Thanks very much for the information, Zoran!
And sorry I forgot to return to this issue before.
Best Regards,
Gunnar
On February 1, 2019 9:32:02 AM GMT+01:00, Zoran Stojsavljevic
wrote:
>Since no reply for socket-can strategy... I long time ago created one
>for by me and my needs.
>
>But
Since no reply for socket-can strategy... I long time ago created one
for by me and my needs.
But still... Here is something worth nothing, if anybody considers
socket-can domain!
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/meta-socketcan
Best Regards,
Zoran Stojsavljevic
___
On Thu, Jul 19,
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 14:44 +0200, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote:
> Actually, I ran into this:
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-
> extended/socketcan
:-) I mentioned that in my original response.
>
> So here, I think, can-utils recipes should be revisited,
Actually, I ran into this:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-extended/socketcan
So here, I think, can-utils recipes should be revisited, cannelloni
recipe added, and also another application recipe added as well:
https://github.com/dschanoeh/socketcand/
Best
> I'm happy to move cannelloni to a generic layer if there is wider interest.
I did not write only the stand-alone recipe for cannelloni, since I
needed the one, original one from this location:
https://github.com/mguentner/cannelloni
I also wrote one for can-utils, since one, residing in YOCTO
