Update
Now I have core-image-minimal building and booting for all of the
supported QEMU targets in OE-Core with musl/gcc-4.9. The updates are
all available on contrib tree branch kraj/musl, try it out for your
machine/distro if you are interested in musl
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I have core-image-minimal building and booting for all of the
supported QEMU targets in OE-Core with musl/gcc-4.9. The updates are
all available on contrib tree branch kraj/musl, try it out for your
machine/distro if you
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 30 March 2014 17:48, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 30
On 2 April 2014 17:35, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I have got core-image-minimal building for arm now. All changes are
pushed to contrib tree this includes util-linux fixes too.
You've fixed util-linux in a different way to me, I added qsort_r to
musl whereas you've removed it's use
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
You've fixed util-linux in a different way to me, I added qsort_r to
musl
this won't fly in musl community.
whereas you've removed it's use from util-linux. I'm not bothered
which one we use if both work. We do now have
On 2 April 2014 18:13, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
You've fixed util-linux in a different way to me, I added qsort_r to
musl
this won't fly in musl community.
whereas you've removed it's use from util-linux.
On 30 March 2014 17:48, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 30 March 2014 05:17, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 26 March 2014 22:12,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 30 March 2014 17:48, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 30 March 2014 05:17, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at
On 30 March 2014 05:17, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 26 March 2014 22:12, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 26 March 2014 22:04, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
There were interest in other threads
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 30 March 2014 05:17, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 26 March 2014 22:12, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 26 March 2014
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 26 March 2014 22:12, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 26 March 2014 22:04, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
There were interest in other threads in having musl as an alternative
to eglibc/uclibc that we
On 26 March 2014 22:12, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 26 March 2014 22:04, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
There were interest in other threads in having musl as an alternative
to eglibc/uclibc that we already have in OE, in that direction I have
poured in my on and off work
12 matches
Mail list logo
