[yocto] Zeus Call for patches

Hello, We are planning on doing the first dot release for Zeus this coming Monday. If you would like a get your changes into this Zeus update, please have them on the list by this Friday for review. regards, Armin & Anuj -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW46'19

Hello Stephen, On 11/12/19 7:47 AM, sjolley.yp...@gmail.com wrote: > > Current Dev Position: YP 3.1 M1  > > Next Deadline: YP 3.1 M1 build Dec. 2, 2019 > >   > > SWAT Team Rotation: > > * SWAT lead is currently: Anuj  > * SWAT team rotation: Anuj -> Chen on Nov. 15, 2019 > * SWAT team

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.7.2.rc1)

On 11/13/19 6:09 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Hello All, > > Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-2.7.2.rc1. > We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: > > OEQA-manual tests for following module: > 1. OE-Core > 2. BSP-hw > 3. BSP-Qemu > > Runtime

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW44’19

On 10/29/19 5:12 PM, Stephen K Jolley wrote: > > Current Dev Position: YP 3.1 M1  > > Next Deadline: YP 3.1 M1 build Dec. 2, 2019 > I noticed there is no 3.0.1 schedule.  Can we try for early December? > > SWAT Team Rotation: > > * > > SWAT lead is currently: Amanda > > * > > SWAT

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.4.rc2)

Jain, Thanks for the report. On 10/23/19 1:00 AM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Hello all, > > This is the full report for 2.6.4 RC2: > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults > > === Summary > No high milestone defects. >

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper] Replaced hardcoded BASE_HOMEDIR directory

On 10/18/19 9:55 AM, Marco wrote: > Replaced hardcoded BASE_HOMEDIR directory. > Please apologize the missing send-email on my machine. Thanks Marco, Would the be any need to add something to the README regarding the use of this variable? - armin > -- > Marco > --

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.4.rc2)

On 10/17/19 7:01 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org On >> Behalf Of akuster >> Sent: Friday, 18 October, 2019 6:53 AM >> To: yocto@yoctoproject.org >> Cc: akuster...@gmail.com; Chan, Aaron Chun Yew >> ; ota...@ossystems.com.br >>

Re: [yocto] [thud][PATCH] linux-yocto/4.14: meta-yocto-bsp update to 143

This appears to have been missed for this round. maybe next time - armin On 10/9/19 8:09 AM, Armin Kuster wrote: > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster > --- > .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.14.bbappend | 20 > ++-- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] apparmor: add PRIVATE_LIBS for ptest package

merged On 10/10/19 4:22 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Otherwise, the following occurs: > ERROR: apparmor-2.13.3-r0 do_package: apparmor: Multiple shlib providers for > libapparmor.so.1: apparmor, apparmor-ptest (used by files: >

Re: [yocto] [warrior 0/3] Pull request

ping On 10/6/19 8:40 AM, Armin Kuster wrote: > Please merge these changes to meta-yocto warrior > > The following changes since commit c16082ffa61f485e120670fbdf075f3fa8597494: > > poky.conf: Bump version for 2.7.1 warrior release (2019-06-30 22:41:39 > +0100) > > are available in the git

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] layer.conf: Update for zeus series

On 10/11/19 12:51 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Acked-by: Martin Jansa > > > Please merge this to unblock CI. done > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:55 AM Armin Kuster > wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster

[yocto] Patchwork and stable branches

My apologies for cross posting. I have noticed some behavior I was not expecting with OE's Patchwork in that it is hiding patches.  I don't know if this is by design or a bug in our Patchwork. When a series of patches are submitted to the mailing list and are same fix but against different

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] 3.0 release notes / migration guide

Paul, On 10/2/19 3:20 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi folks > > So it's that time again - we need to start building up the raw material for > the release notes and migration guide for the upcoming 3.0 release, and I'd > like to request some help with some parts of it - read on for details. > >

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.8 M3 RC1

On 9/25/19 11:33 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > >   > > Hello All, > >   > > This is the full QA report for 2.8 M3 RC1:  > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults > >   > > === Summary > > No high milestone defects.  > >

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] ncrack: update to tip

On 9/15/19 7:18 AM, Scott Ellis wrote: > Signed-off-by: Scott Ellis > --- > recipes-security/ncrack/ncrack_0.7.bb | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes-security/ncrack/ncrack_0.7.bb > b/recipes-security/ncrack/ncrack_0.7.bb > index

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux] [PATCH] python-scapy: upgrade 2.4.2 -> 2.4.3

On 8/29/19 7:25 AM, Joe MacDonald wrote: > [Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux] [PATCH] python-scapy: upgrade 2.4.2 -> 2.4.3] On > 19.08.29 (Thu 07:14) akuster808 wrote: > No v2 required. does not affect patchwork. - armin >> >> On 8/28/19 10:41 PM, Yuan Chao wrote: >>&

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux] [PATCH] python-scapy: upgrade 2.4.2 -> 2.4.3

On 8/28/19 10:41 PM, Yuan Chao wrote: > License file changed from bin/scapy to LICENSE Is this the correct layer? -armin > > Signed-off-by: Yuan Chao > --- > recipes-security/scapy/python-scapy.inc | 4 ++-- > .../scapy/{python-scapy_2.4.2.bb => python-scapy_2.4.3.bb}

Re: [yocto] Build break in the latest openbmc tree.

the meta-security layer should be fix now. please update and let me know if not. -armin On 8/22/19 6:09 PM, Brad Bishop wrote: > at 6:38 PM, James Feist wrote: > >> On 8/22/19 3:35 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote: >>> Hi brad, >> >> + The mailing list >> >>> We met a build break while making Intel

Re: [yocto] Build break in the latest openbmc tree.

On 8/22/19 6:09 PM, Brad Bishop wrote: > at 6:38 PM, James Feist wrote: > >> On 8/22/19 3:35 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote: >>> Hi brad, >> >> + The mailing list >> >>> We met a build break while making Intel platform builds. >>> ERROR: No recipes available for: >>>

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 3/3] linux-stable/5.2: add stable bbappend

On 8/20/19 8:11 PM, Hongzhi, Song wrote: > Hi Armin, > > Do you know where is linux-stable_5.2.bb? yes. in meta-odroid. I suspect we could just use linux-%_5.2.bb - armin > > Thanks, > > --Hongzhi > > > On 8/14/19 7:54 AM, Armin Kuster wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >> --- >>  

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][thud] meta-yocto-bsp: Bump to the latest stable kernel for the BSPs

On 8/12/19 8:48 PM, Kevin Hao wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 01:23:35PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: >> In order to fix a systemtap bug [1] on arm board, we backport a kernel >> patch from v5.0 kernel to v4.14 & v4.18 kernel, then need to bump the >> kernel version to include this patch. Even this

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/4] More security fragments

On 8/12/19 8:11 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > I've merged these to the 4.19/5.0/5.2 and master branches. thanks. -armin > > SRCREV updates will follow this week, once I get some more test cycles > completed. > > Bruce > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:29 PM Armin Kuster

Re: [yocto] [meta-integrity] layer.conf: switch to keyutils from meta-oe

On 8/6/19 6:54 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > пн, 29 июл. 2019 г. в 13:45, : >> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov >> >> As pointer by Martin Jansa, keyutils package is now a part of meta-oe, >> so switch to using keyutils from that layer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > This

Re: [yocto] [meta-security 2/3] kernel-modsign.bbclass: add support for kernel modules signing

On 8/4/19 1:24 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > вс, 4 авг. 2019 г. в 18:30, akuster808 : >> On 7/28/19 8:31 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >>> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov >>> >>> Add bbclass responsible for handling signing of kernel modules.

Re: [yocto] [meta-security 2/3] kernel-modsign.bbclass: add support for kernel modules signing

On 7/28/19 8:31 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > Add bbclass responsible for handling signing of kernel modules. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > --- > meta-integrity/classes/kernel-modsign.bbclass | 29 +++ >

Re: [yocto] [meta-integrity][PATCH] ima-evm-utils: bump to release 1.2.1

Dmitry, On 7/31/19 1:24 PM, dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > --- > ...link-to-libcrypto-instead-of-OpenSSL.patch | 65 --- > ...ls-replace-INCLUDES-with-AM_CPPFLAGS.patch | 43 >

Re: [yocto] [meta-security] keyutils: migrate to meta-oe

On 7/29/19 3:47 AM, dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > keyutils are now part of meta-oe, so remove them from meta-security. This should be sitting in master-next already - armin > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > --- >

Re: [yocto] [meta-security-compliance][PATCH 2/4] openscap: add 1.3.1 recipes for upstream source

> On Jul 23, 2019, at 02:51, Yi Zhao wrote: > > Hi Armin, > > > I got the following error when build openscap: > > ERROR: openscap-git-r0 do_compile_ptest_base: Function failed: > do_compile_ptest_base (log file is located at >

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] RFC: dropping official support for Debian 8 / Opensuse 42.3

On 7/17/19 1:37 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi, > > Now that both Debian 8 and OpenSuse 42.3 are end-of-life and no longer > formally supported, we think it's time to drop them from the supported > distribution list. Initially this involves removing them from the > SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS list in

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.7.1.rc1)

On 7/5/19 12:04 AM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > QA cycle report for 2.7.1 RC1: > >   > > 1. No high milestone defects.  > 2. Test results are available at following location: > >   • For results of all automated tests, > please refer to results at public AB [1] > >    

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.7.1.rc1)

On 7/1/19 10:26 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > Hello All, > >   > > Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build 2.7.rc1 > > We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: > I would like to thank Intel and Wind River for doing QA. >   > > OEQA-manual tests for

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW26'19

On 6/25/19 10:22 AM, sjolley.yp...@gmail.com wrote: > > Current Dev Position: YP 2.8 M2 > > Next Deadline: YP 2.8 Milestone 2 Cutoff July 14th, 2019 > >   > > SWAT Team Rotation: > > * SWAT lead is currently: Ross > * SWAT team rotation: Ross -> Amanda on June 28, 2019 > * SWAT team

[yocto] update-rc.d 0.9 request

Is is possible to bump the version of update-rc.d to 0.9 ? New functionality was added after 0.8 and a simple hash makes version control harder. - Armin -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-docs] ref-manual: Corrected openSUSE essential packages

On 6/6/19 4:46 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > Some packages were bumped onto the pip3 install line. Install them with > zypper as before. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead > --- is this too early to Ping? is there an issue with this patch? -armin > documentation/poky.ent | 4 ++-- > 1

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] oe-selftest: add running cve checker

Chen, On 6/14/19 1:13 AM, ChenQi wrote: > Hi Armin, > > I just noticed this selftest case. > Have you considered putting it into oe-core? Yes I have. That was the first place I wanted to put it but Richard and Ross have reservations about doing that so it sits in meta-security until we can get it

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][master][warrior][PATCH 0/3] python-scapy:solved the conflict with python3-scapy

On 6/10/19 12:24 AM, Zang Ruochen wrote: > -Remove redundant sed operations. > > -Rename conflicting files to resolve conflicts. merged to master. working on warrior thanks, - armin > > > Zang Ruochen (3): > [yocto][meta-security][master][warrior][PATCH 1/3] python-scapy: Remove >

Re: [yocto] [meta-security] AppArmor 2.11 no longer available on Ubuntu archive (sumo branch)

On 6/7/19 3:09 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > That is deliberate and by design, recipes shouldn't fetch from > Debian/Ubuntu archives for this reason. > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-security/commit/?id=462d76700a3c2748067d4685db8985c511b1b46c > is a patch to master that needs to

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-docs] ref-manual: Corrected openSUSE essential packages

On 6/7/19 4:19 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM akuster808 <mailto:akuster...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 6/6/19 4:46 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > > Some packages were bumped onto the pip3 install line. Inst

Re: [yocto] [meta-security] AppArmor 2.11 no longer available on Ubuntu archive (sumo branch)

On 6/7/19 3:09 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > That is deliberate and by design, recipes shouldn't fetch from > Debian/Ubuntu archives for this reason. > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-security/commit/?id=462d76700a3c2748067d4685db8985c511b1b46c > is a patch to master that needs to

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-docs] ref-manual: Corrected openSUSE essential packages

On 6/6/19 4:46 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > Some packages were bumped onto the pip3 install line. Install them with > zypper as before. with backport? ie is Warrior or Thud affected, I suspect so - armin > > Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead > --- > documentation/poky.ent | 4 ++-- > 1 file

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] samhain: add rconflict for client and server mode

On 5/27/19 7:37 PM, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > Signed-off-by: Changqing Li merged.  thanks, Armin > --- > recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-client_4.3.2.bb | 1 + > recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-server_4.3.2.bb | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] python3-fail2ban: Fix build error of xrange.

On 5/20/19 11:57 PM, Lei, Maohui wrote: > ping Merged thanks. >> -Original Message- >> From: Lei, Maohui >> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 11:59 AM >> To: yocto@yoctoproject.org >> Cc: Lei, Maohui >> Subject: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] python3-fail2ban: Fix build error of >>

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW21'19

On 5/21/19 7:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Current Dev Position: YP 2.8 M1 > > Next Deadline: YP 2.8 Milestone 1 Cutoff June 9th, 2019 > > > SWAT Team Rotation: > > * > > SWAT lead is currently: Ross > > * > > SWAT team rotation: Ross -> Chen on May. 24, 2019 > > * > > SWAT

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] keyutils: fix library install path

On 5/17/19 1:20 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > When you're on it, can you please check if it works with multilib? > > I think $(USRLIBDIR) doesn't respect ${libdir} from OE, so it always > installs the library to /usr/lib instead of e.g. /usr/lib64 with > multlilib. Thank, Will do. - armin > >

Re: [yocto] patchwork

ok, so no Admins. This is unexceptionable. OE TSC and Board, I believe its your time to get involved. regards, Armin On 5/3/19 10:18 AM, akuster808 wrote: > Hello OE folk, > > My apologies for cross posting. > > Who is the Admin for Patchwork? > > I would like additional

Re: [yocto] [yocto-infrastructure] Upcoming network outage: Fri, May 17 starting 10PM PDT (Sat, 5:00Z)

On 5/10/19 4:21 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > What: 30-minute network outage to Portland-hosted services > When: Fri, May 17, between 10PM-3AM PDT (Sat, 05:00-10:00 UTC) > Why : Network equipment replacement by our service provider > > Services Impacted:  autobuilder.yoctoproject.org >

Re: [yocto] SDK build fails at latest thud

Teemu, On 5/1/19 11:50 PM, Teemu K wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:36 AM Teemu K wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 7:21 AM Teemu K wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:17 AM akuster wrote: On 3/13/19 9:50 PM, Teemu K wrote: Hi, I noticed that when trying

[yocto] patchwork

Hello OE folk, My apologies for cross posting. Who is the Admin for Patchwork? I would like additional privileges to manage the "Yocto Project Layers" queue. Also, I would like additional  privileges to add new branches for any oe, meta-oe queues & yp layers. kind regards, Armin --

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] QA cycle report for 2.7 RC2

Sangeeta, On 4/25/19 11:27 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > >   > > QA cycle reportfor 2.7 RC2: > >   > > 1. No high milestone defects.  > 2. Test results are available at following location: > > ·    For results of all automated tests, please refer to results > at public AB [1]. > > ·   

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] QA cycle report for 2.5.3 RC3

On 4/23/19 7:35 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 04:58 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: >> >> QA cycle report for 2.5.3 RC3: >> >> No high milestone defects. >> Test results are available at following location: >> ·For results of all automated tests,

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Eclipse support dropped with immediate effect

On 4/10/19 3:11 PM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 05:56 +0530, akuster808 wrote: >> On 4/9/19 8:52 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> I'm sorry to have to say this but the project is terminating its >>> official eclipse plugin su

Re: [yocto] [sumo] [PATCH v1] systemd: fix musl compilation

On 4/9/19 8:44 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 4/9/2019 7:49 AM, akuster wrote: >> After closer look, I don't the "Upstream-Status:" nor a signoff in the >> patch being added in the bb file. >> >> Does this issue affect later branches ? > > I can fix this. The issue was introduced while backporting

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Eclipse support dropped with immediate effect

On 4/9/19 8:52 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > I'm sorry to have to say this but the project is terminating its > official eclipse plugin support with immediate effect. Does this affect the stable branches as well? - armin > > There is nobody willing to keep the builds going, fix bugs, port to

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH] poky-tiny: set 5.0 as the preferred kernel

On 4/9/19 9:09 PM, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Bruce Ashfield > > Updating poky-tiny to prefer 5.0 as the kernel version. Boot > tested against qemux86 and qemuarm. This removes the last user > of the 4.18 kernel, so we can queue it for removal from master. Thanks Bruce. - Armin >

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] clamav: freshclam need bind to run

On 4/7/19 12:46 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 11:45:18AM +0530, akuster808 wrote: >> >> On 4/7/19 10:42 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:38:38AM +0530, akuster808 wrote: >>>> On 4/6/19 8:31 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] clamav: freshclam need bind to run

On 4/7/19 10:42 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:38:38AM +0530, akuster808 wrote: >> >> On 4/6/19 8:31 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 08:15:40PM +0530, Armin Kuster wrote: >>>> Add it to the rdepends for that package &

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] clamav: freshclam need bind to run

On 4/6/19 8:31 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 08:15:40PM +0530, Armin Kuster wrote: >> Add it to the rdepends for that package >> >> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >> --- >> recipes-security/clamav/clamav_0.99.4.bb | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] clamav: freshclam need bind to run

sent the wrong version. v2 later Ill deal with it tomorrow after some much need sleep -armin On 4/6/19 8:15 PM, Armin Kuster wrote: > Add it to the rdepends for that package > > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster > --- > recipes-security/clamav/clamav_0.99.4.bb | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] sssd: add DISTRO_FEATURE sssd

On 4/6/19 12:06 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 05:54:35AM +0530, akuster808 wrote: >> >> On 4/5/19 1:49 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 11:05:17AM +0530, akuster808 wrote: >>>> On 4/5/19 10:29 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] sssd: add DISTRO_FEATURE sssd

On 4/5/19 1:49 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 11:05:17AM +0530, akuster808 wrote: >> >> On 4/5/19 10:29 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 03:47:46AM +0530, Armin Kuster wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >>>>

Re: [yocto] Worries kernels supported

On 4/6/19 5:12 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM akuster808 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I noticed there are 3 kernels in Warrior. 4.18, 4.19 an 5.0. Do we >> really need 4.18? >> I see its the default version for poky-tiny. 4.18 is EOL but m

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] sssd: add DISTRO_FEATURE sssd

On 4/5/19 10:29 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 03:47:46AM +0530, Armin Kuster wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >> --- >> recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.4.bb | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.4.bb

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3)

On 4/5/19 3:25 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 02:19 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: >> Also, I don't see any ptest results for 2.6.2.rc3 on public >> autobuilder. Do you have any plans to run them and share the results >> on autobuilder? > These were run

[yocto] Worries kernels supported

Hello, I noticed there are 3 kernels in Warrior. 4.18, 4.19 an 5.0. Do we really need 4.18? I see its the default version for poky-tiny. 4.18 is EOL but maintained by Windriver. regards, Armin -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [oe] Git commit process question.

On 4/3/19 3:38 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Just to make clear, the AUH workflow does require the maintainer to > sign off and edit a commit message via 'git commit -s --reset-author > --amend' for every commit, Not sure if this a requirement anymore. Most of my packages got updated by other

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] samhain: hash fix for aarch64 and mips64

On 4/3/19 1:55 AM, mingli...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Mingli Yu > > samhain fails on both aarch64 and mips64 targets with: > | samhain[3013]: FATAL: x_dnmalloc.c: 2790: hashval < AMOUNTHASH > > Though there is already a patch samhain-mips64-aarch64-dnmalloc-hash-fix.patch > to fix this

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3)

Hello, On 4/3/19 1:06 AM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Intel and WR YP QA is now working on QA execution for YP build 2.6.2 RC3. We > are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: > > OEQA-Manual tests for following modules: > 1.SDK > 2.Eclipse-plugin > 3.Kernel > 4.Toaster

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On 4/2/19 12:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:45:16AM +, Jon Mason wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:41 AM Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 4/1/19 6:20 PM, akuster808 wrote: >>>> >>>> On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>&

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On 4/2/19 12:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:51:21AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 04:20:41PM -0700, akuster808 wrote: >>> >>> On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akust

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have noticed a large number of git commits with no header >> information being accepted. > Can you be more specific about what "no header inform

[yocto] Git commit process question.

Hello, I have noticed a large number of git commits with no header information being accepted. Are we still following: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines regards, Armin -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 3/4] linux-yocto: make bbappend version neutral

On 3/31/19 10:59 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 10:28:59AM -0700, Armin Kuster wrote: >> update apparmor configs >> >> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >> --- >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/apparmor.cfg| 12 +++- >> .../linux/linux-yocto/apparmor_on_boot.cfg

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 4/4] linux-stable: add support for stable kernel bbappends

not goint to work. dropping On 3/31/19 10:29 AM, Armin Kuster wrote: > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster > --- > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-stable/apparmor.cfg| 15 +++ > .../linux/linux-stable/apparmor_on_boot.cfg | 1 + > .../linux/linux-stable/smack-default-lsm.cfg |

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] sssd: fix libcrypto version used

On 3/27/19 12:16 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:52:39PM -0700, akuster808 wrote: >> >> On 3/26/19 3:24 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 09:58:55AM -0700, Armin Kuster wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >>>

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] sssd: fix libcrypto version used

On 3/26/19 3:24 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 09:58:55AM -0700, Armin Kuster wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >> --- >> recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.3.bb | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.3.bb

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] OE Summit report from SCaLE17x

Trevor, Thank you for leading this effort. Its much appreciated. On 3/15/19 7:27 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hi, > > Earlier this week I got back from SCaLE17x during which I taught an E-ALE > class on Buildroot, was a TA for the other E-ALE classes, organized and ran > the first ever

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] netfilter: Enable CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_LOG

On 2/15/19 5:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:46:13AM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> merged. >> >> SRCREV updates will be sent out with my next queue. > Thanks. What's the backport policy here? I first ran into this issue > back on Jethro (but that's a fair bit too far to

Re: [yocto] YPTM minutes

On 2/5/19 10:24 AM, Joshua Watt wrote: > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 10:11 -0800, Scott Rifenbark wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 8:37 AM > > wrote: >>> >>> *Yocto Technical Team Minutes for Feb. 5, 2019.* >>> >>>   >>> >>> Attendees: Armin, David, Joshua, Randy,

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][thud][PATCH] tpm2-abrmd: Fix QA error

On 12/12/18 7:27 AM, Daniel Dragomir wrote: > QA Issue: tpm2-abrmd: Files/directories were installed but not > shipped in any package: > /usr/share/dbus-1 > /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services > /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/com.intel.tss2.Tabrmd.service merged > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [yocto] Using ICECC to build Thud issue

On 12/5/18 1:21 PM, Joshua Watt wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018, 3:09 PM John Unland wrote: > > Fixed on master: > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=1da297d35411e923ca3b6accdd37074f5182f019 > >

Re: [yocto] Yocto layers missing thud branches

On 11/20/18 4:05 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 09:47 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:11:35 AM NZDT Max Krummenacher wrote: >>> Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808: >>>> Can the maintaine

Re: [yocto] [[yocto-docs][thud][PATCH] ref-system-requirements: sync with thud poky.conf

On 11/19/18 10:16 AM, Scott Rifenbark wrote: > Armin, > > See > https://yoctoproject.org/docs/2.6/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#detailed-supported-distros > and let me know if the patch is good. Looks good. Thanks, Have a good Thanksgiving. Armin > > Thanks, > Scott > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 6:15

Re: [yocto] [[yocto-docs][thud][PATCH] ref-system-requirements: sync with thud poky.conf

On 11/18/18 6:53 PM, Ang, Chin Huat wrote: > There's a minor typo where Ubuntu 16.10 is not LTS. thanks, v2 out shortly. > > > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] on > behalf of Armin Kuster [akuster...@gmail.com] >

Re: [yocto] Yocto layers missing thud branches

On 11/18/18 12:47 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:11:35 AM NZDT Max Krummenacher wrote: >> Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808: >>> Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl >>> please add a

[yocto] Yocto layers missing thud branches

Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl please add a "Thud" branch kind regards, Armin -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] How do I enabled Fortran support in Sumo?

On 11/15/18 1:31 PM, Mike Worster wrote: > I'm trying to get Fortran support (gfortran and libgfortran) enabled > in a Yocto Sumo build. > > Based on advice I got from this site: > https://jumpnowtek.com/yocto/Add-Fortran-support-to-a-Yocto-build.html > > I have enabled fortran in my local.conf

Re: [yocto] FW: final pass on release notes....and general status of readiness

Stephen, Please add "multiconfig in no longer works with COMPATIBLE_MACHINE" bug 12985 thanks, Armin On 11/14/18 2:02 PM, Scott Rifenbark wrote: > Especially true for the manuals... always go to the website for best > set of manuals. > > Scott > > On Wed, Nov 14

Re: [yocto] FW: final pass on release notes....and general status of readiness

On 11/14/18 12:47 PM, Jolley, Stephen K wrote: > > We will release YP 2.6 M4 rc1 shortly.  Please give feedback if any is > required. > Please add the note that Tip of Thud is not what is being released. This will just confuse folks trying to connect the dots. - armin >   > > Thanks, > >   >

Re: [yocto] m4-native, zedboard, "Please port gnulib fseeko.c to your platform"

Robert, On 11/13/18 12:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > been away from YP for a few months, diving back in, want to build a > core-image-minimal for my zedboard, and i will first admit that i'm > using a non-approved distro (fully-updated fedora 29): > > "WARNING: Host distribution "fedora-29"

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

On 11/12/18 8:12 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 16:26, wrote: >> My personal view is that whilst there are a number of issues present in >> rc1, we should release it, collect up fixes on the thud branch (aleady >> happening) and plan on a 2.6.1 as soon as it looks like we have

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

On 11/11/18 1:24 PM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:18 -0800, akuster808 wrote: >> On 11/11/18 2:21 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >>> On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 10:02 -0800, akuster808 wrote: >>>> On

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

On 11/11/18 2:21 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 10:02 -0800, akuster808 wrote: >> On 11/10/18 8:25 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >>> On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 09:24 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: >>>> This is

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

On 11/10/18 8:25 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 09:24 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: >> This is the full report for 2.6 M4 RC1: >> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW44_-_2018-10-30_-_Full_Test_Cycle_2.6_M4_RC1 > Thanks Sangeeta and team! > > Now we have

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

On 11/9/18 1:24 AM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > >   > > Hello All, > >   > Thank you to the Intel and Wind QA teams for performing these tasks. Will the Build appliance failure keep it from functioning ? - armin > This is the full report for 2.6 M4 RC1:  > >

Re: [yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache][v4.4][PATCH] kver: bump to v4.4.147

On 11/6/18 2:42 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2018-11-06 5:10 PM, akuster808 wrote: >> >> On 11/6/18 2:05 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:57 PM Armin Kuster  >>> wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >>>> --- >>>

Re: [yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache][v4.4][PATCH] kver: bump to v4.4.147

On 11/6/18 2:05 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:57 PM Armin Kuster wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster >> --- >> kver | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/kver b/kver >> index 7b008cd..5ccc572 100644 >> --- a/kver >> +++ b/kver >> @@ -1

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] OEDAM @ SCaLE 2019

Morning Trevor, On 11/1/18 7:27 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:56 PM Jon Mason > wrote: > > I am planning on being at SCaLE (assuming the OEDEM happens there). > > Many corporate travel budgets are tied to presenting at

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] OEDAM @ SCaLE 2019

Trevor, On 11/1/18 7:04 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hello Fellow YP/OE Enthusiasts! > > There were discussions at our recent OEDEM regarding: > - our next developers meeting > - SCaLE 2019 > - expanding/adding to the YP/OE presence at conferences (i.e. our own > miniconf?) > > Please see time

Re: [yocto] tzdata overwrites existing localtime/zoneinfo?

On 10/28/18 6:31 PM, Anders Montonen wrote: > Hi, > >> On 28 Oct 2018, at 17:27, akuster808 wrote: >> On 10/25/18 5:43 PM, Anders Montonen wrote: >>> It seems to me that the tzdata package will overwrite whatever the current >>> time zone is with its

Re: [yocto] tzdata overwrites existing localtime/zoneinfo?

On 10/25/18 5:43 PM, Anders Montonen wrote: > Hi, > > It seems to me that the tzdata package will overwrite whatever the current > time zone is with its default. This is not great if you’re upgrading the > package on an existing system. Should the creation of the file and link be > removed

  1   2   3   >