Re: [yocto] Can Yocto treat layers like an external package?

Il 25 mag 2017 6:12 AM, "Trevor Woerner" ha scritto: Hi Yannick, This is a feature many people have been wanting for a while, but getting there has been slow. So slow, in fact, that many projects have simply gone ahead and implemented their own solutions, all of which are

Re: [yocto] sstate-cache question

On 2017-05-23 07:27, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2017-05-22 22:35, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi Gary, On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 2:53:45 AM NZST Gary Thomas wrote: I have a build where I've never manually removed anything from the sstate-cache and this same build has been used for hundreds of builds over

Re: [yocto] webkitgtk2 progress bar

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > My "bitbake world" builds have few components like this, webkitgtk (used to > have webkit1, webkit2 and webkit2-efl as separate builds), 2 chromiums (x11 > and wayland), cef (luckily broken and whitelisted for a

Re: [yocto] Can Yocto treat layers like an external package?

Hi Yannick, This is a feature many people have been wanting for a while, but getting there has been slow. So slow, in fact, that many projects have simply gone ahead and implemented their own solutions, all of which are different from each other, making it all that much harder to get everyone

Re: [yocto] How to include libraries?

On 2017-05-24 15:49, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2017-05-24 15:26, Burton, Ross wrote: On 24 May 2017 at 13:20, Gary Thomas > wrote: I have an image which needs to include the libcups2 package from the cups recipe. If I try adding this to my

[yocto] [meta-selinux] [PATCH] audit: 2.7.1 -> 2.7.6

Upgrade audit from 2.7.1 to 2.7.6 Signed-off-by: zhengrq --- recipes-security/audit/{audit_2.7.1.bb => audit_2.7.6.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename recipes-security/audit/{audit_2.7.1.bb => audit_2.7.6.bb} (96%) diff --git

Re: [yocto] dynamic-layers?

Hello. >e.g. if you have meta-qt5 in BBLAYERS in /conf/bblayers.conf, then the >recipes from "dynamic-layers/qt5-layer" are used as well. Thanks now I can see how it is expected to work. My issue here now is that some dynamyc-layers/ not being added to BBFILES list. I tried '-e' switch with

Re: [yocto] [layerindex-web][PATCH] views: support querying by layer name

Hi Jose, Sorry for the extreme delay reviewing this. On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:31:29 AM NZST Jose Lamego wrote: > This change supports querying recipes that belong to a specific layer > by using the prefix "layer:" + the desired layer name, for example: > "layer: openembedded-core" and this

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > I'd check with Marex the u-boot maintainer also. He may have something > queued up. It is entirely possible he isn't on this list. Good point. Marek just posted a 2017.05 update to oecore :-) --

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

On 05/24/2017 11:05 AM, Romain Perier wrote: > Hello, > > > Le 24/05/2017 à 16:55, Trevor Woerner a écrit : >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier >> wrote: >>> Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit : u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10.

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

Hi Romain, On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Romain Perier wrote: > Le 24/05/2017 à 16:55, Trevor Woerner a écrit : >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier >> wrote: >>> Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit :

Re: [yocto] webkitgtk2 progress bar

> I have 22 cores here, and it is not a luxury, but an absolute necessity to get anything done as far as oe-core maintenance goes. Webkit's do_compile takes about half an hour - I can almost see that progress bar move :) Heh, you're lucky with "oe-core maintenance". My "bitbake world" builds

Re: [yocto] webkitgtk2 progress bar

On 05/24/2017 05:45 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: You can try to use gold to save a bit of time linking the beast. webkit is already using gold by default, except for some architectures (aarch64, mips) where it used to fail - maybe it is not necessary anymore. Alex --

Re: [yocto] webkitgtk2 progress bar

On 05/24/2017 05:23 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: Now [tongue-in-cheek], can someone do something about the horrendous build times for such packages (webkitgtk2 can take up to 3 hours on my [no so slow] build host!)? In order of decreasing tongue in cheekiness. 1. Rewrite webkit in something that is

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip][PATCH] Fix unclosed file

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Frank Meerkoetter < meerkoet...@googlemail.com> wrote: > WARNING: /projects/meta-chip/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-chip_git.bb: > :14: ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.TextIOWrapper > name='/projects/meta-chip/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-chip/defconfig' > mode='r'

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip][PATCH] Fix missing LICENSE field for u-boot-chip

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Frank Meerkoetter < meerkoet...@googlemail.com> wrote: > ERROR: /projects/meta-chip/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-chip_git.bb: This > recipe does not have the LICENSE field set (u-boot-chip) > ERROR: Failed to parse recipe: /data/projects/rpi-a2dp-sink/ >

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

Hello, Le 24/05/2017 à 16:55, Trevor Woerner a écrit : > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier > wrote: >> Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit : >>> u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update >>> oe-core's u-boot to

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier wrote: > Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit : >> u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update >> oe-core's u-boot to 2017.05 then just add any differences in >> meta-rockchip? > > Good

Re: [yocto] Can Yocto treat layers like an external package?

On 2017-05-24 16:39, Koehler, Yannick (HPN Aruba) wrote: In our development with Yocto, we use vendor provided layers. At this time we have to pull those manually (using git or submodule or other technics) to get the vendor layer on disk before bitbake can start. Does Yocto allow to

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

Hello, Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit : > u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update > oe-core's u-boot to 2017.05 then just add any differences in > meta-rockchip? Good idea yes. I will bump u-boot-common_${PV} and u-boot_2017.01 to v2017.05 in poky (and

Re: [yocto] webkitgtk2 progress bar

You can try to use gold to save a bit of time linking the beast. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Leonardo Sandoval < leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 16:23 +0200, Gary Thomas wrote: > > I see that the latest master update has brought a progress bar > >

[yocto] Can Yocto treat layers like an external package?

In our development with Yocto, we use vendor provided layers. At this time we have to pull those manually (using git or submodule or other technics) to get the vendor layer on disk before bitbake can start. Does Yocto allow to automatically pull a yocto layer given a uri, branch and other

Re: [yocto] webkitgtk2 progress bar

On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 16:23 +0200, Gary Thomas wrote: > I see that the latest master update has brought a progress bar > for this (and presumably other 'cmake' based packages) - very nice :-) > > Now [tongue-in-cheek], can someone do something about the horrendous > build times for such packages

[yocto] webkitgtk2 progress bar

I see that the latest master update has brought a progress bar for this (and presumably other 'cmake' based packages) - very nice :-) Now [tongue-in-cheek], can someone do something about the horrendous build times for such packages (webkitgtk2 can take up to 3 hours on my [no so slow] build

Re: [yocto] dynamic-layers?

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Takashi Matsuzawa wrote: > Hello, Yocto. > I am a bit confused with dynamic-layers included in some of the recent > layers in various BSPs. > > e.g. > > https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/master/conf/layer.conf > >># The

Re: [yocto] dynamic-layers?

On 2017-05-24 12:30, Takashi Matsuzawa wrote: Hello, Yocto. I am a bit confused with dynamic-layers included in some of the recent layers in various BSPs. e.g. https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/master/conf/layer.conf ># The .bbappend and .bb files are included if the

[yocto] dynamic-layers?

Hello, Yocto. I am a bit confused with dynamic-layers included in some of the recent layers in various BSPs. e.g. https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/master/conf/layer.conf ># The .bbappend and .bb files are included if the respective layer ># collection is available. >BBFILES +=

Re: [yocto] How to include libraries?

On 2017-05-24 15:26, Burton, Ross wrote: On 24 May 2017 at 13:20, Gary Thomas > wrote: I have an image which needs to include the libcups2 package from the cups recipe. If I try adding this to my image recipe

Re: [yocto] How to include libraries?

On 24 May 2017 at 13:20, Gary Thomas wrote: > I have an image which needs to include the libcups2 package from > the cups recipe. If I try adding this to my image recipe > CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL_append = " libcups2" > I get this error: > ERROR: Required build target

[yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] core-image-cgl: Remove ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE_BOOTSTRAP

run-postinsts is now installed by default in image.bbclass, so no need to include it in each image. Signed-off-by: Adrian Dudau --- meta-cgl-common/images/core-image-cgl-initramfs.bb | 2 +- meta-cgl-common/images/core-image-cgl.bb | 1 - 2 files changed, 1

[yocto] How to include libraries?

I have an image which needs to include the libcups2 package from the cups recipe. If I try adding this to my image recipe CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL_append = " libcups2" I get this error: ERROR: Required build target 'my-demo-image' has no buildable providers. Missing or unbuildable