Re: [yocto] RFC: Post build configuration

2013-04-09 Thread Venkata ramana gollamudi
I agree that each product might have different connectivity and different configuration needs on the rootfs. However current thoughts are based on 1) Some of the common configurations of YP are currently at build time in yocto project, but appying them doesnot require a rebuild. Such

Re: [yocto] Problem with mouse and keyboard detection in yocto (core-image-sato on emenlow)

2013-04-09 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi Andreas, On 8 April 2013 18:44, Andreas Enbacka aenba...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to rebuild the xf86-input-evdev; however the core-image-sato still insists on using the default mouse / keyboard drivers instead of evdev. Also no /dev/input/event* entries exist (only /dev/input/mice and

[yocto] systemd vs sysvinit

2013-04-09 Thread Satya Swaroop Damarla
Hi, I created two images first by using sysvinit and the other using systemd... The image using sysvinit works perfectly but the image with systemd works only from the second boot. In the first boot it hangs. What could be the possible reasons? Greets, Satya

Re: [yocto] what's the situation with MIPS support/BSPs/dev kits in yocto?

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-04-08 5:59 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: other than the canonical routerstation pro in the meta-yocto-bsp layer, is there any serious work being put into MIPS machines? a quick google didn't seem to find anything, and the rs pro itself

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 11:41 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: finally have the time to work my way through the ELC 2013 hands on kernel labs described here: https://www.yoctoproject.org/tools-resources/presentations/working-kernel since i'll almost

[yocto] i think the list of required software needs to be clarified

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i know i've mentioned this before, but it's still somewhat confusing if a new yocto user wants to figure out *exactly* what he or she must install manually on a yocto development host. there are a pile of web pages that claim to explain this:

Re: [yocto] i think the list of required software needs to be clarified

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i just found an old thread that i was in: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-July/025402.html i do notice what seems to be an inconsistency. from bitbake.conf: ASSUME_PROVIDED = \ bzip2-native \ chrpath-native \ git-native \ grep-native \

Re: [yocto] systemd vs sysvinit

2013-04-09 Thread Satya Swaroop Damarla
Hello Martin, I didnot find it.. Is it possible to send me a link so that I can work on it Greets, Satya On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:21:31PM +0200, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote: Hi, I created two images first by using

Re: [yocto] what's the situation with MIPS support/BSPs/dev kits in yocto?

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-04-08 5:59 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: other than the canonical routerstation pro in the meta-yocto-bsp layer, is there any serious work being put into MIPS machines? a quick google didn't seem to find anything, and the rs pro itself

Re: [yocto] what's the situation with MIPS support/BSPs/dev kits in yocto?

2013-04-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-04-09 10:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-04-08 5:59 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: other than the canonical routerstation pro in the meta-yocto-bsp layer, is there any serious work being put into MIPS machines? a quick google didn't seem

Re: [yocto] what's the situation with MIPS support/BSPs/dev kits in yocto?

2013-04-09 Thread William Mills
On 04/09/2013 07:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-04-08 5:59 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: other than the canonical routerstation pro in the meta-yocto-bsp layer, is there any serious work being put into MIPS machines? a quick google didn't

Re: [yocto] i think the list of required software needs to be clarified

2013-04-09 Thread Rudolf Streif
In a sense yes. From how I understand it, anything that is listed as a required utility in SANITY_REQUIRED_UTILITIES does not even have to be listed in ASSUME_PROVIDED. The required native utilites should fail the sanity test right away if they are not there. For any dependency listed in

Re: [yocto] RFC: Post build configuration

2013-04-09 Thread Rudolf Streif
Ramana, Maybe I do not understand what exactly you are looking for. Maybe you have some concrete examples. Anything that somehow changes the configuration of the target has to go into the root file system one way or the other. You can easily include packages into the root file system by adding

[yocto] /etc/inittab generated incorrectly?

2013-04-09 Thread Hans Beckérus
I am having an issue with the /etc/inittab file that seems to be incorrectly generated causing the following error at boot: INIT: version 2.88 booting INIT: /etc/inittab[42]: duplicate ID field 1usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using xusbps-ehci The reason for this error is due

Re: [yocto] systemd vs sysvinit

2013-04-09 Thread Martin Jansa
I meant this thread http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-March/037660.html But looking at it again, it probably won't help you much :/. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Satya Swaroop Damarla swaroop.dama...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Martin, I didnot find it.. Is it

[yocto] Patch version gotchas (was Re: i think the list of required software needs to be clarified)

2013-04-09 Thread Tim Bird
On 04/09/2013 06:10 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: SANITY_REQUIRED_UTILITIES ?= patch diffstat makeinfo git bzip2 tar gzip gawk chrpath wget cpio This is just a generic warning on the subject of native patch. We recently had a discussion on the LTSI-dev mailing list about patch. It seems that

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Trevor Woerner
Hi Robert, Since you're working your way through the labs, I was wondering if you'd be interested in testing something out for me? When I went through these labs I had set my PACKAGE_CLASSES to package_ipk instead of the default package_rpm. While doing so I had discovered a bug which I reported,

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Trevor Woerner wrote: Hi Robert, Since you're working your way through the labs, I was wondering if you'd be interested in testing something out for me? When I went through these labs I had set my PACKAGE_CLASSES to package_ipk instead of the default package_rpm. While

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: does this mean PACKAGE_CLASSES should be *exclusively* ipk, or that ipk simply be in there? Yes, that's how I had been testing it (exclusively package_ipk). ___ yocto

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: does this mean PACKAGE_CLASSES should be *exclusively* ipk, or that ipk simply be in there? Yes, that's how I had been testing it (exclusively package_ipk). well,

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Trevor Woerner wrote: Hi Robert, Since you're working your way through the labs, I was wondering if you'd be interested in testing something out for me? When I went through these labs I had set my PACKAGE_CLASSES to package_ipk instead of the default package_rpm. While

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: ok, so what am i looking for? I couldn't get lab3 to work fully unless I switched from package_ipk to package_rpm. The module would get built and included in the image, but it wasn't being loaded automatically during

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 18:06 -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: ok, so what am i looking for? I couldn't get lab3 to work fully unless I switched from package_ipk to package_rpm. The module would get built and

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 18:06 -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: ok, so what am i looking for? I couldn't get lab3 to work fully unless I switched from package_ipk to

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: I believe I tried and couldn't reproduce it. But if someone does reproduce it, please file a bug detailing the *exact* steps needed to reproduce. Thanks for the update, I wasn't 100% sure if you had found the time to

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: ok, so what am i looking for? I couldn't get lab3 to work fully unless I switched from package_ipk to package_rpm. The module would get built and included in the

Re: [yocto] How to partition a flash drive (solved)

2013-04-09 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
From: Paul D. DeRocco What's going wrong is that the code in the MBR created by gparted (and I assume by parted) unconditionally uses drive number 0x80 (the first hard disk) when it tries to load the zeroth sector from the bootable partition. The BIOS, however, is treating this eUSB

[yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, April 09, 2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US Canada).

2013-04-09 Thread Liu, Song
Attendees: Saurav, Beth, Ramana, DaveST, TomZ, RichardP, MichaelH, BruceA, KevinS, JeffP, BjörnS, Fahad, Cristian, Corneliu, JessicaZ, Ross, ScottR, Saul, MarkH, PaulE, AlexD, Nitin, Denys, Song   Agenda:   * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * 1.3.1 release update: - Beth: We hit some AB issues

[yocto] FW: Yocto Project 1.4 M5 release readiness review

2013-04-09 Thread Liu, Song
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT