Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [Question] libxml: How about add --with-catalog to EXTRA_OECONF ?

2013-08-29 Thread Robert Yang
I took a look at the libxml's git log, didn't see the explicit reason that why use the --without-catalog, so it seems reasonable to use the --with-catalog which will make the xmlcatalog work (if it can be built well with the option.) // Robert On 08/29/2013 09:46 AM, Li Zhijian wrote: Hi, I

Re: [yocto] bitbake -c populate_sdk -v poky-image

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 29 August 2013 10:11:31 Navani Srivastava wrote: In order to execute bitbake -c populate_sdk poky-image are we supposed to declare BUILD_ARCH or SDK_ARCH somewhere in local.conf file? Yocto Documentation has not mentioned anything like that. Just a doubt as bitbake poky-image is

Re: [yocto] bitbake -c populate_sdk -v poky-image

2013-08-29 Thread Navani Srivastava
You should set SDKMACHINE if you need the machine that runs the SDK to be a different architecture from the machine Please find the local.conf file which clearly shows SDKMACHINE is i686 and I want to build for arm1136 arch.. So MACHINE ??= EBboard is given where EBboard refers to arm1136

Re: [yocto] bitbake -c populate_sdk -v poky-image

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 29 August 2013 13:57:12 Navani Srivastava wrote: You should set SDKMACHINE if you need the machine that runs the SDK to be a different architecture from the machine Please find the local.conf file which clearly shows SDKMACHINE is i686 and I want to build for arm1136 arch.. So

Re: [yocto] confusion about DEPENDS vs RDEPENDS

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Hans, On Wednesday 28 August 2013 21:22:36 Hans Beckerus wrote: On 2013-08-28 6:06, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 28 August 2013 17:08:41 Hans Beckérus wrote: Hi, I am a little bit confused about how to handle these two and what they are supposed to solve. I have so far never used

Re: [yocto] confusion about DEPENDS vs RDEPENDS

2013-08-29 Thread Hans Beckérus
Hi Paul, On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: Hi Hans, On Wednesday 28 August 2013 21:22:36 Hans Beckerus wrote: On 2013-08-28 6:06, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 28 August 2013 17:08:41 Hans Beckérus wrote: Hi, I am a little bit

Re: [yocto] confusion about DEPENDS vs RDEPENDS

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Paul / Nicolas, On Wednesday 28 August 2013 15:15:27 Paul D. DeRocco wrote: From: Nicolas Dechesne if the source code changes, the version of the recipe needs to change too. if you change the source code without bumping the version, the package might not be rebuilt properly indeed.

[yocto] Lighttpd web server on BlueGiga's APx4 development board

2013-08-29 Thread vinayak.garad
Hi, I am using BlueGiga's APx4 development board which have Yocto BSP. It have Lighttpd web-server configured. I have seen that Lighttpd web-server on Yocto BSP uses cgi-bin and .json scripts for HTML. I would like to use cgi-bin and .xml tags for HTML. I visited Yocto's GIT server but didn't

[yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
It appears that the yocto-bsp script generates a kernel configuration that creates some warnings during kern-tools' kconf_check. The {{machine}}.cfg file has many non-hardware options, therefore the script warns. It seems like many of these should be in the standard kernel configuration. Is

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-29 11:36 AM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: It appears that the yocto-bsp script generates a kernel configuration that creates some warnings during kern-tools' kconf_check. The {{machine}}.cfg file has many non-hardware options, therefore the script warns. It seems like many of these should

Re: [yocto] OE recipes- linphone build error in poky-9.0.0 build environment

2013-08-29 Thread Amit Kumar
Thanks for replay, I have follow the steps suggested by Mr. Paul, but still i am facing an error. I wants to build the linphone along with my Yocto Project build environment setup. I found linphone recipes in openembedded git. I have added that recipe and also add the

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
Which kernel version ? This is linux-yocto-3.8 and the dylan-9.0.0 yocto. It's not about them being common or not, it's about BSPs following a base policy versus having wild, per-board behaviour. I've cleaned up many items from the yocto-bsp generated {{machine}}.cfg that are already added

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-29 02:56 PM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: Which kernel version ? This is linux-yocto-3.8 and the dylan-9.0.0 yocto. It's not about them being common or not, it's about BSPs following a base policy versus having wild, per-board behaviour. I've cleaned up many items from the yocto-bsp

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:36 -0400, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: It appears that the yocto-bsp script generates a kernel configuration that creates some warnings during kern-tools' kconf_check. The {{machine}}.cfg file has many non-hardware options, therefore the script warns. It seems like many

[yocto] Help with merging files

2013-08-29 Thread Timothy Bean
Hello all, I am a little new to Yocto and bitbake. Could someone please help me with probably some simple concepts that seem to be missing. I would like to build a initramfs image to boot to my device (Freescale i.MX6) I think I need to change the image type to cpio.gz for the output. But my

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
Some additional information: I noticed that the two CONFIG's are also defined in the fragment features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg. They are defined without using the non-hardware flag. -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Thursday, August 29,

Re: [yocto] Status of 1.5_M4 release candidate.

2013-08-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Flanagan, Elizabeth elizabeth.flana...@intel.com wrote: An update on where we are at: rc1 is still churning. There was one autobuilder issue with regards to genericx86 in nightly-x86-lsb. I've built this out by hand and populated the release with it as well as

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-29 5:39 PM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: Some additional information: I noticed that the two CONFIG's are also defined in the fragment features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg. They are defined without using the non-hardware flag. That's could be a contributing factor, if they have their bucket