I've a Intel Ethernet driver, ixgbe.ko. I made some changes (debug logs) to
the source file. How do I force the .ko to be regenerated within yocto
environment, without rebuilding the entire yocto code base?
I tried to do bitbake of the image name earlier, but bitbake decides that
there's
On 2018-10-12 7:03 PM, Li, Meng wrote:
Hi Bruce,
My pull request have been at the end of this email thread.
ahahah! I see it now.
The head part of pull request as below.
I push these patches into https://github.com/limeng-linux/linux-yocto-4.18.git,
on branch v4.18/standard/intel-socfpga.
Hi Bruce,
My pull request have been at the end of this email thread.
The head part of pull request as below.
I push these patches into https://github.com/limeng-linux/linux-yocto-4.18.git,
on branch v4.18/standard/intel-socfpga. A public repo.
Can you access them?
Or I need to send pull request
On 10/10/18 3:50 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> COPY relocs are fine to have in PIE executables (as opposed to
> shared libraries).
>
> By enabling prelink on PIEs we achieve a few goals:
> - prelink more PIE files on system: nicer for uniformity,
> - avoid spurious warnings about shared
Otherwise, there's no way to validate whether or not the operation
was actually successful without rescanning.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Russell
---
src/doit.c| 16 +++-
src/main.c| 8 +++-
src/prelink.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 10/12/18 9:06 AM, Kyle Russell wrote:
> Do you want me to just resent my last two patches? I don't mind if that would
> be easier, and I'll remember to add the Signed-off-by. :)
I was able to pull them from the mailing list archives and have them applied to
my local tree. I have a few other
On 10/10/2018 09:49 PM, meng...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Limeng
Hi Bruce,
I am working on BSP intel-socfpga.
Could you please help to create branch "v4.18/standard/intel-socfpga" in
linux-yocto kernel?
And then merge these kernel patches into this branch.
I created the branch, but the
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 18:14, Måns Zigher wrote:
> I have been struggling with a problem where I need to create a package in a
> recipe and set already-stripped for that package. The package in question is
> not the the default one so I am trying to set it by using
>
> INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += " \
Do you want me to just resent my last two patches? I don't mind if that
would be easier, and I'll remember to add the Signed-off-by. :)
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Mark Hatle
wrote:
> On 10/4/18 9:12 AM, Kyle Russell wrote:
> > Hey Mark,
> >
> > Do you think this approach is reasonable?
On 10/4/18 9:12 AM, Kyle Russell wrote:
> Hey Mark,
>
> Do you think this approach is reasonable? If so, I have another patch I'd
> like
> to propose that would enable us to better catch error scenarios (like the last
> two patches address) that we might encounter during do_image_prelink. We
Since `da5ec06 package: Add auto package splitting of .debug file'
applied in oe-core, only one dbg package is split by default,
set NOAUTOPACKAGEDEBUG = '1' to support multiple dbg packages
Use `=+' to replace `+=', it will split user define sub package first
Add missing dirs to FILES_${PN}-dbg
Since `da5ec06 package: Add auto package splitting of .debug file'
applied in oe-core, only one dbg package is split by default,
set NOAUTOPACKAGEDEBUG = '1' to support multiple dbg packages
Correct dirs for FILES_${PN}-extra/FILES_${PN}-extra-dbg/
FILES_${PN}-dbg, previously dirs are obsolete.
12 matches
Mail list logo
