On 11-09-01 04:41 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
Removed duplicate statement
I noticed that these patches are Signed-off, can you confirm
your Sign-off so I can add it to the patches?
Bruce
---
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/fishriver/fishriver.scc | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1
On 11-09-03 7:32 AM, Chris Tapp wrote:
On 2 Sep 2011, at 16:49, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com
wrote:
However, kernel configuration becomes a little bit more complicated
as this
is done by machine name. A kernel recipe will
On 11-09-03 12:45 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
To match the accompanying 1.6 systemtap upgrade.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta.
The following changes are available in the git repository at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-2.6.37-contrib.git
tzanussi/reenable-systemtap
On 11-09-05 12:04 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
This patchset re-enables utrace. Tested on qemuppc, qemux86, qemux86-64,
qemuarm (where it doesn't work, as expected - utrace doesn't currently
support arm), and sugarbay.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta.
merged to both 3.0 and yocto-dev (so it
On 11-09-05 12:05 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
This patchset re-enables utrace. Tested on qemuppc, qemux86, qemux86-64,
qemuarm (where it doesn't work, as expected - utrace doesn't currently
support arm), and sugarbay.
These patches are taken from the utrace-3.0 branch of the utrace git repo at
On 11-09-06 03:56 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Looks good. If we are merging this as config only, I've been
putting them in meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/
So I relocated this configuration to that directory. I'll have
it pushed out in the next
On 11-09-08 11:09 AM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 09/07/2011 10:49 PM, 蔡振军 wrote:
Hi ALL
QEMU run well with a pre-build kernel image from yocto site. Now just
change the kernel to one built myself, some error information appeared
about nfs. My kernel image version is 2.6.35 configured by
On 11-09-08 07:30 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
Cover letter for separating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G.
Typically a machine does not need both of 10/100 and 1G/10G drivers.
These look good now, but when I went to merge the patches I see they
are multipart, and html-ized. Which is causing me
On 11-09-09 07:09 PM, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody ran into kernel panic when boot up core-image-sato-sdk for
qemux86. I’ve been having this issue with several clean build for two
days. And my latest build tree is a freshly cloned tree against
poky-master with commit:
commit
On 11-09-13 3:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Commit 0b805cce57f61a244eb3b8fce460b14f1be442b3 dropped a change making
stop_cpus_mutex non-static, resulting in a build failure for 3.0.4-rt
kernels.
Restore the move to non-static from commit
6857336c7fddaf460a13adc0c395698fcf9423ff.
Acked. I'm doing
is still not part of the Linux-yocto-3.0
repository. Is there any reason it is being hold?
Thanks,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 1:30 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto
On 11-09-18 11:34 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
Add a 'blktrace feature' that turns on kernel support for blktrace, a
block I/O tracing tool. Added to 'standard' alongside similar tracing
tool config.
Ack'd. I've merged this to the 3.0 tree, and the
On 11-09-21 02:01 AM, Ni Qingliang wrote:
the linux-yocto was updated to 3.0.4, but why linux-libc-headers still
2.6.37?
They should match. In the past Khem has done the update on the
header packages, since there are nearly as many toolchain issues
with the headers as with the kernel.
I
On 11-09-21 4:33 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/emenlow-3.0.
merged and tracked for future updates. There's no SRCREVs for me to
update for this one, so you can take care of the meta-intel layer
SRCREV
On 11-09-29 04:17 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This allows us to move them out of the bsp config.
Good cleanup.
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
---
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/drm-psb/drm-psb.cfg | 13 +
On 11-09-29 04:17 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
Add a 'vesafb feature' that adds basic vesa framebuffer support.
This one is quite useful. I've seen a similar set of options
collected in other kernels and it has come in handy.
Bruce
Signed-off-by:
On 11-09-29 04:17 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset is another step in some cleanup I'm doing for
the meta-intel bsps, basically removing unneeded or redundant
options and abstracting out useful features, in this case a
new vesafb feature used
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:34 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset is another step in some cleanup I'm doing for
the meta-intel bsps, basically removing unneeded or redundant
options and abstracting out useful features, in this case a
new
there are other oe based configs and layers that can be
used for panda support as well).
Cheers,
Bruce
Thank you.
Brian
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 11-10-27 8:45 PM, Brian Park wrote:
Hi
On 11-11-07 10:56 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This just finishes up the previous set of meta-intel cleanups. All
machines were build- and run-tested.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0 and linux-yocto-dev.
The following changes since commit
On 11-11-08 02:22 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi All,
This is the patch to support rt in the kernel meta branch for romley.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta and linux-yocto-dev/meta.
pull into my local repos, I'll have an update for
On 11-11-16 10:45 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/15/2011 09:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-15 3:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following is a modified version the patch at:
Works for me as well, I'll update the variant in the yocto kernel
trees, while we wait to see if anyone upstream
On 11-11-16 11:00 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/16/2011 07:51 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-16 10:45 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/15/2011 09:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-15 3:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following is a modified version the patch at:
Works for me as well
On 11-11-21 11:01 AM, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote:
Hello List,
I have had an attempt to build a kernel from the git sources, trying
to checkout the v3.1.1 tag, but it appeared to be more difficult then
I thought. Most of the problem I have had with the yocto-specific
metadata and some of the extra
On 11-11-29 04:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
I'm experimenting with Matt Fleming's EFI_STUB patches. The first 10 patches
were working fine, but when I try to add the 11th, the do_patch fails. I found
that it isn't trying to apply the patches in the order listed in the recipe -
no in any other
On 11-11-29 07:46 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/29/2011 03:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-29 04:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
I'm experimenting with Matt Fleming's EFI_STUB patches. The first 10 patches
were working fine, but when I try to add the 11th, the do_patch fails. I found
On 11-11-29 07:41 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/29/2011 03:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-29 04:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
I'm experimenting with Matt Fleming's EFI_STUB patches. The first 10 patches
were working fine, but when I try to add the 11th, the do_patch fails. I found
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Darren Hart darren.h...@intel.com wrote:
On 11/29/2011 05:15 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/29/2011 04:41 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/29/2011 03:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-29 04:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
I'm experimenting with Matt Fleming's
On 11-11-30 05:31 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On 30/11/11 03:46, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 18:00:31 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'm sure it's in one of the docs i missed, but how does one cleanly
shut down a QEMU session and get
On 11-12-07 02:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
The following patches have been merged back from upstream to address various
issues with the EFI boot process. These are intended to be merged with
yocto/standard/base.
Please watch for a subsequent patch adding a
On 11-12-07 5:50 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following changes since commit 67ce7623909cef63927fd145026aaf371cf4abf1:
meta: bumping kver to v3.0.10 (2011-11-23 00:33:19 -0500)
Merged. Will push it out in the morning.
Bruce
are available in the git repository at:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:24 AM, David Nyström david.nyst...@enea.com wrote:
From: Koen Kooi [k...@dominion.thruhere.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 15:07
To: Paul Eggleton
Cc: Chris Larson; David Nyström; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re:
On 11-12-09 5:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
Tiny will define a core set of kernel policy options, such as proc, sys,
devtmpfs, futex, epoll, elf bin format, etc. It will not enable any
drivers, filesystems, debug options, or
you are fed the new tools.
Cheers,
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Darren
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 3:15 PM
To: Bruce Ashfield
Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: kernel-tools failure for linux-yoctort_3.0.bb for poky/edison
branch
On 11-12-13 6:05 PM, David Smoot wrote:
I'm still very new and very clueless but I humbly submit what looks like
a bug to me..
routerstationpro.conf in meta-yocto/conf/machine/ lists machine
features the hardware does not have.
http://www.ubnt.com/wiki/RouterStation_Pro lists the hardware
On 11-12-13 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of
linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as
connman) that expect more recent headers (if_alg.h is missing prior to
2.6.39). While the proper fix is to ensure these
linux/meta/cfg/ directory structure and that will tell us exactly
what is going wrong.
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 3:25 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Hart, Darren; yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 11-12-13 6:43 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/13/2011 03:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-13 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of
linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as
connman) that expect more recent
On 11-12-13 6:46 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
We hit another lock-step SRCREV bug earlier on the FRI2 BSP. This was
due mostly to my pushing the efi changes to meta-intel too early - but,
it highlights a maintenance step that I believe could be eliminated for
most boards.
We have a
On 11-12-14 12:47 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/13/2011 09:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-13 6:26 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Yes.
Its with poky Edison with poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev master branch I am using
for my build.
This is likely the problem. I use and test meta-kernel-dev
On 11-12-14 04:31 AM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
1. No mass storage needed to be accessed by usbgadget.
2. This is a router station switch, so it should not
be taken as a USB_NET device too.
Zumeng,
The comment from the bug reporter was also that the target
doesn't have USB slave
On 11-12-12 06:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/11/2011 09:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-09 5:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
Tiny will define a core set of kernel policy options, such as proc, sys,
devtmpfs, futex, epoll
On 11-12-14 01:07 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/14/2011 08:59 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-12 06:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/11/2011 09:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-09 5:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
Tiny
On 11-12-14 02:06 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/14/2011 10:43 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-14 01:07 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Heavily trimmed down to the remaining points of discussion...
Everyone thanks you. I thought of doing that as well on my
last reply.
So what does that mean
On 11-12-14 7:54 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
I made a mistake in specifying the machine branch name:
The new machine branch should be:
yocto/standard/cedartrail
instead of
yocto/standard/cedartview
Sorry about that.
No problem at all. I read the right thing even if you didn't
type it :)
On 11-12-15 5:23 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 21:47 +, Chris Tapp wrote:
Is anyone on this list considering (or working on) a BSP for the
Raspberry Pi (http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs) ?
For those that haven't seen it, it's a credit-card sized 'home pc'
aimed primarily
after applying the patches, the build went through, but the image does
not boot.
Darren might comment on that.
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:07 AM
To: Hart, Darren
Cc: Bodke
On 11-12-16 8:31 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
do_install() has changed over versions of kern-tools, ensure this matches
the latest sources as referenced by ${AUTOREV}. Without this, using
this bbappend against older kern-tools recipes will fail in very strange
and unexplainable ways. The edison recipe
-
From: Bodke, Kishore K
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 5:07 PM
To: Hart, Darren
Cc: Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: kernel-tools failure for linux-yoctort_3.0.bb for poky/edison
branch.
Hi,
I still get the same error below after changing the kern-tools-native_git.bb
file
On 11-12-21 04:09 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
This patch adds a similar linux-yocto-tiny recipe for fri2 that
my poky-tiny patch provides for qemux86. This one adds the necessary
bits to boot poky-tiny on fri2. The kernel increases in size by some
200k to accomodate the EFI, EG20T, and USB support.
On 11-12-21 10:24 AM, zumeng.chen wrote:
This patch has been validated by the following commands
on both CPUs with or without cache alias, which is for
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1429
Glad to see this. I was composing an email that had just this
question. Which bug, and
On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
branch to standard/tiny.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
---
meta/recipes-kernel
On 11-12-21 11:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/21/2011 07:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
branch
On 11-12-21 01:58 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
branch to standard/tiny.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny/ata.cfg |9 +
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny/core.cfg
On 11-12-23 08:10 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
On Dec 23, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 dec. 2011, om 09:37 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
On Friday 23 December 2011 09:28:31 Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 22 dec. 2011, om 16:06 heeft Jim Abernathy het volgende geschreven:
I
On 11-12-23 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 12/23/2011 12:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-23 08:10 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
On Dec 23, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 dec. 2011, om 09:37 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
On Friday 23 December 2011 09:28:31
On 12-01-03 11:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On (22/12/11 09:24), Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 10:07 PM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
There are two problems as follows shown:
1 ) for TMPFS, nothing need to be done in sys_msync,
sys_msync just return 0 for all arches.
2 ) But for MIPS CPUs with cache
On 12-01-04 12:15 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On (23/12/11 12:59), Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-23 12:52 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 dec. 2011, om 18:45 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
On 11-12-23 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 12/23/2011 12:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11
On 12-01-10 10:47 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
I created a core-image-sato using the meta-n450 BSP hoping I could work
with it on the Acer Aspire One 532h-2588. However, that netbook uses the
Atheros AR5B95 wireless NIC and the Atheros AR8132 wired NIC, which are
not recognized. Is there anything
On 12-01-10 11:31 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote:
On 01/10/2012 10:50 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-10 10:47 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
I created a core-image-sato using the meta-n450 BSP hoping I could work
with it on the Acer Aspire One 532h-2588. However, that netbook uses the
Atheros AR5B95
On 12-01-02 02:31 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset adds a new yocto/emgd-1.10 feature branch to linux-yocto-3.0,
alongside the existing yocto/emgd branch containing emgd-1.8.
Bruce, please don't merge this yet though - it depends on the new
On 12-01-10 03:55 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 15:50 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-02 02:31 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset adds a new yocto/emgd-1.10 feature branch to linux-yocto-3.0,
alongside the existing yocto
On 12-01-11 02:01 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote:
Bruce,
Can we enable SMP and virtio by default for qemux86/x86-64? This can achieve
huge perf boost for workload inside qemu. E.g. we enabled self-hosted image,
where we build yocto inside qemu.
Attached patch showes the kernel config option.
Is it
On 12-01-11 09:41 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
Hi,
I followed the example in the Yocto Project Development Manual for
setting up a local kernel repo and it didn't go so well.
A month or two ago I checked out Edison and was able to build all the
images required for Beagleboard and it booted fine
On 12-01-11 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
It will. I sent patches recently to make that the preferred version
in the master branch. Cherry picking that change would probably
be all you would need.
2
On 12-01-11 03:35 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
Just so I'm clear. You are asking about the switch to 3.0 as the
default ? If so, that was only done in master for the upcoming 1.2
release and not on the edison branch, so you wouldn't pick it up
by pulling.
On 12-01-12 10:21 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
Yet another follow up. I finally found my C3 Beagleboard and the
default kernel built off master yesterday works on that platform too.
I was able to do another build with the tips you guys gave and it
looks like it is picking up the kernel from my
On 12-01-12 11:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
The bitbake AUTOREV code should take care of updating the clone
of your local repo in downloads/git2. I take it that this isn't
happening ?
... haven't tried
On 12-01-12 11:48 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
I prefer to work this way, since managing patches in a source git
repository is much easier for me. If you only have a few patches,
then they can just be pushed
On 12-01-12 03:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 01/12/2012 12:39 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 19:03 -0800, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-16 8:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/16/2011 05:22 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
With the attached Darren's kern-tools-native_git.bb file
On 12-01-12 09:50 PM, James Abernathy wrote:
I'm trying to do the Developer Manual Appendix B example exactly as
written only changing the path to my home directory. When I get to
B.1.8.3, bitbake after patching the kernel calibrate.c and modifiing
the path to the local git repository for
On 12-01-12 03:39 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 19:03 -0800, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-16 8:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/16/2011 05:22 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
With the attached Darren's kern-tools-native_git.bb file, build was success.
Thanks
Kishore.
See
On 12-01-16 01:40 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I get build failure for the rt.
ERROR: Function 'do_patch' failed (see
On 12-01-12 08:14 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote:
Bruce,
Thanks for your efforts!
FYI: I haven't forgotten about this, I'm just reworking a few
things with the 3.2 kernel tree, and will include this as part
of that effort. It will all be available soon.
Bruce
Edwin
On 2012/1/11 20:43, Bruce
On 12-01-22 10:33 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
OK, hate to bring this up again but I must be doing something wrong.
My kernel changes don't appear to be getting picked up. I thought it
was OK before but then I did some real work on the kernel and that is
when I realized something isn't right.
On 12-01-19 4:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce, please apply to linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/base
Queued.
Bruce
Upstream-Status: Accepted (Linux 3.3)
If the MAC is invalid or not implemented, do not abort the probe. Issue
a warning and prevent bringing the interface up until a MAC is set
On 12-01-23 08:10 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-23 05:51, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/22/2012 08:12 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-22 13:19, James Abernathy wrote:
I have used both git and the tarball methods of bitbaking projects,
all of them derivatives of the examples in the Yocto
Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
Date: Mon Jan 16 13:45:11 2012 -0500
meta/rt: fix reference to non-existent patch
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
:100644 100644 8c4d748... 4b9e9ed... M
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/rt/rt.scc
Which is the error you
is completely removed. So you'll have to wait for my request to be
merged, or cherry pick the change.
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 10:06 AM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 12-01-23 7:26 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 01/22/2012 08:01 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-19 4:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce, please apply to linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/base
Queued.
I don't see this in the repository yet, is it still pending? I'm trying
to write a BSP
On 12-01-24 01:28 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-23 7:26 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 01/22/2012 08:01 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-19 4:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce, please apply to linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/base
Queued.
I don't see this in the repository yet
On 12-01-25 03:30 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 15:50 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-02 02:31 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset adds a new yocto/emgd-1.10 feature branch to linux-yocto-3.0,
alongside the existing yocto
On 12-01-17 9:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-12 08:14 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote:
Bruce,
Thanks for your efforts!
FYI: I haven't forgotten about this, I'm just reworking a few
things with the 3.2 kernel tree, and will include this as part
of that effort. It will all be available soon.
FYI
On 12-01-02 02:31 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset adds a new yocto/emgd-1.10 feature branch to linux-yocto-3.0,
alongside the existing yocto/emgd branch containing emgd-1.8.
Bruce, please don't merge this yet though - it depends on the new
functionality being
merged. Will let you know when all that's taken care of and it's safe to
pull this in.
merged with the emgd changes. Build testing now.
Bruce
Thanks,
Tom
The following changes since commit c979f1365b1eb74e882b2cbbc8407ec536ab6eb8:
Bruce Ashfield (1):
meta
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:51 AM, James Abernathy jfaberna...@gmail.com wrote:
While I've read enough to think I understand git, I get confused when it's
applied to real situations like Yocto. If I look at the Yocto Development
Manual, Appendix A, A.5.2.4 Changing Recipes-kernel, It brings up
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Jingdong Lu jingdong...@windriver.com
Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y instead of CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC=y
for beagleboard.
I've got this one queued in the next 3.0 update.
Cheers,
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Jingdong Lu
On 12-01-31 11:45 AM, autif khan wrote:
I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built.
I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a
working solution for the following :-)
This should be covered in the existing documentation and also the
more
On 12-02-01 1:45 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following changes since commit 59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593:
meta/beagleboard: Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y (2012-01-30 00:50:09
-0500)
are available in the git repository at:
On 12-02-01 10:42 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 02/01/2012 06:23 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-02-01 1:45 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following changes since commit 59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593:
meta/beagleboard: Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y (2012-01-30 00:50:09
-0500
On 12-02-03 5:21 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0.
The following changes since commit 70e86dc937a40c0dc7c84549de0e86bb09f12da3:
Bruce Ashfield (1):
meta/rt: update rt patch cache
Merged.
Bruce
On 12-02-06 03:18 PM, autif khan wrote:
I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built.
I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a
working solution for the following :-)
This should be covered in the existing documentation and also the
more
On 12-02-06 04:43 PM, autif khan wrote:
I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is
built.
I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a
working solution for the following :-)
This should be covered in the existing documentation and also the
more
On 12-02-06 5:10 PM, autif khan wrote:
\ I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is
built.
I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a
working solution for the following :-)
This should be covered in the existing documentation and also the
more
On 12-02-06 8:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-02-06 5:10 PM, autif khan wrote:
\ I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before
its is
built.
I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I
have a
working solution for the following :-)
This should be covered
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:08 PM, David Smoot davidsm...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to change some of the kernel configuration options for my
routerstation pro. I have a .config from a 2.6.37 kernel running on my
routerstation pro that was not built in Yocto that has the options I want to
build
On 12-02-15 06:20 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:24 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Hollis Blanchard
hollis_blanch...@mentor.com wrote:
Hi, I'm sure I'm missing something simple, but I just built Poky from
git
for beagleboard, and can't
On 12-02-16 03:16 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to use a cloned/modified copy of the
linux-yocto-3.0 git repository. Here's what I did:
* cloned linux-yocto-3.0.git and committed to the meta branch
* specified my new repo:
Very strange. Is this from the yocto master
On 12-02-16 05:06 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On 02/16/2012 01:43 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Hollis Blanchard
hollis_blanch...@mentor.com wrote:
Yeah, I've looked through there, but where should stdout (i.e. those
echo
commands) be appearing?
I'd
On 12-02-16 05:50 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On 02/16/2012 02:11 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-02-16 03:16 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to use a cloned/modified copy of the
linux-yocto-3.0 git repository. Here's what I did:
* cloned linux-yocto-3.0.git
301 - 400 of 2361 matches
Mail list logo
