Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 02:02 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: I have put together upgrade to gcc 4.9.2 as well as glibc 2.21 ( upcoming ) on a contrib branch ( top 2 patches) its has not got much testing besides x86 qemu thus far.

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-03 Thread Burton, Ross
On 3 February 2015 at 05:03, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: I think this issue was there even with older version of glibc for i7 but it was flagged as a warning, glibc 2.21 now uses -Werror by default. Can you confirm that via inspecting 2.20 glibc build logs for this machine ?

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 2 February 2015 at 18:33, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I am on archlinux (the other end of spectrum). Nevertheless, I have updated the contrib tree which fixes cross-localedef-native compile time issue. So you should be good to go now. Bad news, glibc is now failing: |

[yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Khem Raj
Hi All I have put together upgrade to gcc 4.9.2 as well as glibc 2.21 ( upcoming ) on a contrib branch ( top 2 patches) its has not got much testing besides x86 qemu thus far. http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/gcc-glibc-upgrade I would like to request some help

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: cross-localdef-native: | In file included from glibc/locale/programs/locarchive.c:696:0: | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c: In function '_nl_normalize_codeset': |

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi Khem, On 2 February 2015 at 10:02, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: I have put together upgrade to gcc 4.9.2 as well as glibc 2.21 ( upcoming ) on a contrib branch ( top 2 patches) its has not got much testing besides x86 qemu thus far. I'm seeing these failures when cherry-picking

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Ross Please repull. I did not push from right machine first time. Now it should be good. Thanks for quick turnaround Thanks -Khem On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: Hi Khem, On 2 February 2015 at 10:02, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: I have put

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: On 2 February 2015 at 18:33, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I am on archlinux (the other end of spectrum). Nevertheless, I have updated the contrib tree which fixes cross-localedef-native compile time issue.

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread akuster
Khem, If I knew what testing' entailed I would through some time at this. - Armin On 02/02/2015 02:02 AM, Khem Raj wrote: Hi All I have put together upgrade to gcc 4.9.2 as well as glibc 2.21 ( upcoming ) on a contrib branch ( top 2 patches) its has not got much testing besides x86 qemu

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Khem Raj
On Feb 2, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: On 2 February 2015 at 17:40, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, you must be using a weirdly compiled gcc on your host which is defaulting to -std c99 and hence the problem. I have

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 2 February 2015 at 10:54, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: cross-localdef-native: | In file included from glibc/locale/programs/locarchive.c:696:0: | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c: In function

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Khem Raj
On Feb 2, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: On 2 February 2015 at 10:54, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Burton, Ross
Armin, On 2 February 2015 at 16:41, akuster akus...@mvista.com wrote: If I knew what testing' entailed I would through some time at this. Please build your stuff with this glibc/gcc and check it still works. Ross -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Khem Raj
On Feb 2, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: Armin, On 2 February 2015 at 16:41, akuster akus...@mvista.com mailto:akus...@mvista.com wrote: If I knew what testing' entailed I would through some time at this. Please build your stuff with this glibc/gcc and

Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade

2015-02-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 2 February 2015 at 17:40, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, you must be using a weirdly compiled gcc on your host which is defaulting to -std c99 and hence the problem. I have fix for that issue already locally. $ gcc --version gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2 This is the default gcc