[yocto] FW: cmake version 3.0.0 or greater

Hi Yocto Gurus Our SDK has the Yocto Project 1.7 Dizzy version and it supports cmake 2.8.12 version as show below: ./meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake_2.8.12.2.bb ./meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.12.2.bb We need to pulling the cmake 3.x.x version for our sdk-dslink-c recipe

Re: [yocto] Question about wic partition creation

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:14:48AM -0400, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote: > We are using Yocto (jethro and krogoth) to build an image for a device. > > I organized the compilation process into multiple stages for easier > integration with our tooling. The last stage is a call to `wic` to > create a

[linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache] [PATCH] Enable Intel PMIC TMU config

Hello Bruce, This change enables Intel PMIC TMU config as module on broxton platform. This change is targeted for yocto-4.4 branch. Nilesh Bacchewar (1): Broxton: Enable PMIC TMU module features/power/intel_pmic.cfg | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) -- 1.9.1 --

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] Broxton: Enable PMIC TMU module

Enable Intel Whiskey Cove PMIC TMU driver as module. Signed-off-by: Nilesh Bacchewar --- features/power/intel_pmic.cfg | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/features/power/intel_pmic.cfg b/features/power/intel_pmic.cfg index 4b2472b..ba47aa5 100644

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] platform: x86: Add Whiskey Cove PMIC TMU support

Backport: - Submitted upstream [https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9415995/] - Backport fix. This adds TMU (Time Management Unit) support for Intel BXT platform. It enables the alarm wake-up functionality in the TMU unit of Whiskey Cove PMIC. Signed-off-by: Nilesh Bacchewar

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] x86/platform: Add Whiskey Cove PMIC TMU support

Backports this patch on linux-yocto-4.4. Patch has been submitted upstream and the approval is in progress, hence may not be final. Patch has been rebased on bxt-rebase branch. Nilesh Bacchewar (1): platform: x86: Add Whiskey Cove PMIC TMU support drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c | 38

Re: [yocto] UTF-89 support

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:24:18 Khem Raj wrote: >> On 11/7/16 3:48 AM, Keskinarkaus, Teemu wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > I tried googling this and reading the manual, but I guess this is too >> > trivial or

Re: [yocto] UTF-89 support

On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:24:18 Khem Raj wrote: > On 11/7/16 3:48 AM, Keskinarkaus, Teemu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I tried googling this and reading the manual, but I guess this is too > > trivial or I’m doing something wrong. > > > > > > > > I’m trying to get UTF-8 support to my image.

Re: [yocto] How to handle meta-intel/openembedded repos with multiple developers

Hi, How you store your project configuration ? How you prepare workspace (download each layer separately)? Basic stuff, SW release should be reproducible (in easy way). Store somewhere used hash of each piece or use tags. Non company assets should be already somehow tagged or you use HEAD or

Re: [yocto] Supported "init" types

> From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com] > Sent: November 07, 2016 12:37 > > On 11/7/16 9:27 AM, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote: > > I see that “sysvinit” and “systemd” style init is supported. > > > > > > > > Is there support for BSD-style init, or some other minimal init? > > > > > > there

Re: [yocto] Supported "init" types

On 11/7/16 9:27 AM, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote: > I see that “sysvinit” and “systemd” style init is supported. > > > > Is there support for BSD-style init, or some other minimal init? > > there is busybox/mdev init option in OE-core if you are looking for a minimal init and not

[yocto] Supported "init" types

I see that "sysvinit" and "systemd" style init is supported. Is there support for BSD-style init, or some other minimal init? Does anyone know of such support in a separate layer? MV -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] UTF-89 support

On 11/7/16 3:48 AM, Keskinarkaus, Teemu wrote: > Hi, > > > > I tried googling this and reading the manual, but I guess this is too trivial > or I’m doing something wrong. > > > > I’m trying to get UTF-8 support to my image. UTF-8 locale more specific. If I > run locale –a command I get

Re: [linux-yocto] Pull request: Fix compile error when enable CONFIG_CRYPTODEV

On 2016-11-06 09:52 PM, Song liwei wrote: summary: This two patches use to fix the compile error when enable CONFIG_CRYPTODEV Thanks. I've pushed these patches. SRCREV updates will follow, but the changes are now available for anyone that needs them. Bruce Testing Commands:

Re: [yocto] Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros

Hi Scott, On 3 November 2016 at 20:21, Scott Rifenbark wrote: > See http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref- > manual.html#detailed-supported-distros and let me know if this is okay. > If so, I will make sure the same commit is on my yocto-docs/morty branch. >

Re: [yocto] UTF-89 support

2016-11-07 9:48 GMT-02:00 Keskinarkaus, Teemu : > Hi, > > > > I tried googling this and reading the manual, but I guess this is too > trivial or I’m doing something wrong. > > > > I’m trying to get UTF-8 support to my image. UTF-8 locale more specific. If > I

[yocto] UTF-89 support

Hi, I tried googling this and reading the manual, but I guess this is too trivial or I'm doing something wrong. I'm trying to get UTF-8 support to my image. UTF-8 locale more specific. If I run locale -a command I get these locales listed: C POSIX en_GB en_US I added this line to my

[yocto] [PATCH] ref-manual: fix typo

Signed-off-by: Andrea Galbusera --- documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-advanced.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-advanced.xml b/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-advanced.xml index 9e15f17..ed982fb

Re: [yocto] Yocto "Long Term Support"

On 7 November 2016 at 09:09, Burton, Ross wrote: > Currently the Yocto Project commits to supporting the previous two > releases with security fixes. If you want a longer life-cycle than that > then it is recommended to approach one of the many OSVs who support Yocto >

Re: [yocto] Yocto "Long Term Support"

On 6 November 2016 at 15:33, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote: > Has there ever been any discussion of making select releases > > “Long Term Support” releases, i.e., committing to support them > > for a number of years? > > > > Presumably that would entail having the resources to