I threw the branch at the Yocto Project autobuilder today, produced a
number of failures:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Latest//?filter=b23dba19607412c8cc7d267d95354d65f5631088=commit
Ross
On 5 May 2018 at 01:26, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi All
>
> As you might have
Hello,
We are pleased to announce the latest release of the Yocto Project 2.5
(sumo-19.0.0) is now available for download at:
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-2.5/poky-sumo-19.0.0.tar.bz2
http://mirrors.kernel.org/yocto/yocto/yocto-2.5/poky-sumo-19.0.0.tar.bz2
A gpg
Hello,
We are pleased to announce the latest release of the Yocto Project 2.5
(sumo-19.0.0) is now available for download at:
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-2.5/poky-sumo-19.0.0.tar.bz2
http://mirrors.kernel.org/yocto/yocto/yocto-2.5/poky-sumo-19.0.0.tar.bz2
A gpg
On 05/10/2018 02:30 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
>
> Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
> the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.23 kernel.
Thanks for keeping this kernel version updated.
Much appreciated. I know
Thank you, Mark. Much appreciated and understood.
Would you be open to tagging the layer for rocko to the right commit and
applying the patches sent to the mailing list by Armin and Kai to master
so that we have known points to move forward?
Thank you,
Rudi
On 05/11/2018 10:45 AM, Mark Hatle
On 5/11/18 12:28 PM, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
> Echoing this: may I ask what the current maintenance status of
> meta-selinux is. It appears that no updates have been made for more than
> 9 months. This is of course not to blame anybody but out of concern that
> the layer is falling behind even more
Echoing this: may I ask what the current maintenance status of
meta-selinux is. It appears that no updates have been made for more than
9 months. This is of course not to blame anybody but out of concern that
the layer is falling behind even more and to find a solution.
In addition to Armin's
Hi!
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Grzegorz Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have the following problem concerning the file's ownership.
> In my recipe I install the new file to rootfs and change it's ownership in
> do_install function:
> do_install () {
>
This works fine. Thanks a lot! :-)
2018-05-11 14:10 GMT+02:00 Burton, Ross :
> Turns out this is due to uninative only having a limited subset of the
> conversion tables and fontforge checks for ones that we don't ship.
> The good news is that Khem sent a patch this
Turns out this is due to uninative only having a limited subset of the
conversion tables and fontforge checks for ones that we don't ship.
The good news is that Khem sent a patch this morning, but the
workaround right now is to disable uninative. This in your local.conf
will work:
INHERIT_remove
Hello forum.
After updating all my layers to the lastest state of the "rocko" branch, I
am getting this error in "meta-oe" layer:
| In file included from ../../git/fontforge/splinefont.h:36:0,
| from ../../git/fontforge/sd.h:34,
| from
Hello all, I have the following problem concerning the files ownership.
In my recipe I install the new file to rootfs and change its ownership in
do_install function: do_install () { install -p -m 644 file1 ${D}/
chmod 777 ${D}/file1 chown ${USER_DUMMY} ${D}/file1 }
12 matches
Mail list logo