Re: [yocto] [meta-freescale] tmp/work-shared and sstate

2015-02-11 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2015-02-10 11:35, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2015-02-10 11:13, Christopher Larson wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com wrote: If I run a build where the kernel package is brought in via sstate, tmp/work-shared (in particular

Re: [yocto] [meta-freescale] tmp/work-shared and sstate

2015-02-10 Thread Christopher Larson
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote: If I run a build where the kernel package is brought in via sstate, tmp/work-shared (in particular the kernel-source tree) is not populated. This will break at least these recipes:

Re: [yocto] [meta-freescale] tmp/work-shared and sstate

2015-02-10 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2015-02-10 11:13, Christopher Larson wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com wrote: If I run a build where the kernel package is brought in via sstate, tmp/work-shared (in particular the kernel-source tree) is not