Re: [yocto] eSDK install script failure

On Friday, 22 September 2017 9:22:08 AM NZST Andrea Galbusera wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Paul Eggleton < > paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Right, so the next step would be looking for the hash for > > python-native.do_populate_sysroot in conf/locked_sigs.inc within the >

Re: [yocto] Path to current bb-file or layer

On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 22:00 +0200, Svein Seldal wrote: > To determine a image version, I'd like to read a VERSION file which > is  > located in the root of the layer. (Per our development procedure.) > I'd  > like to read it from a bbclass file. However I seem to be unable to > find  > any methods

Re: [yocto] Path to current bb-file or layer

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Svein Seldal wrote: > > To determine a image version, I'd like to read a VERSION file which is > located in the root of the layer. (Per our development procedure.) I'd like > to read it from a bbclass file. However I seem to be unable to find

Re: [yocto] eSDK install script failure

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Paul Eggleton < paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Friday, 22 September 2017 1:06:19 AM NZST Andrea Galbusera wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Andrea Galbusera > wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Paul Eggleton <

Re: [yocto] eSDK install script failure

On Friday, 22 September 2017 1:06:19 AM NZST Andrea Galbusera wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Paul Eggleton < > > paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 8:44:22 PM NZST

Re: [yocto] "(-)"??

On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 12:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > null and nothing can also be matched in MACHINE names, so to make sure > people should use: > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(^$)" > [trimmed] > > > > > > COMAPTIBLE_MACHINE uses regexp syntax > > > > Which actually makes that a pretty weird

[yocto] Path to current bb-file or layer

To determine a image version, I'd like to read a VERSION file which is located in the root of the layer. (Per our development procedure.) I'd like to read it from a bbclass file. However I seem to be unable to find any methods or variables to find a useful path to either the current bb-file

Re: [yocto] RFC: Backwards compatibility checking sstate-cache

On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 09:48 +, Michael Ho wrote: > Hi, at BMW Car IT we are working on an experimental feature to > improve sstate cache hits and we are looking for comments on the > approach who might have some insights to the problem and seeing if > anyone is interested in the feature for

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] intel-common-drivers: Add x2apic

On 09/21/2017 07:28 AM, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote: Dear maintainer, The Intel Denverton platform requires x2apic to boot hence the need to enable it in intel-common-drivers as a built-in feature I may have overlooked it in the patch, but what kernel versions is this for ?

Re: [yocto] eSDK install script failure

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: > Hi Paul, > thanks for explaining and helping sorting this out. > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Paul Eggleton < > paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi Andrea, >> >> On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 8:44:22

Re: [yocto] which is the official(?) OE/YP openbmc layer?

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 21 September 2017 at 11:01, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >   colleague just yesterday asked me a couple questions about openbmc, > so i investigated the OE/YP layer, and i'm a bit confused ... the > official OE

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] intel-common-drivers: adding x2apic

Included features/x2apic/x2apic.scc to enable x2apic as a built-in feature. Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif --- bsp/intel-common/intel-common-drivers.scc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] intel-common-drivers: Add x2apic

Dear maintainer, The Intel Denverton platform requires x2apic to boot hence the need to enable it in intel-common-drivers as a built-in feature Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif (1): intel-common: adding x2apic bsp/intel-common/intel-common-drivers.scc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1

Re: [yocto] Sysroot bug in bitbake or wrong configuration?

Perfect, that worked. On 21. sep. 2017 03:45, Andre McCurdy wrote: > Since image recipes don't have a do_configure task (or at least, they > do their work in tasks such as do_rootfs which don't depend on > do_configure), using the DEPENDS shorthand for setting dependencies > for the do_configure

Re: [yocto] "(-)"??

null and nothing can also be matched in MACHINE names, so to make sure people should use: COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(^$)" On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Peter Kjellerstedt < peter.kjellerst...@axis.com> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-

[yocto] Public key for U-Boot verified boot is not inserted in DTB when rebuilding from sstate

Hello, I have a problem with U-Boot verified boot and the sstate caching of build artifacts. On a clean rebuild (deleted sstate and tmp dir), the signed FIT image and U-Boot incl. the public key are correctly created. But when I delete the tmp dir and let bitbake recreate it from sstate, the

Re: [yocto] which is the official(?) OE/YP openbmc layer?

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 21 September 2017 at 11:01, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >   colleague just yesterday asked me a couple questions about openbmc, > so i investigated the OE/YP layer, and i'm a bit confused ... the > official OE

Re: [yocto] which is the official(?) OE/YP openbmc layer?

On 21 September 2017 at 11:01, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > colleague just yesterday asked me a couple questions about openbmc, > so i investigated the OE/YP layer, and i'm a bit confused ... the > official OE layers page here: > >

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH] CheckYoctoCompat.py: rename yocto-compat-layer to yocto-check-layer

On 21/09/17 09:47, Joshua Lock wrote: On 21/09/17 02:36, Stephano Cetola wrote: This script name was changed in the following commit: b46e05677b342df44829ffe8bcfbfc954e906030 This patch updates the script name to match. [YOCTO #12110] Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola

[yocto] which is the official(?) OE/YP openbmc layer?

colleague just yesterday asked me a couple questions about openbmc, so i investigated the OE/YP layer, and i'm a bit confused ... the official OE layers page here: https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ refers to a meta-openbmc layer at

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH] CheckYoctoCompat.py: rename yocto-compat-layer to yocto-check-layer

On 21/09/17 02:36, Stephano Cetola wrote: This script name was changed in the following commit: b46e05677b342df44829ffe8bcfbfc954e906030 This patch updates the script name to match. [YOCTO #12110] Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola ---

Re: [yocto] "(-)"??

> -Original Message- > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj > Sent: den 21 september 2017 07:15 > To: Takashi Matsuzawa ; yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [yocto] "(-)"?? > > On 9/20/17 8:18 PM,