Re: [yocto] Building for pandaboard

2011-10-31 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 28 okt. 2011, om 19:06 heeft Brian Park het volgende geschreven: Thanks for the info. As I'm very new to Yocto, I'd not know how to create local.conf to build for panda, even knowing that the kernel will support pandaboard. How would I go about configuring Yocto to build for panda? If

Re: [yocto] Building for pandaboard

2011-10-31 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 28 okt. 2011, om 16:10 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Brian Park wrote: Hi, I'm interested in using Yocto to build linux for PandaBoard. It seems there are already patches some where that I can use to build for panda, as I found some discussions

Re: [yocto] is there a filesystem issue with kernel 3.0.x on pandaboards?

2011-10-31 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 okt. 2011, om 15:19 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: possibly off-topic but i'm sitting in a fedora/ARM talk right this minute at FSOSS/linuxfest at york u, and the presenter mentioned that when building fedora for pandaboards, they had to back off from kernel 3.0.4

Re: [yocto] Which filesystem for target?

2011-10-31 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 28 October 2011 23:11:22 Chris Tapp wrote: Which is the 'best' filesystem to use for an embedded device that's using a CF card? It needs to survive loss-of-power, have a RO root filesystem, allow user configuration data to persist and (ideally) only use 'Busybox' commands. This

[yocto] root paths in packages

2011-10-31 Thread Mike Tsukerman
Hello, I've build rpm packages and met some interesting things. In the rpm all scripts and files include root paths from machine that i've build on. how can i change that? -- Best regards, Mike Tsukerman jabber: miketsuker...@gmail.com jabber: war...@jabnet.org skype: w_a_r_z_o_n

Re: [yocto] is there a filesystem issue with kernel 3.0.x on pandaboards?

2011-10-31 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 29 okt. 2011, om 15:19 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: possibly off-topic but i'm sitting in a fedora/ARM talk right this minute at FSOSS/linuxfest at york u, and the presenter mentioned that when building fedora for pandaboards,

Re: [yocto] any objection to adding a PREMIRRORS section to the QS guide?

2011-10-31 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Robert, We do have a question addressed in the Yocto Project Reference Manual that talks about premirrors and how Poky finds stuff. See the H.24 section of the manual http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html. Maybe this information is a bit too buried

Re: [yocto] couple questions about cleaning up the Quick Start Guide

2011-10-31 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: Robert, Thanks for the stuff and the look here. Regarding your first point - I don't have a problem using the real link over the redirect. The only things that come to mind are if they work why change them? But, if the community wants the

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-romley: Fix BSP description in romley.conf

2011-10-31 Thread Bodke, Kishore K
Acked-by: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of tom.zanu...@intel.com Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 7:00 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: [yocto] [PATCH

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] meta-romley: change references to sugarbay in linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend

2011-10-31 Thread Bodke, Kishore K
Acked-by: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of tom.zanu...@intel.com Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 7:00 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: [yocto] [PATCH

Re: [yocto] what's the proper value for BB_NUMBER_THREADS?

2011-10-31 Thread Mark Hatle
On 10/30/11 11:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Christian Gagneraud wrote: On 30/10/11 15:32, Robert P. J. Day wrote: all the docs recommend twice the number of cores (AFAICT), yet the template local.conf file suggests that, for a quad core, the value of 4 would be