[yocto] [patchwork][PATCH] parsemail.py: Improve status-change-through-email

Patch status can be edited through email by project maintainers only without any feedback if this is attempted by any other user, providing a poor user experience. This change extends the patch-status-through-email functionality to be performed by the series submitter also, and provides a

Re: [yocto] NVIDIA Drivers

I used rpm and deb, you mean dpkg (for deb) when you say package manager? 2017-03-29 0:43 GMT+02:00 Burton, Ross : > > On 28 March 2017 at 23:41, Alvaro Garcia wrote: > >> Then I installed the image into my device. Everything worked as expected >> but

Re: [yocto] Unpack hierarchy - jethro vs. krogoth

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:33 AM, wrote: > Is there a change to recipe parsing and/or variables between jethro and > krogoth? > I'm migrating from the former to the latter and have hit a patch failure. > Looking at the unpacked source, jethro has the relevant file

Re: [yocto] NVIDIA Drivers

On 28 March 2017 at 23:41, Alvaro Garcia wrote: > Then I installed the image into my device. Everything worked as expected > but the nouveau driver. Is this correct or I forgot some step? > I'd check that the package actually exists in your rootfs - use the package manager

Re: [yocto] NVIDIA Drivers

On 28 March 2017 at 22:47, Alvaro Garcia wrote: > I tried this guacamayo recipe https://layers.openembedded. > org/layerindex/recipe/3272/ but can't compile (too old, maybe > unmaintained?). Also tried the recipe xf86-video-nouveau (it is blacklisted > but in krogoth it

[yocto] NVIDIA Drivers

Hi, I have built an image based on poky core-image-x11. Everything went fine but the graphic card drivers. I want more resolution than the provided by vesa (800x600) so I really need this drivers. I tried this guacamayo recipe https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/3272/ but can't

Re: [yocto] Using ${SRCVP} in PR of BB file

Hi Ian, On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 9:27:01 AM NZDT Ian Welch wrote: > We are preparing to move to PRservice in Yocto to handle auto rolling > our revisions on every build. As an interim step we are doing some > reordering or our current PR and PV parameters in our bitbake files. Our >

Re: [yocto] Using ${SRCVP} in PR of BB file

On 3/28/17 1:27 PM, Ian Welch wrote: > Hello, > We are preparing to move to PRservice in Yocto to handle auto > rolling our revisions on every build. As an interim step we are doing > some reordering or our current PR and PV parameters in our bitbake > files. Our current syntax is as

[yocto] Using ${SRCVP} in PR of BB file

Hello, We are preparing to move to PRservice in Yocto to handle auto rolling our revisions on every build. As an interim step we are doing some reordering or our current PR and PV parameters in our bitbake files. Our current syntax is as follows and works as expected BB File SRC_URI

[linux-yocto] hid-multitouch driver missing from 4.8.3

I am using meta-intel BSP's on a board that has a multitouch device, but it isn't working. I need hd-multitouch.c, specifically. I checked the local kernel that was built, but didn't see the touch driver in there.

Re: [yocto] Remove a recipe's do_install_append() function in an append file

On 3/28/17 11:19 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:27:15AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Cody Piersall wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am building zsh from meta-oe layer, and it has a do_install_append() >>> function defined like

Re: [yocto] host sysroot

On 3/28/17 4:18 AM, Ran Shalit wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to understand what's the purpose of host sysroot (in > /build/tmp/sysroots/) ? > I see it contains a set of libraries too. But for cross compiling an > application in host isn't all we need is toolchain and target sysroot > ? If so,

Re: [yocto] Remove a recipe's do_install_append() function in an append file

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:27:15AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Cody Piersall wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am building zsh from meta-oe layer, and it has a do_install_append() > > function defined like this: > > > > do_install_append () { > > rm

Re: [yocto] multiple, different kernel images in one rootfs

On 3/28/17 2:53 AM, Richard Leitner wrote: > Hi, > I'm currently using Jethro and like to include multiple, different > kernel (fit)images (with different source branches/versions) in one > RootFS. When booting such a system the bootloader (U-Boot) will decide > which kernel to load. > There

[yocto] Release Candidate Build for yocto-2.3_M3.rc2 now available.

A release candidate build for yocto-2.3_M3.rc2 is now available at: http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-2.3_M3.rc2 Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible. Build hash information: meta-intel : 5587993816a6cb2ea46dffbb527bb04baa9bd660 meta-qt4 :

Re: [yocto] Remove a recipe's do_install_append() function in an append file

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Cody Piersall wrote: > Hello, > > I am building zsh from meta-oe layer, and it has a do_install_append() > function defined like this: > > do_install_append () { > rm -fr ${D}/usr/share > } > > which gets rid of lots lots of useful

Re: [yocto] Fwd: how to enable c++11 support in yocto

On 27 March 2017 at 05:58, Vadalasetti Sivanageswararao < vsivanag...@gmail.com> wrote: > cc1plus: warning: include location "/usr/local/include" is unsafe for > cross-compilation [-Wpoison-system-directories] > Your build is referring to host files so this is likely the problem. This is a bug

Re: [yocto] Remove a recipe's do_install_append() function in an append file

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Cody Piersall wrote: > Hello, > > I am building zsh from meta-oe layer, and it has a do_install_append() > function defined like this: > > do_install_append () { > rm -fr ${D}/usr/share > } > > which gets rid of lots lots of useful

Re: [yocto] how to enable c++11 support in yocto

Ok i will send mail to those people , Thankyou for your Help, and Please send me some text or docs Regarding your development of poky toolchain. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Vadalasetti Sivanageswararao < vsivanag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From:

[yocto] Remove a recipe's do_install_append() function in an append file

Hello, I am building zsh from meta-oe layer, and it has a do_install_append() function defined like this: do_install_append () { rm -fr ${D}/usr/share } which gets rid of lots lots of useful functionality, like context-aware autocompletion. Can a bbappend file get rid of that function, or

Re: [yocto] Questions

Hi Arun, You need to add poky manager support to Poky and install it by adding the following line to your build/conf/local.conf file. https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/How_do_I For the conf/local.conf entry please add this: IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " package" After that you have to bitbake a

Re: [yocto] Unpack hierarchy - jethro vs. krogoth

> On 28 March 2017 at 11:33 colin.helliw...@ln-systems.com wrote: > > Is there a change to recipe parsing and/or variables between jethro and > krogoth? > I'm migrating from the former to the latter and have hit a patch failure. > Looking at the unpacked source, jethro has the relevant file at >

Re: [yocto] Current situation with gobject introspection? (off-topic)

On 28-03-17 10:39, Burton, Ross wrote: Krogoth (2.1) isn't the latest, that's Morty (2.2) released in October 2016 and next month Pyro (2.3) is being released. So what happened to the missing two walker bots? :-) Kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Products Materiaalweg 4,

Re: [linux-yocto] How can we reduce boot time ?

On 2017-03-28 05:52 AM, Ran Shalit wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2017-02-23 1:43 AM, Ran Shalit wrote: Hello, Are there some steps we can do in Yocto in order to reduce boot time ? The steps you'd take with an image

Re: [yocto] Copying Static library to libdir of YOCTO

On 28 March 2017 at 12:02, Surya wrote: > I can see those libraries in the "usr/lib" directory of that particular > package which is generated in "tmp/work" folder . But somehow these > libraries are not copied to rootfs "/usr/lib" directory. > Static libraries are part of

[yocto] Copying Static library to libdir of YOCTO

Hello , I am facing some issues , when trying to copy static libraries like libaccess.a & liblang.a to ${libdir} of rootfs. I can see those libraries in the "usr/lib" directory of that particular package which is generated in "tmp/work" folder . But somehow these libraries are not copied

[yocto] host sysroot

Hello, I am trying to understand what's the purpose of host sysroot (in /build/tmp/sysroots/) ? I see it contains a set of libraries too. But for cross compiling an application in host isn't all we need is toolchain and target sysroot ? If so, than what's the purpose of host sysroot ? Thank you,

Re: [yocto] package managers

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 28 March 2017 at 11:00, Ran Shalit wrote: >> >> I understand from this that in target it will be possible to install a >> package, using the other package manager. > > > Why would you want to

[yocto] Unpack hierarchy - jethro vs. krogoth

Is there a change to recipe parsing and/or variables between jethro and krogoth? I'm migrating from the former to the latter and have hit a patch failure. Looking at the unpacked source, jethro has the relevant file at build/tmp/work/XXX-poky-linux-gnueabi/linmux/3.0.2-r0/driver/ whereas

Re: [yocto] package managers

On 28 March 2017 at 11:00, Ran Shalit wrote: > I understand from this that in target it will be possible to install a > package, using the other package manager. > Why would you want to do this? You'll need to install the package management tooling, and the database of the

Re: [yocto] package managers

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 28 March 2017 at 10:09, Ran Shalit wrote: >> >> Is it possible to configure more than one package manager in yocto ? >> Does it mean it will create install package for both ? > > > This is

[yocto] multiple, different kernel images in one rootfs

Hi, I'm currently using Jethro and like to include multiple, different kernel (fit)images (with different source branches/versions) in one RootFS. When booting such a system the bootloader (U-Boot) will decide which kernel to load. I've already done some searches on the Internet, but found only

Re: [linux-yocto] How can we reduce boot time ?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2017-02-23 1:43 AM, Ran Shalit wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Are there some steps we can do in Yocto in order to reduce boot time ? > > > The steps you'd take with an image produced from yocto would be the same

Re: [yocto] package managers

On 28 March 2017 at 10:09, Ran Shalit wrote: > Is it possible to configure more than one package manager in yocto ? > Does it mean it will create install package for both ? > This is explained in the documentation:

[yocto] Questions

Hi, How to install a command (pmount) in poky distribution. What are the steps to follow? Thanks, ARUNKUMAR K -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] package managers

Hello, Is it possible to configure more than one package manager in yocto ? Does it mean it will create install package for both ? Thank you, Ran -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Current situation with gobject introspection?

> On 28 March 2017 at 09:39 "Burton, Ross" wrote: > > On 28 March 2017 at 09:05, wrote: > > > So I wondered what the latest [krogoth] situation is – am I likely to be > > able to get this package to build, and where/how might I get

Re: [yocto] Current situation with gobject introspection?

On 28 March 2017 at 11:05, wrote: > > I’m currently using Jethro (though about to move to Krogoth), and have an external package which need gobject introspection. I’m building on 64-bit x86, for ARM iMX6 target. > > I’ve been searching around to work out if this is

Re: [yocto] Current situation with gobject introspection?

On 28 March 2017 at 09:05, wrote: > So I wondered what the latest [krogoth] situation is – am I likely to be > able to get this package to build, and where/how might I get started? > > Krogoth (2.1) isn't the latest, that's Morty (2.2) released in October 2016 and

[yocto] Current situation with gobject introspection?

I'm currently using Jethro (though about to move to Krogoth), and have an external package which need gobject introspection. I'm building on 64-bit x86, for ARM iMX6 target. I've been searching around to work out if this is possible under Yocto, but not sure which of the info I've found is