Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3)

2019-04-03 Thread Yeoh, Ee Peng
Hi Richard, Sorry for the confusion. Yes, public autobuilder had already covered all automated runtime qemu tests. We do not plan to run any automated runtime qemu tests. For automated selftest, we plan to run a subset of selftest tests for a list of qemu architecture (qemu-shutdown &

[yocto] wic / wks partition

2019-04-03 Thread Johann Obermayr
Hello, we need to add a raw partition Type=0xda . How can I do that, because "part -fstype " has no raw or other value. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Johann Obermayr -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] Proposed new QA process

2019-04-03 Thread Yeoh, Ee Peng
Hi Richard, Agreed to you inputs! I had created a new QA process wiki page to compile all inputs. https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/New_QA_process > Do we need to add something to the results to indicate which results are from > "who"? (i.e. from > the public autobuilder, Intel QA, WR QA,

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3)

2019-04-03 Thread Jain, Sangeeta
Hi Richard, >-Original Message- >From: richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org >Sent: Wednesday, 3 April, 2019 5:20 PM >To: Jain, Sangeeta ; Poky Build User >; yocto@yoctoproject.org; >sjolley.yp...@gmail.com; Yi Zhao >Cc: ota...@ossystems.com.br; Chan, Aaron Chun Yew >;

[yocto] grub-efi

2019-04-03 Thread Johann Obermayr
Hello, now i build a wic image. This has bootia32.efi included. How can I add bootx64.efi & legacy bios boot ? Because the image must boot on different x64 machines. One machine has only efi 64 bit boot support. Another (older) has only legacy boot support. After create a image I have copy

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

2019-04-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 4:07 PM Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Thursday, 4 April 2019 5:46:04 AM NZDT Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:41 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 20:46, Tom Rini wrote: > >

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

2019-04-03 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday, 4 April 2019 5:46:04 AM NZDT Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:41 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 20:46, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > The kernel does not have "upgrade foo to the latest

Re: [yocto] gdb built with musl libc segfault

2019-04-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:59 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:51 AM Lluis Campos > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > This is my very first question in the Yocto mailing list. Very exited! > > Please let me know if I should use other list for this. > > > > > > I am building an image

Re: [yocto] gdb built with musl libc segfault

2019-04-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:51 AM Lluis Campos wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is my very first question in the Yocto mailing list. Very exited! > Please let me know if I should use other list for this. > > > I am building an image using musl libc instead of gnu libc. I am not > using yocto-tiny distro,

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

2019-04-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:41 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 20:46, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > The kernel does not have "upgrade foo to the latest upstream version" > > > > commits. > > > > > > > > With the Automatic

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

2019-04-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 20:46, Tom Rini wrote: > > > The kernel does not have "upgrade foo to the latest upstream version" > > > commits. > > > > > > With the Automatic Upgrade Helper this is a semi-automatic task, and > > > most of

Re: [yocto] gdb built with musl libc segfault

2019-04-03 Thread Paul Barker
On 02/04/2019 14:51, Lluis Campos wrote: Hi Paul, On 02.04.2019 14:49, Paul Barker wrote: On 02/04/2019 12:45, Lluis Campos wrote: Hi all, This is my very first question in the Yocto mailing list. Very exited! Please let me know if I should use other list for this. I am building an

[linux-yocto] [kernel-meta v4.19 PATCH] mips: Enable the poweroff driver for the qemumips/qemumips64

2019-04-03 Thread Kevin Hao
As Indicated by Richard Purdie, in order to shutdown the machine we have to explicitly enable the PIIX4 poweroff driver for the qemumips/qemumips64 after the kernel commit dd129c6374e9 ("MIPS: Malta: Use PIIX4 poweroff driver to power down") is merged. Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao ---

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [oe] Git commit process question.

2019-04-03 Thread akuster808
On 4/3/19 3:38 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Just to make clear, the AUH workflow does require the maintainer to > sign off and edit a commit message via 'git commit -s --reset-author > --amend' for every commit, Not sure if this a requirement anymore. Most of my packages got updated by other

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [oe] Git commit process question.

2019-04-03 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Just to make clear, the AUH workflow does require the maintainer to sign off and edit a commit message via 'git commit -s --reset-author --amend' for every commit, so AUH does not get in the way of useful commit messages. Alex On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 12:31, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Apr

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

2019-04-03 Thread Burton, Ross
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 20:46, Tom Rini wrote: > > The kernel does not have "upgrade foo to the latest upstream version" > > commits. > > > > With the Automatic Upgrade Helper this is a semi-automatic task, and > > most of the time there is no specific motivation other than upgrading > > to the

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] samhain: hash fix for aarch64 and mips64

2019-04-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 04:55:14PM +0800, mingli...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Mingli Yu > > samhain fails on both aarch64 and mips64 targets with: > | samhain[3013]: FATAL: x_dnmalloc.c: 2790: hashval < AMOUNTHASH > > Though there is already a patch

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3)

2019-04-03 Thread Yeoh, Ee Peng
Hi Armin, For 2.6.2.rc3, QA team shall try to run the execution by referring to the manual testcases from master. Thanks, Yeoh Ee Peng -Original Message- From: akuster808 [mailto:akuster...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 5:50 PM To: Jain, Sangeeta ; Poky Build User ;

[yocto] shared cmake modules

2019-04-03 Thread Gabriele Zampieri
Hi all, I'm setting up a layer that will compile our applications and libraries. All the applications are based on cmake and they share modules. Before using yocto I kept the modules in /cmake (under version control) alongside applications and libraries. With yocto I wrote a recipe that checkout

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] samhain: hash fix for aarch64 and mips64

2019-04-03 Thread akuster808
On 4/3/19 1:55 AM, mingli...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Mingli Yu > > samhain fails on both aarch64 and mips64 targets with: > | samhain[3013]: FATAL: x_dnmalloc.c: 2790: hashval < AMOUNTHASH > > Though there is already a patch samhain-mips64-aarch64-dnmalloc-hash-fix.patch > to fix this

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3)

2019-04-03 Thread akuster808
Hello, On 4/3/19 1:06 AM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Intel and WR YP QA is now working on QA execution for YP build 2.6.2 RC3. We > are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: > > OEQA-Manual tests for following modules: > 1.SDK > 2.Eclipse-plugin > 3.Kernel > 4.Toaster

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

2019-04-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:46:14PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:51:21AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 04:20:41PM -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700,

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3)

2019-04-03 Thread richard . purdie
Hi, This is good information and helps a lot, thanks! I had a question below. On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 08:06 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Intel and WR YP QA is now working on QA execution for YP build 2.6.2 > RC3. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: > > OEQA-Manual tests

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] samhain: hash fix for aarch64 and mips64

2019-04-03 Thread mingli.yu
From: Mingli Yu samhain fails on both aarch64 and mips64 targets with: | samhain[3013]: FATAL: x_dnmalloc.c: 2790: hashval < AMOUNTHASH Though there is already a patch samhain-mips64-aarch64-dnmalloc-hash-fix.patch to fix this issue, the logic is incomplete and pass -DCONFIG_ARCH_MIPS64=1 and

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3)

2019-04-03 Thread Jain, Sangeeta
Intel and WR YP QA is now working on QA execution for YP build 2.6.2 RC3. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: OEQA-Manual tests for following modules: 1. SDK 2. Eclipse-plugin 3. Kernel 4. Toaster 5. Bitbake (oe-core) 6. Build-appliance 7.

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.7 M3 RC1

2019-04-03 Thread Jain, Sangeeta
Hi Richard, For oe-selftest -r runqemu,meta_ide, configuration we are using is only changing the machine type. For adding "who" identifier in resulttool command, we can take it up as an enhancement. Thanks & Regards, Sangeeta Jain >-Original Message- >From: