users( user1,user2 etc.) The expectation was that the users should get created in the "rootfs" . But to dismay, this get created in the sysroot (poky/build/tmp/sysroots/qemux86/etc/passwd).

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, June 7, 2016 8:00 AM US Pacific Time

* akuster808 [160803 17:18]: > On 8/3/16 6:19 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > > On 08/02/2016 11:23 AM, Jolley, Stephen K wrote: > >> Attendees: Saul, David Wolfe, Joshua, Belen, Ross, Mark, Bill > > > >> Poky - LTS/LTM Branch > >> - Community Driven >

Re: [yocto] What is the simplest way to test a new kernel configuration in a Yocto Project?

Hi, On 2016-08-09 07:20, Daniel. wrote: Hi Patrick, If you are running your image embedded at some board, and have easy access to the board, you can plug it to network and make u-boot download kernel from your machine. So that deploy a new kernel becomes simple as copy the new kernel to the