Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] busybox: Add setsid and cttyhack for tiny DISTRO_FEATURE

2012-06-13 Thread Khem Raj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/13/2012 10:21 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > At some point poky-tiny may need to come into oe-core, until > then... why do you think so. micro is also a distro with similar goals lives outside of OE-Core infact any distros live outside oe-core -BEG

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] busybox: Add setsid and cttyhack for tiny DISTRO_FEATURE

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
Note that this is a part of a larger series. The other patches are against meta-yocto, but the busybox change seemed more appropriate here than in a bbappend in meta-yocto. At some point poky-tiny may need to come into oe-core, until then... On 06/13/2012 10:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > When build

[yocto] [PATCH 3/3] tiny-init: Basic init mechanism for poky-tiny

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
Currently poky-tiny images will boot and run /bin/sh, which results in error messages to the console about being unable to open the tty and job control being disabled. The shell must be session leader to open the tty, and the tty must not be /dev/console (it should be a vt or a physical tty like t

[yocto] [PATCH 2/3] busybox: Add setsid and cttyhack for tiny DISTRO_FEATURE

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
When building very small systems, it can be useful to spawn a shell from a simple init script, rather than a full System V Init process. This requires the shell be the session leader and be able to open the controlling terminal if it is to have job control. Enable CONFIG_CTTYHACK and CONFIG_SETSID

[yocto] [PATCH 1/3] poky-tiny: Define the "tiny" DISTRO_FEATURE

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
Enable recipes such as busybox to modify their configuration based on a DISTRO_FEATURE for tiny distributions. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart --- meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf |6 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf

[yocto] [RFC PATCH 0/3] poky-tiny: Add tiny-init mechanism for poky-tiny distro

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
Provide a basic functional init mechanism for poky-tiny. This defines a new "tiny" DISTRO_FEATURE in poky-tiny.conf, updates the busybox config based on this DISTRO_FEATURE, and creates a new tiny-init recipe which is made the default VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager for poky-tiny. The busybox changes

Re: [yocto] RFC: poky-tiny: init procedure

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/13/2012 06:20 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On 06/13/2012 06:09 PM, Tim Bird wrote: >> On 6/13/2012 5:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >>> For those of you using poky-tiny or are interested in building very very >>> small systems, I would appreciate your thoughts here. >>> >>> Currently poky-tiny

Re: [yocto] RFC: poky-tiny: init procedure

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/13/2012 06:09 PM, Tim Bird wrote: > On 6/13/2012 5:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> For those of you using poky-tiny or are interested in building very very >> small systems, I would appreciate your thoughts here. >> >> Currently poky-tiny images will boot and run /bin/sh, which results in >> e

Re: [yocto] RFC: poky-tiny: init procedure

2012-06-13 Thread Tim Bird
On 6/13/2012 5:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote: For those of you using poky-tiny or are interested in building very very small systems, I would appreciate your thoughts here. Currently poky-tiny images will boot and run /bin/sh, which results in error messages to the console about being unable to open

Re: [yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/13/2012 03:50 PM, Stewart, David C wrote: >> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Ross Burton >> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 1:45 PM >> >> Hi, >> >> My current test hardware for Yocto work is a Celeron-class Sandy Bridge- >> based

[yocto] RFC: poky-tiny: init procedure

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
For those of you using poky-tiny or are interested in building very very small systems, I would appreciate your thoughts here. Currently poky-tiny images will boot and run /bin/sh, which results in error messages to the console about being unable to open the tty and job control being disabled (thi

Re: [yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Stewart, David C
> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Ross Burton > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 1:45 PM > > Hi, > > My current test hardware for Yocto work is a Celeron-class Sandy Bridge- > based micro PC. As is to be expected for a machine like this, i

Re: [yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-06-13 05:00 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 06/13/2012 01:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-06-13 04:52 PM, Ross Burton wrote: On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 21:47, Darren Hart wrote: Seems reasonable to me. We should probably have 32b and 64b of this machine as well. And x32… :) From

Re: [yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/13/2012 01:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 12-06-13 04:52 PM, Ross Burton wrote: >> On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 21:47, Darren Hart wrote: >>> Seems reasonable to me. We should probably have 32b and 64b of this >>> machine as well. >> >> And x32… :) > > From the kernel point of view, t

Re: [yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-06-13 04:52 PM, Ross Burton wrote: On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 21:47, Darren Hart wrote: Seems reasonable to me. We should probably have 32b and 64b of this machine as well. And x32… :) From the kernel point of view, these are just configuration extensions to a base, which is where t

Re: [yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Ross Burton
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 21:47, Darren Hart wrote: > Seems reasonable to me. We should probably have 32b and 64b of this > machine as well. And x32… :) Ross ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/y

Re: [yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-06-13 04:44 PM, Ross Burton wrote: Hi, My current test hardware for Yocto work is a Celeron-class Sandy Bridge-based micro PC. As is to be expected for a machine like this, it's got modern Intel graphics and wireless. Neither of which are supported by atom-pc, as it's nominally a "generi

Re: [yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/13/2012 01:44 PM, Ross Burton wrote: > Hi, > > My current test hardware for Yocto work is a Celeron-class Sandy > Bridge-based micro PC. As is to be expected for a machine like this, > it's got modern Intel graphics and wireless. Neither of which are > supported by atom-pc, as it's nominal

[yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

2012-06-13 Thread Ross Burton
Hi, My current test hardware for Yocto work is a Celeron-class Sandy Bridge-based micro PC. As is to be expected for a machine like this, it's got modern Intel graphics and wireless. Neither of which are supported by atom-pc, as it's nominally a "generic netbook" image. Let's face it -- it's a

Re: [yocto] Web HOB planning discussion

2012-06-13 Thread Osier-mixon, Jeffrey
I agree, it is looking really interesting. Some comments below. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Stewart, David C < david.c.stew...@intel.com> wrote: > * This could be a great way for an organization to implement a workflow > process using YP, rather than try to invent one themselves. We have go

Re: [yocto] Web HOB planning discussion

2012-06-13 Thread Stewart, David C
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kosem >Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:20 AM > >Hi, > >Here's the link to the wikipage for the design for WebHob that we've been >working on here at the London office. > >https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wik

Re: [yocto] Web HOB planning discussion

2012-06-13 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 13 June 2012 09:08:16 Darren Hart wrote: > The group/project concept is very interesting. > > One thing I didn't see in the video, and perhaps you just couldn't cover > it, is how do you specify settings in local.conf? LICENSE settings for > example? Some of these settings should be

Re: [yocto] Grub installation

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/13/2012 09:21 AM, Jürgen Messerer wrote: > Thanks for the tips. > > As far as I know is at the moment the new grub default. > How can I configure back to the old version 0.97? You could try with the standard PREFERRED_VERSION method, but I'm not sure if the installer scripts deal with tha

Re: [yocto] Grub installation

2012-06-13 Thread Jürgen Messerer
Thanks for the tips. As far as I know is at the moment the new grub default. How can I configure back to the old version 0.97? Best regards Juergen -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2012 18:01 To: Jürgen Messerer Cc: Mihai Li

Re: [yocto] qemux86 Image won't boot from CF

2012-06-13 Thread Jürgen Messerer
Thanks Darren for the tips. Meanwhile I realized that to that the PCMCIA is missing . I will follow your suggestion about writing an own machine config file. Best regards Juergen -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2012 17:56

Re: [yocto] Web HOB planning discussion

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/11/2012 07:20 AM, Jim Kosem wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the link to the wikipage for the design for WebHob that we've > been working on here at the London office. > > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.3_Web_Hob > > The direct link to the video screencast is here: > https://wiki.yoct

Re: [yocto] Grub installation

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/11/2012 07:54 AM, Jürgen Messerer wrote: > Dear Mihai, > > I would expect that grub should be installed in > core-image-minimal-qemux86.ext3 > Grub couldn't be found when running the image with runqemu. > >Any other ideas? This depends entirely on the image type. We do not install grub

Re: [yocto] qemux86 Image won't boot from CF

2012-06-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/12/2012 04:07 AM, Jürgen Messerer wrote: > Hi everybody. > > > > The following problem occurs when I try to start a x86 linux system from > CF-Card. > > > > I have generate a qemux86 core-image-minimal image with the latest pokey. > ... > VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, tr

Re: [yocto] Not booting on BeagleBoard xM 0x2

2012-06-13 Thread Ryan Julian
Hi Bruce, The build I'm using already includes Denys' patch. I was referring to Tomas' original problem, in which the MMC card successfully initialized, but the kernel still panics while trying to mount mmcblk0p2. These two seem unrelated, unless I'm mistaken. On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Br

Re: [yocto] something about gtk+-2.24.8.tar.bz2 that requires constant downloading?

2012-06-13 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 09:10:34 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-06-05 09:01, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Wang, Shane wrote: > >> Robert P. J. Day wrote on 2012-06-05: > >>>at this point, has the problem been identified? or does this still > >>> > >>> require a bugzilla sub

Re: [yocto] RaspberryPi Kernel - sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't

2012-06-13 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 12 June 2012 05:30:34 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-06-12 05:26, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > FWIW, we will be looking at fixing this exact workflow pretty soon > > although it may involve an extra explicit step to invalidate the stamps. > > IMO, if you run a specific step like "-c compile -

[yocto] Re : ERROR : QA issue : package AAAA rdepends on BBBB-dev

2012-06-13 Thread Kilou Zelabia
I'v tested with INSANE_SKIP_ += "dev-deps" and it worked fine Thanks, De : Paul Eggleton À : Kilou Zelabia Cc : yocto@yoctoproject.org Envoyé le : Mercredi 13 juin 2012 12h36 Objet : Re: [yocto] ERROR : QA issue : package rdepends on -dev On

Re: [yocto] ERROR : QA issue : package AAAA rdepends on BBBB-dev

2012-06-13 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 13 June 2012 09:38:32 Kilou Zelabia wrote: > What does this mean ? Why it is forbidden to have a run-time dependency on a > "-dev" package ? Because that's usually not correct. The -dev package includes headers and other development files for the target. Is that really what package A

[yocto] ERROR : QA issue : package AAAA rdepends on BBBB-dev

2012-06-13 Thread Kilou Zelabia
Hello everybody, When building a package within yocto I'm having  the following error : ERROR: QA issue : package rdepends on -dev Both and are built using custom recipes What does this mean ? Why it is forbidden to have a run-time dependency on a "-dev" package ? I'v seen

Re: [yocto] qemux86 Image won't boot from CF

2012-06-13 Thread Jürgen Messerer
Thanks a lot for the tips. I will check them. Best regards Juergen -Original Message- From: Andrea Adami [mailto:andrea.ad...@gmail.com] Sent: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2012 14:08 To: Jürgen Messerer Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] qemux86 Image won't boot from CF On Tue, Ju

[yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, June 12, 2012 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

2012-06-13 Thread Liu, Song
Attendees: Beth, Nitin, Saul, Jessica, ScottG, ScottR, Michael, Cristian, Tom, Richard, Bjorn, Gilbert, Denys, Alex, Paul, Jim, Mark, Josh, Jefro, Jeff, Sahad, Andrea, Russ, Laurentiu, Bogdan, Radu, Bruce, Song   Agenda:   * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * 1.2.1 update - 5 min (ScottG) - 13