[yocto] Yocto bug traige call for action: Please Verify Resolved bugs in bugzilla

2011-07-21 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Hi All, In today's bug triage meeting, we noticed there're total 564 bugs that are in "Resolved" status. The process is once a bug is in Resolved status, the original reporter of the bug should verify the resolution, either a valid fix or acceptable reason and mark the bug as "Verified". So

Re: [yocto] building crownbay images

2011-07-21 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 03:15 -0700, Andre Haupt wrote: > Hi all, > > I am new to Yocto and to Distro work in general. > > I want to use Yocto on the Kontron nanoETXexpressTT boards. > (http://de.kontron.com/products/computeronmodules/com+express/com+express+ultra/nanoetxexpresstt.html) > > These

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2][Image Creator] Hob Cache for speed up switching

2011-07-21 Thread Joshua Lock
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:39 +0800, Ke, Liping wrote: > Hi, Josh > > Yes, definitely this patch's importance is much less than the previous one. > But if more users are using hob, the cache would be very useful. > Because when using UI, users tend to switch between all combination of menu > frequ

Re: [yocto] best cfg for building all of yocto?

2011-07-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jul. 2011, om 18:43 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven: > On 07/21/2011 09:32 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Scott Garman >> wrote: >>> bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't >>> explicitly excluded due to mac

Re: [yocto] [bitbake-devel] [PATCH 1/1][Image Creator] Remove unused target tree data for Hob

2011-07-21 Thread Joshua Lock
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 11:04 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 21 jul. 2011, om 07:50 heeft Ke Liping het volgende geschreven: > > > From: Liping Ke > > > > Since Hob only needes package dependency information, we can > > create a new version of package information retrieving methods, > > remove task

Re: [yocto] best cfg for building all of yocto?

2011-07-21 Thread Scott Garman
On 07/21/2011 10:08 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Scott Garman wrote: On 07/21/2011 09:32 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Scott Garman wrote: bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't explicitly excluded due t

Re: [yocto] best cfg for building all of yocto?

2011-07-21 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Scott Garman wrote: > On 07/21/2011 09:32 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Scott Garman > > wrote: > > > bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't > > > explicitly excluded due to machine incompatibilities. It

Re: [yocto] best cfg for building all of yocto?

2011-07-21 Thread Scott Garman
On 07/21/2011 09:32 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Scott Garman wrote: bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't explicitly excluded due to machine incompatibilities. It doesn't generate a final image though, just all of the outp

Re: [yocto] best cfg for building all of yocto?

2011-07-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:32 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Scott Garman > wrote: > > bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't > > explicitly excluded due to machine incompatibilities. It doesn't generate a > > final image tho

Re: [yocto] best cfg for building all of yocto?

2011-07-21 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Scott Garman > wrote: > > bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't > > explicitly excluded due to machine incompatibilities. It doesn't generate a > > final image though, just all

Re: [yocto] best cfg for building all of yocto?

2011-07-21 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Scott Garman wrote: > bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't > explicitly excluded due to machine incompatibilities. It doesn't generate a > final image though, just all of the output packages. Is there an easy way to remove a specifi

[yocto] [PATCH] .gitignore: Update build ignores to have wildcard

2011-07-21 Thread Kumar Gala
ignore not just build/* but any build*/* cases. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- .gitignore | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b13086d..d44e729 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ *.pyc *.pyo -bu

Re: [yocto] best cfg for building all of yocto?

2011-07-21 Thread Scott Garman
On 07/20/2011 10:10 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: For a new bsp/target what's the best config choice to try and build all of yocto? Is it core-image-sato? - k bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't explicitly excluded due to machine incompatibilities. It doesn't gener

[yocto] statue of multilib?

2011-07-21 Thread Kumar Gala
Richard, I'm working on getting a ppc64 build going and looking close to having that done. I was wondering what the state of multilib support was as I'd really like to have that functional for the ppc64 system. Think this will also be useful to flush out any multilib issues by having another

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1][Image Creator] Remove unused target tree data for Hob

2011-07-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jul. 2011, om 07:50 heeft Ke Liping het volgende geschreven: > From: Liping Ke > > Since Hob only needes package dependency information, we can > create a new version of package information retrieving methods, > remove task dependency information, so that we can greatly > reduce data load