Hi Marc,
Apparently, these tests were removed upstream. As we are going to
upgrade xserver-xorg package to 1.12.3, those fixes will be included
too. However, if you need the fix now, I attached the patch.
Thanks,
Laurentiu
On 07/16/2012 08:56 PM, Marc Ferland wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having
Hi,
I need to deploy a C application that I have made on a Freescale iMX53 QSB.
First I wanted to test the cross-compilation environment building the Hello
World demo but I got some issues.
I made the following steps:
- download yocto denzil
- source oe-init-build-env
- edit local.conf
Laurentiu Palcu laurentiu.pa...@linux.intel.com writes:
Hi Marc,
Apparently, these tests were removed upstream. As we are going to
upgrade xserver-xorg package to 1.12.3, those fixes will be included
too. However, if you need the fix now, I attached the patch.
Just in case someone else
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 09:22:43 Marc Ferland wrote:
Laurentiu Palcu laurentiu.pa...@linux.intel.com writes:
Apparently, these tests were removed upstream. As we are going to
upgrade xserver-xorg package to 1.12.3, those fixes will be included
too. However, if you need the fix now, I
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
These commits add emgd 1.14 driver support for linux kernel v3.4
These commits need to go in a new branch named emgd-1.14, so
that it can be merged with various bsp specific branches as needed.
Thanks,
Nitin
The following changes since commit
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Add emgd config option (DRM_EGD) and modify Makefiles for in-tree
builds.
rebased to v3.4 code
Fix build errors caused by changes to kernel interfaces introduced by
linux 3.2 such as:
error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared here (not in a function)
due to
On 12-07-16 10:22 AM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com
These commits add emgd 1.14 driver support for linux kernel v3.4
These commits need to go in a new branch named emgd-1.14, so
that it can be merged with various bsp specific branches as needed.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:31 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
b29...@freescale.com wrote:
}
- rm -rf ${SSTATE_BUILDDIR}
+ strace rm -rf ${SSTATE_BUILDDIR}
strace is probably eating the return value
And you would
Hi Giovanni,
Can you following the ADT manual and use the built 1.2.1 toolchain tar ball?
The meta-ide-support is supposed to be used under build tree instead of copied
over to /opt/poky.
Cheers,
Jessica
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Hi there,
I'm working on building some embedded (arm) Qt 4.8.0 applications, and
would like
to strip out a lot of unused functionality. I have a set of config flags that
I've used in the past when configuring Qt outside of the Yocto workflow. As
you'll see below, I'm basically just looking for
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 10:46:56 Jon Szymaniak wrote:
QT_CONFIG_FLAGS := -release -no-rpath -reduce-relocations -shared\
-no-mmx -no-3dnow -no-sse -no-sse2 -no-sse3 -no-sse4.1 -no-sse4.2 -no-avx\
-no-glib -no-largefile -no-accessibility -no-openssl -no-gtkstyle
-no-exceptions\
-no-xcursor
QT_CONFIG_FLAGS := -release -no-rpath -reduce-relocations -shared\
-no-mmx -no-3dnow -no-sse -no-sse2 -no-sse3 -no-sse4.1 -no-sse4.2 -no-avx\
-no-glib -no-largefile -no-accessibility -no-openssl -no-gtkstyle
-no-exceptions\
-no-xcursor -no-xinerama -no-phonon -no-phonon-backend -no-svg
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Matthew McClintock m...@freescale.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:31 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
b29...@freescale.com wrote:
}
- rm -rf ${SSTATE_BUILDDIR}
+ strace rm -rf
On 07/16/2012 08:56 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Tim Bird tim.b...@am.sony.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to take Denzil out for a spin, and when I do bitbake, from inside
Sony (behind our corporate firewall) I get this:
(I was doing 'bitbake
Attendees:
Cristian, Laurentiu, Ciby, Bogdan, ScottR, ScottG, Mark, Russ, Saul, Denys,
Paul, Tom, Gilbert, Richard, MichaelH, BruceA, Josh, Sean, Jessica, Nitin,
Darren, Song
Agenda:
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* 1.2.1 release readiness - 10 min (ScottG)
- The release build has
Since you're providing your own value of QT_CONFIG_FLAGS I think you're
missing -embedded $QT_ARCH and possibly -qtlibinfix ${QT_LIBINFIX} (see
meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-embedded.inc).
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Whoops! I most certainly did forget
In an effort to explore how independent a layer could be to the
underlying hardware, I took the meta-baryon NAS layer and got it built
from master using the n450 BSP. With that working I decided to replace
the n450 with sugarbay. While the n450 can support X11 and sato, it was
not generated
Since you're providing your own value of QT_CONFIG_FLAGS I think you're
missing -embedded $QT_ARCH and possibly -qtlibinfix ${QT_LIBINFIX} (see
meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-embedded.inc).
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Whoops! I most certainly did forget
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 15:49:16 Jon Szymaniak wrote:
From what I gather looking
at recipes-qt/qt4/* a bit, the point here is to rename libs to
differentiate between the libs generated by the embedded and X11-based
recipes, right?
That's correct.
I ended up including -qtlibinfix
Hey Matthew -
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of McClintock Matthew-B29882
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:01 AM
I understand. I'm fine with adding stuff to the edison branch for now
and we can worry about another official release sometime
On 12-07-17 10:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-07-16 10:22 AM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com
These commits add emgd 1.14 driver support for linux kernel v3.4
These commits need to go in a new branch named emgd-1.14, so
that it can be merged
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Stewart, David C
david.c.stew...@intel.com wrote:
Hey Matthew -
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of McClintock Matthew-B29882
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:01 AM
I understand. I'm fine with adding stuff to
On 07/17/2012 04:43 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Stewart, David C
david.c.stew...@intel.com wrote:
Hey Matthew -
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of McClintock Matthew-B29882
Sent: Monday, July
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 15:24 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote:
In an effort to explore how independent a layer could be to the
underlying hardware, I took the meta-baryon NAS layer and got it built
from master using the n450 BSP. With that working I decided to replace
the n450 with sugarbay.
Hi,
I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were installed
but not shipped in any package:
WARNING: /etc
ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
installed but not shipped in any package:
WARNING: /etc
ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
yocto_3.2.bb
On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke,
On 12-07-17 8:25 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:30 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
yocto_3.2.bb
On
On 12-07-17 8:32 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:30 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not
Hello,
The beagleboard that I am using is XM.
I did not modify the kernel at
this is with no uEnv.txt
[vidal@ws009 ~]$ cat no_boot_scr.txt
* - * Qodem 0.1.2 Capture Generated Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:12:08 -0600 BEGIN *
- *
Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.5.0 (Jul 11 2012 - 21:01:18)
Beagle xM
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This commit changes emgd kernel driver for crownbay bsp to the emgd-1.14.
Thanks,
Nitin
The following changes since commit c2b5ee363bf2612932301488f3ac0644ff70fc7c:
meta: disable CONFIG_MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE (2012-07-14 00:21:49 -0400)
are
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
---
.../bsp/crownbay/crownbay-standard.scc |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/crownbay/crownbay-standard.scc
33 matches
Mail list logo
