Re: [yocto] problem adding a user

t;>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Help me to understand this. the back-quotes are the right ones. If you >>>>> use the single ones your password in the /etc/shadow ends up being >>>>> 'openssl >>>>> passwd test' (without

Re: [yocto] /usr/bin/env requires coreutils?

Hi Emily, On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:50 AM Emily S wrote: > > Ahh okay you meant just literally if there was anything else in it. An > additional complication of my setup is that our custom board is in Europe, so > right now there's no one to load the OS for me and boot, but I will check as >

Re: [yocto] /usr/bin/env requires coreutils?

Hi Emily, On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:53 PM Emily S wrote: > > When you ask if there is anything in /usr/bin at all I'm not sure what you > mean, could you elaborate? > On the root filesystem, do you see other executables in the /usr/bin/ directory? > Ahh so you're saying something in the

Re: [yocto] /usr/bin/env requires coreutils?

Hi Emily, I guess the problem is more in your init-clock recipe, and I am assuming this one: https://github.com/kratsg/meta-l1calo/blob/master/recipes-core/init/init-clock_1.0.0.bb This probably was always incorrect, but the problem now shows with newer Yocto releases. Regards, Leon --

Re: [yocto] /usr/bin/env requires coreutils?

Hi Emily, On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:58 PM Emily S wrote: > > The full error is below, but essentially: > nothing provides /usr/bin/env needed by init-clock-1.0.0-r0.aarch64 > Do you have anything in /usr/bin at all? i.e. https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-November/003467.html

Re: [yocto] /usr/bin/env requires coreutils?

Hi Emily, On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:45 PM Emily S wrote: > > It seems like now you need to depend on coreutils to get /usr/bin/env > working, why is that? Coreutils is a bit big and takes awhile to compile. > This wasn't the previous behavior, and I'm wondering why it was changed. > What issue

Re: [yocto] Resizing extended partition in image created with wic (poky sumo)

following command I get an error > > > > parted /dev/… resizepart 4 -1s > > bash[177]: Expand extended partition(4)... Error: Unable to satisfy all > constraints on the partition. > > > > I have searched the internet but can’t seem to find any suggestions about > w

Re: [yocto] any rumblings about a newer YP powerpc reference board than mpc8315e-rdb?

Hi, I didn't check availability, but p2020rdb is it's successor (and similar, 2010). Regards, Leon > On 3 Mar 2017, at 14:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Burton, Ross wrote: >> >> On 3 March 2017 at 13:24, Robert P. J. Day

Re: [yocto] is there a list somewhere of OE/YP-supported system perf/monitoring tools?

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2017-02-08 07:48, Maciej Borzęcki wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Robert P. J. Day >> wrote: >> >>> >>> colleague asked me for a list of OE/YP recipes for monitoring system >>>

Re: [yocto] Where to find help for yocto application and and system development

Hi Jakob, welcome on-board. The Yocto community expects you to re-use the available documentation and online resources (or even offline resources like books) on Yocto or OpenEmbedded. Then if things remains unclear you can ask questions here on the mailing list and on IRC channels yocto. Your

Re: [yocto] Changing over to systemd (no dhcp)

Hi Colin, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:59 PM, wrote: > > DISTRO_FEATURES_remove = " sysvinit" > > I suspect there’s also some de-cluttering needed e.g. init.d scripts still > being installed as well as a .service. > I wouldn't expect these to be installed. Which

Re: [yocto] Changing over to systemd (no dhcp)

Hello Mike, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > An no one (except one of the systemd folks) has come up with a program > that just waits for the the processes to finish (with a timeout) and only > uses the "-9" double barrel shotgun to finish only

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/7] introduce rockchip offical linux support to meta-rockchip

Hi Jacob, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Jacob Chen wrote: > This series of patches add below features, will add more supports in the > future(medias, more chips). > 1 > Rockchip 4.4 kernel is currently the latest version of the rockchip > offical kernel, will be an

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 0/2] Drop kernel versions 4.7 and 4.8

Andrei, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Andrei Gherzan <and...@gherzan.ro> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 05:24:05PM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Andrei Gherzan <and...@gherzan.ro> > wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 0/2] Drop kernel versions 4.7 and 4.8

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > Based we should only keep 4.4 and 4.10 (or 4.9). > > Ane comments before I proceed? :) > > I think keeping 4.9 (Long Term Support kernel) for sure. Regards, Leon. -- ___

Re: [yocto] Illegal Instruction Generate for Intel Atom

+Khem On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 16 January 2017 at 14:47, Chris Trobridge > wrote: > >> Managed to get the actual compiler lines and the initial args are "-m32 >> -march=i586" but there is "-march=native"

Re: [yocto] Illegal Instruction Generate for Intel Atom

Hi Chris, there is a hint here how you can find out what gcc is actually using; you could try with and without the -march=native: http://en.chys.info/2010/04/what-exactly-marchnative-means/ On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Chris Trobridge wrote: > the initial args

Re: [yocto] Illegal Instruction Generate for Intel Atom

Hello Chris, Probably unrelated, but yesterday my krogoth build failed on an Atom *host/build* system. I was just about to debug this when I saw your email. The configure stage of gmp-native decided to choose -march=k8 and -mtune=k8 -m64. I am debugging this currently. Maybe check if the

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] meta-freescale general mailing list

Hello Otavio, all, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.brwrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.brwrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Philip Balister phi...@balister.orgwrote: On 11/14/2012 11:58 AM, McClintock

Re: [yocto] [for denzil] kernel.bbclass: Copy bounds.h only if it exists, needed for 2.6.x.

Hello Koen, On 08/01/2012 08:55 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Shouldn't this be sent to the oe-core list?!?!? It was intended for the denzil branch ([for denzil]) of Yocto, that's why I sent it to yocto@yoctoproject.org. If that was wrong reasoning, let me know, I would be glad to change workflow if I

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: Iff exists, copy bounds.h for external module building.

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Leon Woestenberg sidebranch.openembed...@gmail.com wrote: On 12-07-30 11:07 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-07-28 09:45 AM, Leon Woestenberg wrote: From: Leon Woestenbergl...@sidebranch.com Aha. And now I see that Scott G was copied. If this was for 1.2.x

[yocto] [denzil-next BREAKAGE] Silent breakage in denzil-next --- uImage*.dts no longer generated

Hello Scott, I tested your denzil-next branch but found breakage that will not fail the (auto) build. poky-contrib.git$ git branch master * sgarman/denzil-next poky-contrib.git$ git log -n1 commit 6a7d4c7dfc574669ea2eeacede1b74e2f55c4675 I'm hitting the Warning: ${DTS_FILE} is not available!

Re: [yocto] [denzil-next BREAKAGE] Silent breakage in denzil-next --- uImage*.dts no longer generated

Hello Scott, all, On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Leon Woestenberg sidebranch.openembed...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Scott, I tested your denzil-next branch but found breakage that will not fail the (auto) build. I'm hitting the Warning: ${DTS_FILE} is not available! case. Disregard

[yocto] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: Iff exists, copy bounds.h for external module building.

From: Leon Woestenberg l...@sidebranch.com Signed-off-by: Leon Woestenberg l...@sidebranch.com --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass index c21ab96..bd3e335 100644

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: Iff exists, copy bounds.h for external module building.

Hello Bruce, Scott, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 12-07-30 11:07 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-07-28 09:45 AM, Leon Woestenberg wrote: From: Leon Woestenbergleon@sidebranch.**com l...@sidebranch.com Aha. And now I see that Scott

Re: [yocto] Usb-serial device support

Giovanni, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Giovanni Foiani fno...@unife.it wrote: I built a distribution for iMX53 QSB with kernel 2.6.35-3 and I need support for USB-serial devices. When I plug the usb-serial converter I get this error.. *usb wakeup is here *

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/3] distro: Add poky-tiny distro definition

Darren, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.comwrote: Poky-tiny is intended for building very small OS images. The distro definition sets the providers for the kernel and the runtime services. It also reduces the eglibc component list and other DISTRO_FEATURE

Re: [yocto] [PATCH V3 0/3] New distribution definition for poky-tiny

Hello Darren, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.comwrote: V3: o Rebase on master o Dependent on oe-core series Fixes for tiny distros and linux-yocto-tiny RFC V2: o Use VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_keymaps as suggested by Martin Jansa o Drop poky-common

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta-bsp-kirkwood: created layer for Marvellkirkwood

Hello, On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: In message: [yocto] [PATCH] meta-bsp-kirkwood: created layer for Marvellkirkwood on 28/11/2010 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: This layer is a first attempt to create a layer for kirkwoord. On this topic.

Re: [yocto] Eclipse plug-in does not detect my target

Hello Jessica, On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Leon Woestenberg leon.woestenb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Zhang, Jessica jessica.zh...@intel.com wrote: Leon Woestenberg wrote: built, I wanted to test the Eclipse plug-in. After selecting Poky Tree mode in the Yocto

Re: [yocto] Eclipse plug-in does not detect my target

Hello Jessica, On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Zhang, Jessica jessica.zh...@intel.com wrote: Leon Woestenberg wrote: built, I wanted to test the Eclipse plug-in. After selecting Poky Tree mode in the Yocto Tool configuration, I could not make it detect the target; the drop down box remained

[yocto] Eclipse plug-in does not detect my target

Hello Yoctonians, I created a custom layer with the PowerPC e500v2 architecture and machine, host tripplet powerpc-linux-gnuspe. After building a target package, pciutils, so that the tools were built, I wanted to test the Eclipse plug-in. After selecting Poky Tree mode in the Yocto Tool