On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 04:00 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 21:09 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> > >
> > > common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to
> > > review
> > > doesn't comes with recip
Hi all
I have submitted a new layer named meta-spdxscanner that can be used to create
spdx files to the OpenEmbedded layer index.
Compared to the spdx module in oe-core, this layer has features as following:
* Easy to use
Dosocs2-native has been add into this meta, there is no need to inst
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 21:09 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> >
> > common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to
> > review
> > doesn't comes with recipes that changes the signatures.
> I have a question about the goal fo
This change calls the tablecheckbox.js plugin to add functionality
in a patch-list to allow user to select single / multiple / all
table row(s) by clicking.
[YOCTO #10819]
Signed-off-by: Jose Lamego
---
patchwork/templates/patchwork/patch-list.html | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff
Selecting multiple items in a patch list must be done manually,
one item at a time, resulting in a poor user experience.
This change adds the jquery.tablecheckbox.js plugin that allows
to select single / multiple / all table row(s) by clicking.
[YOCTO #10819]
Signed-off-by: Jose Lamego
---
ht
Selecting multiple patches in a range at the series view must be
performed on one-by-one basis, providing apoor user-experience.
This change allows to select patches in a range by clicking the
first patch, then shift-clicking the last patch in the desired range.
[YOCTO #10819]
Signed-off-by: Jos
Selecting multiple items in a patch list must be done manually,
one item at a time, providing a poor user experience.
These changes add the jquery.tablecheckbox plugin and call it from
the patch-list tables to allow users to select single / multiple / all
table row(s) by clicking.
A function spec
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 14:33 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
>
> On 02/28/2017 02:09 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> >> common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to review
> >> doesn't comes with recipes that changes the signa
The OE-Core LICENSE is mostly MIT, but should not be used as a checksum
file for a purely MIT licensed package.
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
recipes-qt4/images/qt4e-demo-image.bb | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes-qt4/images/qt4e-demo-image.bb
b/recipe
The OE-Core LICENSE is mostly MIT, but should not be used as a checksum
file for a purely MIT licensed package.
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
recipes-qt4/qt-demo/qt-demo-init_0.1.bb | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes-qt4/qt-demo/qt-demo-init_0.1.bb
b/re
The following two recipes use the OE-Core License file in additional
to the COPYING.MIT, these are really purely MIT so don't use the OE-Core
LICENSE file.
This was discovered when a clarification statement was added to the
OE-Core LICENSE file.
Sau!
Saul Wold (2):
qt-demo-init: LICENSE is st
On 02/28/2017 02:09 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
>> common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to review
>> doesn't comes with recipes that changes the signatures.
>
> I have a question about the goal for this test: is i
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to review
> doesn't comes with recipes that changes the signatures.
I have a question about the goal for this test: is it meant to detect
layers which incorrectly change the
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:27 AM praveen vattipalli
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using krogoth branch of meta-altera.
> in meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass file
> SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS += "do_kernel_configme do_validate_branches
> do_kernel_configcheck do_kernel_checkout do_shared_workdir do_fetch
> do_unpa
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 17:57 +0530, praveen vattipalli wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using krogoth branch of meta-altera.
> in meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass file
> SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS += "do_kernel_configme do_validate_branches
> do_kernel_configcheck do_kernel_checkout do_shared_workdir do_fetch
> do_unp
Hi,
I am using krogoth branch of meta-altera.
in meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass file
SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS += "do_kernel_configme do_validate_branches
do_kernel_configcheck do_kernel_checkout do_shared_workdir do_fetch
do_unpack do_patch"
if i remove "do_shared_workdir" . it worked. is this the r
Advice on how to proceed with this?
Current Yocto (morty) kernels include 4.1, 4.4 that work and 4.8 that doesn't.
Intermittent hang during power-on kernel boots before/without any diagnostic
output. Can I compile the kernel to output more than boot options allow?
I could fix this BSP to 4.4 (
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
>
> Update the remaining references to kernel version 3.19 to version 4.4,
> restricted to the section "kernel-dev-common.xml".
>
> I just sent a patch to drop 4.4 from master.
On 28 February 2017 at 02:09, akuster808 wrote:
> o rpm v4/dnf to replace rpm v5/smart?
>
> IMHO, we should include dnf in 2.3 so folks can start playing with it and
> remove smart in 2.4.
Not possible: dnf requires rpm4. In the current work there is no attempt
at letting the user pick rpm4
On 02/28/2017 04:09 AM, akuster808 wrote:
>> o rpm v4/dnf to replace rpm v5/smart?
>>
> IMHO, we should include dnf in 2.3 so folks can start playing with it
> and remove smart in 2.4.
Apologies, but there will not be a transitional period for this. Making
smart and dnf coexist is hard and wil
20 matches
Mail list logo
