Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta/beagleboard: Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y

2012-01-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, wrote: > From: Jingdong Lu > > Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y instead of CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC=y > for beagleboard. I've got this one queued in the next 3.0 update. Cheers, Bruce > > Signed-off-by: Jingdong Lu > --- >  .../kernel-cache/bsp/beagleboard/beagl

Re: [yocto] Understanding the git commits for Yocto and meta

2012-01-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, James Abernathy wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:51 AM, James Abernathy > wrote: > > While I've read enough to think I understand git, I get confused when it's > >

Re: [yocto] So what happened to Edison??

2012-01-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy wrote: > It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a build on > edison branch for meta-cedartrail.  I copied it to meta-mycdv, but other > than that same, old same old. I tried the  standard unchanged SRCREV and > also tried the lates

Re: [yocto] How do I patch the kernel before it is built?

2012-01-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-01-31 11:45 AM, autif khan wrote: I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built. I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a working solution for the following :-) This should be covered in the existing documentation and also the more gener

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta: sys940x BSP meta data

2012-02-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-01 01:45 PM, Darren Hart wrote: The Inforce SYS940x-ECX Developer-Ready Reference Platform features: o Intel Atom E6xx (0.6-1.6 GHz) o Up to 1GB on-board DDR2 o Intel Platform Controller Hub EG20T o VGA,LVDS o HD Audio o SD Card o Dual SATA o Mini-PCIe http://www.inforcecomputing.com/SY

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2][linux-yocto-3.0] sys940x BSP and boot-live consolidation

2012-02-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-01 1:45 PM, Darren Hart wrote: The following changes since commit 59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593: meta/beagleboard: Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y (2012-01-30 00:50:09 -0500) are available in the git repository at: git://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-yocto-3.0

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2][linux-yocto-3.0] sys940x BSP and boot-live consolidation

2012-02-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-01 10:42 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 02/01/2012 06:23 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-02-01 1:45 PM, Darren Hart wrote: The following changes since commit 59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593: meta/beagleboard: Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y (2012-01-30 00:50:09 -0500

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] fri2: use emgd-1.10

2012-02-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-03 5:21 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0. The following changes since commit 70e86dc937a40c0dc7c84549de0e86bb09f12da3: Bruce Ashfield (1): meta/rt: update rt patch cache Merged. Bruce are available in the git

Re: [yocto] How do I patch the kernel before it is built?

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:35 PM, autif khan wrote: I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built. I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a working solution for the following :-) >>> >>> This should be covered in the existing doc

Re: [yocto] How do I patch the kernel before it is built?

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:35 PM, autif khan wrote: I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built. I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a working solution for the following :-) >>> >>> This should be covered in the existing doc

Re: [yocto] How do I patch the kernel before it is built?

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-06 03:18 PM, autif khan wrote: I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built. I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a working solution for the following :-) This should be covered in the existing documentation and also the more gener

Re: [yocto] How do I patch the kernel before it is built?

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-06 04:43 PM, autif khan wrote: I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built. I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a working solution for the following :-) This should be covered in the existing documentation and also the more gene

Re: [yocto] How do I patch the kernel before it is built?

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-06 5:10 PM, autif khan wrote: \> I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built. I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a working solution for the following :-) This should be covered in the existing documentation and also

Re: [yocto] How do I patch the kernel before it is built?

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-06 8:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-02-06 5:10 PM, autif khan wrote: \>>>>>>>>> I could not find a way to patch the kernel source before its is built. I promise to update the Yocto wiki's How do I section when I have a working solution for the

Re: [yocto] applying a custom kernel configuration to the "built in" routerstation pro bsp?

2012-02-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:08 PM, David Smoot wrote: > I want to change some of the kernel configuration options for my > routerstation pro.  I have a .config from a 2.6.37 kernel running on my > routerstation pro that was not built in Yocto that has the options I want to > build in Yocto.  I am at

Re: [yocto] missing USB gadget support on beagleboard?

2012-02-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-15 06:20 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On 02/14/2012 10:24 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: Hi, I'm sure I'm missing something simple, but I just built Poky from git for beagleboard, and can't figure out USB networking. I expe

Re: [yocto] trouble using a local kernel repo

2012-02-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-16 03:16 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: I'm trying to figure out how to use a cloned/modified copy of the linux-yocto-3.0 git repository. Here's what I did: * cloned linux-yocto-3.0.git and committed to the meta branch * specified my new repo: Very strange. Is this from the yocto master

Re: [yocto] trouble using a local kernel repo

2012-02-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-16 05:06 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On 02/16/2012 01:43 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: Yeah, I've looked through there, but where should stdout (i.e. those echo commands) be appearing? I'd guess it's failing before that.

Re: [yocto] trouble using a local kernel repo

2012-02-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-16 05:50 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On 02/16/2012 02:11 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-02-16 03:16 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: I'm trying to figure out how to use a cloned/modified copy of the linux-yocto-3.0 git repository. Here's what I did: * cloned linux-yocto-3

Re: [yocto] trouble using a local kernel repo

2012-02-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-16 06:18 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On 02/16/2012 03:02 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: That's the problem. I have a patch that detects this and abort is a non bare upstream is used. I just need to send them .. which I'll do when I get back to my desk next week. There are two

Re: [yocto] trouble using a local kernel repo

2012-02-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-16 06:52 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On 02/16/2012 03:25 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: The point is that the tree is local to your machine, but it doesn't have to be. You may only have push, not direct commit access. It's really not asking for anything that isn't already

Re: [yocto] trouble using a local kernel repo

2012-02-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-17 11:45 AM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On 02/16/2012 03:02 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: That's the problem. I have a patch that detects this and abort is a non bare upstream is used. I just need to send them .. which I'll do when I get back to my desk next week. There are two

Re: [yocto] missing kernel in rootfs image

2012-02-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-24 03:29 AM, Joshua Immanuel wrote: On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:10 +0530, Joshua Immanuel wrote: While trying to generate my custom rootfs image, I added the linux_yocto_3.0.bbappend file to my custom layer and specified the KMACHINE, SRCREV and COMPATIBLE_MACHINE variables. I fin

Re: [yocto] [KERNEL] [PATCH 0/1] Add PVR feature for Cedartrail

2012-02-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-24 7:35 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote: From: Kishore Bodke Hi, This is a new feature added to enable PVR for the Cedartrail BSP in the kernel. Please pull into meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg for both linux-yocto-3.0 and linux-yocto-3.2 . Looks good. Merging this in, and creating t

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto-tiny: Bump SRCREV and PV to 3.0.18

2012-02-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-27 12:04 AM, Darren Hart wrote: Bring linux-yocto-tiny inline with the other 3.0 linux-yocto-* recipes. Built and booted for qemux86. I'm just about to pull the trigger (i.e. a matter of hours) on 3.0.22. If you want to wait for that, or let this stand, either is fine with me, but I th

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto-tiny: Bump SRCREV and PV to 3.0.18

2012-02-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-27 12:13 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 02/26/2012 09:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-02-27 12:04 AM, Darren Hart wrote: Bring linux-yocto-tiny inline with the other 3.0 linux-yocto-* recipes. Built and booted for qemux86. I'm just about to pull the trigger (i.e. a matter of

Re: [yocto] [KERNEL][PATCH 1/1] enable pvr features.

2012-02-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-24 7:35 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote: From: Kishore Bodke Cedartrail has pvr kernel features and patches. Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke --- meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/drm-cdvpvr.cfg |9 + meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/drm-cdvpvr.scc |2 ++ 2 files changed, 11 inser

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-02-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-28 01:51 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i asked this on the beagle list, and koen pointed out that it was probably more appropriate elsewhere (probably here). what's the proper algorithm for building the leading-edge images for a beagle xM (rev C)? i realize there's canonical suppo

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-02-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-28 4:55 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto layers. That means that it gets the yocto standard QA builds and boot testing. That being

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta-kernel-dev: Fix quoting

2012-02-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
ned-off-by: Darren Hart CC: Tom Zanussi CC: Bruce Ashfield --- .../kern-tools-native_git.bbappend |2 +- meta-kernel-dev/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-korg.bb | 11 +-- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-dev.bb|4 ++-- .../recipes-kernel/linux/l

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [KERNEL] enable Cedarview config parameters

2012-03-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-29 07:13 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote: From: Kishore Bodke Hi, This patch is to enable Cedarview config parameters and add the kernel patches to the yocto/pvr branch in linux-yocto-3.0 and linux-yocto-3.2 tree. The patch itself looks ok. When merging features like this, we ty

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 00/11][linux-yocto-3.0] Backport fixes and add FRI2 support to pch_uart

2012-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-01 06:58 PM, Darren Hart wrote: Backport 7 patches bringing pch_uart up to date with required fixes and new features to support the 4 new patches (from me) enabling the FRI2 serial port. My patches have been sent to LKML and have received the approval one of the driver maintainers. They

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 3/3] fri2: Add SMP and EFI support

2012-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: Rather than add these as features in the linux-yocto recipe, include them in the BSP meta-data directly. Include only the core EFI bits in the fri2.scc, and add the extended EFI support to the fri2-standard.scc so that other ktypes don't pull in more than

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/5][linux-yocto-3.2] Backport fixes and add FRI2 support to pch_uart

2012-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: Backport consle support and add the 4 new patches (from me) enabling the FRI2 serial port. My patches have been sent to LKML and have received the approval one of the driver maintainers. They are currently pending review and a pull from Greg KH. Please a

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/6] Remove boot-live cfg duplication from BSPs

2012-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: From: Darren Hart Several BSPs duplicated the boot-live fragment in their BSP specific config. Remove the duplication and add CONFIG_RD_GZIP and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR to the boot-live fragment. Looks fine to me as well. That's a better place for the common

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 4/6] eg20t: Enable serial console for the pch_uart

2012-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: From: Darren Hart The FRI2 uses the pch_uart driver for the serial console. Enable the console driver. It this safe for all eg20t users ? I see the crownbay also uses this. Bruce Signed-off-by: Darren Hart --- meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/eg20t/

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 5/6] fri2: Add SMP and EFI support

2012-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: From: Darren Hart Rather than add these as features in the linux-yocto recipe, include them in the BSP meta-data directly. Include only the core EFI bits in the fri2.scc, and add the extended EFI support to the fri2-standard.scc so that other ktypes don't

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 6/6] fri2: Move non-hardware optional features out of fri2.scc

2012-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: From: Darren Hart Move policy features out of fri2.scc and into the fri2-KTYPE.scc files. This allows KTYPEs like tiny to build smaller kernels while still reusing the fri2.scc file. Exactly. Good factoring of the options. I had one question on the ser

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [KERNEL] enable Cedarview config parameters

2012-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
rail%3Aoss&rev=10 I'll update the header during the merge to have this reference. We have tested it on 3.0, but not yet tried on 3.2. In this case, I'll merge to 3.0, and we can do a forward propagation when we know 3.2 works. Bruce Thanks Kishore. -Original Messag

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 4/6] eg20t: Enable serial console for the pch_uart

2012-03-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-02 4:40 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 03/02/2012 01:16 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: From: Darren Hart The FRI2 uses the pch_uart driver for the serial console. Enable the console driver. It this safe for all eg20t users ? I see the crownbay also

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto/meta-yocto: update kernel SRCREVs

2012-03-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
to: v3.2.9, v3.0.23 + fixes and updates (2012-03-04 22:44:23 -0500) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib zedd/kernel-yocto http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel-yocto Bruce Ashfield (1): linux-yocto/meta-yocto: v3.2.9, v3.0.23 +

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/meta-yocto: v3.2.9, v3.0.23 + fixes and updates

2012-03-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
-rt38 - linux-yocto/rt: update to 3.2.9-rt15 These have been built for all qemu targets, and built for the appropriate hardware platforms. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend |2 +- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend |8

Re: [yocto] iptables not building on master

2012-03-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-06 06:41 AM, Robert Yang wrote: Hi Dexuan, After more investigation, I found that the: -I/path/to/sysroot/usr/include has been treated as the standard system include directory, and from gcc's manual: -I dir Add the directory dir to the list of directories to be searched for header

Re: [yocto] iptables not building on master

2012-03-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-06 10:24 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On 03/06/2012 07:21 AM, Robert Yang wrote: On 03/06/2012 11:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On 03/06/2012 01:04 AM, Robert Yang wrote: Hi Tom, Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers a kernel header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-m

Re: [yocto] iptables not building on master

2012-03-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-06 12:28 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Nominally it is to protect them from kernel headers changes and to not require headers or a full tree to be present (or at least this is what I've learned over the years, I may be forgetting

Re: [yocto] yocto and LTSI

2012-03-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-09 07:20 AM, David Nyström wrote: Hi All, Whats yoctos take on LTSI ? http://git.linuxfoundation.org/?p=ltsi-kernel.git;a=summary http://lwn.net/Articles/484337/ I've noticed that LTT-ng and other kernel patches are independently ported and maintained by the yocto project. Are there a

Re: [yocto] yocto and LTSI

2012-03-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-09 09:36 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: On 03/09/2012 08:43 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-03-09 07:20 AM, David Nyström wrote: Hi All, Whats yoctos take on LTSI ? http://git.linuxfoundation.org/?p=ltsi-kernel.git;a=summary http://lwn.net/Articles/484337/ I've noticed that LTT-n

Re: [yocto] [KERNEL] [PATCH 0/1] Additional pvr patches

2012-03-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-09 02:03 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote: From: Kishore Bodke Hi, These addtional patches enable Cedarview hdmi and acpi. Please pull thme to the yocto/pvr branch in linux-yocto-3.0 tree. Looks fine. will Merge it shortly and send a confirmation. Bruce Thanks Kishore. The

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/3][KERNEL] emgd 1.10 for linux-yocto 3.2

2012-03-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-12 11:09 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi Hi Bruce, Please pull in the emgd-1.10 topic branch below into linux-yocto-3.2. Thanks, Tom The following changes since commit 417fc778a86e81303bab5883b919ee422ec51c04: Bruce Ashfield (1): perf: hard-code

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-crownbay: switch to linux-yocto-3.2 kernel

2012-03-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:30 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> Some thoughts on this with respect to cleaning up and simplifying the >> recipes per our earlier discussions. >> >> On 03/12/2012 09:37 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: >> >

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-crownbay: switch to linux-yocto-3.2 kernel

2012-03-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-13 11:03 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:30 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: Hi Tom, Some thoughts on this with respect to cleaning up and simplifying the recipes

Re: [yocto] [KERNEL][PATCH 0/1] meta: Create scc file for pvr merge

2012-03-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-13 2:12 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote: From: Kishore Bodke Hi, This patch is to create a new scc file for merging the yocto/pvr branch for the targets with the appropriate hardware support. Just so I'm clear, there are no current users of this in the tree, but we want to stage

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-crownbay: switch to linux-yocto-3.2 kernel

2012-03-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-14 12:05 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 03/13/2012 08:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-03-13 11:03 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:30 -0700, Darren Hart

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-crownbay: switch to linux-yocto-3.2 kernel

2012-03-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-14 10:45 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 03/13/2012 09:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-03-14 12:05 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 03/13/2012 08:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-03-13 11:03 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Mar 13

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-crownbay: switch to linux-yocto-3.2 kernel

2012-03-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-14 4:40 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 03/14/2012 01:25 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-03-14 10:45 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 03/13/2012 09:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-03-14 12:05 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 03/13/2012 08:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-03-13 11:03 PM, Tom

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 00/17][KERNEL] emenlow updates for linux-yocto 3.2

2012-03-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-13 11:57 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi Hi Bruce, Please pull this patchset into linux-yocto-3.2, standard/default/emenlow. merged. I'm building this along with my other updates, will push when they complete. Bruce Thanks, Tom The following changes since com

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto-3.2/meta] fri2 update

2012-03-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-14 02:56 PM, Darren Hart wrote: The following changes since commit 64840f55ee144e9814278eaa8e3f33dd60da892c: meta/emgd: emgd 1.10 updates (2012-03-12 11:48:22 -0400) Queued with my other 3.2 changes. Should be pushed out tomorrow. Bruce are available in the git repository at:

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto-3.0/meta] fri2 update

2012-03-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-14 02:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: From: Darren Hart The following changes since commit e559129b4a6f39f68b75141096b2d516cf7a7f35: fri2: Add SMP and EFI support (2012-03-02 16:02:35 -0500) Queued with my consolidated updates. Bruce are available in the git repository at: git://

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] perfer older version of lttng-ust in poky distro

2012-03-20 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-20 8:59 PM, Saul Wold wrote: On 03/14/2012 01:27 AM, Lianhao Lu wrote: Set the PREFERRED_VERSION of lttng-ust to use lttng-ust instead of lttng2-ust in poky distro. This fixed yocto bug #2062. The lttng2 is very different in terms of architecture and usage model, compared to lttng. The

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [linux-yocto-3.2][meta] common-pc: Add PCNET32 to the config

2012-03-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-23 05:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote: In support of the self-hosted-image, add CONFIG_PCNET32 to the common-pc BSP default cfg. This enables the qemux86 image to be run on both qemux86 machines as well as the vmware 32b machine. Since the qemux86 machine optionally supports pcnet, this seems a

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] sato: Remove questioned ISO image

2012-03-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-26 05:19 PM, Yang Shi wrote: [YOCTO #1487] For the liveCD image, interactive bootup is needed, but psplash prevents from booting interactively. In such case ISO image is not usable, so remove ISO image and the corresponding link and throw error info to warn outside to enable unionfs in

Re: [yocto] Suspicious warnings while beta testing yocto 1.2

2012-03-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-30 01:18 PM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: While beta testing yocto 1.2 I'm building for beagleboard with: OE Build Configuration: BB_VERSION= "1.15.1" TARGET_ARCH = "arm" TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" MACHINE = "beagleboard" DISTRO= "poky" DISTRO_VER

Re: [yocto] Suspicious warnings while beta testing yocto 1.2

2012-03-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: > On 03/30/2012 01:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> There are a few outstanding items for 1.2 as part of M4 .. one of >> them is squashing the remaining configuration values that are >> causing warnings. > &

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/3][linux-yocto-3.2][meta] tiny: Refactor tiny ktype config

2012-03-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-31 10:44 AM, Darren Hart wrote: Prepare for the linux-yocto-tiny_3.2 recipe by consolidating the tiny config and factoring out what should be common functinionality. Once included, I'll send the linux-yocto-tiny_3.2 patch against oe-core with the proper SRCREV_meta. The other linux-yoct

Re: [yocto] should the dev docs match the dev yocto source?

2012-04-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-04-04 05:29 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: just noticed that BSP guide suggests 3.0 is the preferred linux kernel, while the source itself is now up to 3.2. should those match? this is for *development* streams of both. Not necessarily. It depends on the target. We haven't moved everyth

Re: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto.

2012-04-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-04-04 04:46 AM, Om Prakash PAL wrote: Hi, I want to build my local kernel/Driver code, not the default one. please help how can i do it ?. any wiki/docs on this?. The BSP developer guides show how to extend the yocto kernels, and also have sections on custom/different kernel versions. Hav

Re: [yocto] Not booting on BeagleBoard xM 0x2

2012-04-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-04-04 08:04 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: Hi Tomas, On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Tomas Frydrych wrote: Hi, I am trying to get Yocto image built from yesterday's master (Linux-3.0.23-yocto-standard) to boot on the NAND-less version of BeagleBoard xM, but the kernel panics with: -

Re: [yocto] Edison BSP SRCREV

2012-04-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-04-04 6:36 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: I've been following the "BSP Development Example" section of the "Yocto Project Development Manual" for a new BSP called "mybsp". This results in the following in linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend: COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_mybsp = "mybsp" KMACHINE_mybsp = "yocto/standa

Re: [yocto] using and auditing kernel config fragments

2012-04-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to add a kernel config fragment to the yocto 2.6.37 kernel > for BeagleBoard, because I need a driver for a rt2800usb dongle. > > For some reason which I cannot work out, the rt2800usb options are > removed (rather then di

Re: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto.

2012-04-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
o any package. They'll be applied to subsequent builds of the kernel. I'm skipping a lot of detail there, but it is all found in the various manuals, and I don't want to repeat it here. Cheers, Bruce Please help me. Thanks a lot in advance. Best Regards, Om Prakash Pal ____

Re: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto.

2012-04-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
oard, Cheers, Bruce > > Thanks in advance. > Best Regards, > Om Prakash Pal > > From: Bruce Ashfield [bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 9:32 AM > To: Om Prakash PAL > Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org >

Re: [yocto] Reconfiguring the kernel

2012-04-10 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-04-10 04:40 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: I think this is a summary of the steps needed to reconfigure the kernel,based on the instructions in the 6.0.1 dev manual: 1) bitbake linux-yocto -c clean 2) bitbake linux-yocto -c menuconfig 3) bitbake linux-yocto -c compile -f 4) bitbake linux-yocto Ho

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-07-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-07-08 11:16 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 28 June 2013 14:36:48 Khem Raj wrote: On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:22 AM, "Rifenbark, Scott M" wrote: I count eight meta-* layers in the YP repositories that don't exist in the OE area. I understand what you are saying though and I can word it tha

Re: [yocto] CONFIG_HID_APPLE

2013-07-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: > Can CONFIG_HID_APPLE=m please be added to the kernel defconfigs? Apple > keyboards don't work without it. > That's not something that most boards need. So it belongs in a feature fragment that can be activated via a custom layer (KERNEL_FEATUR

Re: [yocto] [meta-yocto-bsp] [dylan] linux-yocto_3.2 version mismatch

2013-07-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-07-13 10:27 AM, Paul Barker wrote: I'm building from the dylan branch with: DISTRO = "poky" MACHINE = "beagleboard" PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto = "3.2%" BBLAYERS = " \ .../poky/meta \ .../poky/meta-yocto \ .../poky/meta-yocto-bsp \ .../meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ .../meta

Re: [yocto] CONFIG_HID_APPLE

2013-07-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-07-15 4:46 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 13 July 2013 03:30, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: Can CONFIG_HID_APPLE=m please be added to the kernel defconfigs? Apple keyboards don't work without it. That's not something that most board

Re: [yocto] [meta-yocto][dylan][PATCH] linux-yocto: Fix SRCREVs in linux-yocto_3.2

2013-07-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
and thanks for the boot report. Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield > > Signed-off-by: Paul Barker > --- > meta-yocto-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend | 8 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-yocto-bsp/recipes-kernel/linu

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto fragments meta branch

2013-07-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-07-22 1:12 AM, Sipke Vriend wrote: Hi Bruce, The linux-yocto orphaned meta branch commit 8ef9136539464c145963ac2b8ee0196fea1c2337 .gitignore: do not ignore meta directory causes the linux-yocto targets in meta-xilinx/master to fail with the following error(s): snip --- [ERROR] unable

Re: [yocto] how to set particular changes to a default kernel config

2013-07-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-07-24 09:05 AM, lot...@denx.de wrote: Dear Yocto Team, For an ARM based board (MACHINE = "myboard"), I use a default kernel config from arch/arm/configs and want now to change some particular CONFIG_ options. Trying to follow the documentation, I currently have the following files: . +- l

Re: [yocto] how to set particular changes to a default kernel config

2013-07-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
have fragments, but don't need to use the linux-yocto kernel tree. At the moment, I'll apply the CONFIG_'s with "echo", which seems easier for the simple case. Linux yocto custom is simple, and intended for your use case .. give it a whirl! Bruce BR, L Zitat von Bruc

Re: [yocto] Building linux-yocto kernel in own bsp layer

2013-07-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: > On 07/31/13 10:57, Andrea Adami wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I'm creating my own bsp layer for omap4 chips (Yes, I know of meta-ti, >>> but I want to learn how to do this myself :)). I'm t

Re: [yocto] Building linux-yocto kernel in own bsp layer

2013-08-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-04 5:23 PM, marti...@gmail.com wrote: On 31. juli 2013, at 14:42, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: On 07/31/13 10:57, Andrea Adami wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: Hi. I'm creating my own bsp laye

Re: [yocto] Building linux-yocto kernel in own bsp layer

2013-08-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-07 12:31 PM, marti...@gmail.com wrote: Bruce, have you had the opportunity to look at this yet? I was about to email on this. I was out of the office last week, but was just starting on this last night. Cheers, Bruce - Martin On 5. aug. 2013, at 05:03, Bruce Ashfield wrote

Re: [yocto] Building linux-yocto kernel in own bsp layer

2013-08-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-08 02:04 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: On 08/07/13 19:23, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-08-07 12:31 PM, marti...@gmail.com wrote: Bruce, have you had the opportunity to look at this yet? I was about to email on this. I was out of the office last week, but was just starting on this last

Re: [yocto] Building linux-yocto kernel in own bsp layer

2013-08-10 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-08 8:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-08-08 02:04 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: On 08/07/13 19:23, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-08-07 12:31 PM, marti...@gmail.com wrote: Bruce, have you had the opportunity to look at this yet? I was about to email on this. I was out of the office

Re: [yocto] Building linux-yocto kernel in own bsp layer

2013-08-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
would have been nicely hidden here as well :) It wouldn't hurt other kernels, it would just be ignored. Bruce > > On 11. aug. 2013, at 07:12, Bruce Ashfield > wrote: > >> On 13-08-08 8:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On 13-08-08 02:04 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: &g

Re: [linux-yocto] Integrating with Yocto Build environment

2013-08-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
BA YP toolchain inside the BA?? Regards, Cristian Iorga -Original Message- From: linux-yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org <mailto:linux-yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org> [mailto:linux-yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org <mailto:linux-yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org>

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto defaulting to 3.4.52 for new qemuarmhf.conf

2013-08-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: > >> I created a new qemuarmhf.conf, to build using armv7a vfp and neon. >> >> In the linux-yocto_3.8.bb recipe, I explicitly specified >> SRCREV_machine_qemuarmhf and added qemuarmhf to th

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto defaulting to 3.4.52 for new qemuarmhf.conf

2013-08-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-24 11:32 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: Hi Bruce, On Aug 25, 2013, at 4:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: I created a new qemuarmhf.conf, to build using armv7a vfp and neon. In the linux-yocto_3.8.bb recipe, I explicitly specified SRCREV_machine_qemuarmhf and added qemuarmhf to the list of

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto defaulting to 3.4.52 for new qemuarmhf.conf

2013-08-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-25 10:25 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote: Hi Bruce, On Aug 25, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Bruce Ashfield mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote: Another quick question, why is it that when I create a new qemuarmhf.conf machine configuration, it doesn't automatically pick up the l

Re: [linux-yocto] 3.10 and lttng-modules

2013-08-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-26 7:46 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 19:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-08-26 7:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote: Hi Bruce, The world build for genericx86 tripped over a compilation failure for lttng-modules

Re: [yocto] [meta-virtulization] [PATCH] irqbalance: Uprev to 1.0.6

2013-08-27 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 27 August 2013 09:32:24 David Nyström wrote: >> On Mon 26 Aug 2013 11:27:30 PM CEST, Yang Shi wrote: >> > Add recipe for 1.0.6 version. And, add status and reload commands into >> > init script. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi >

Re: [yocto] How to work with linux-yocto kernel

2013-08-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-28 01:48 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: Hi, I just don't understand how to work with the linux-yocto kernel. For example, I created a local copy of the yocto kernel, and updated the linux-yocto_3.8.bb recipe to point to the local copy (git:///;protocol=file, etc) Then I created a local

Re: [yocto] How to work with linux-yocto kernel

2013-08-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-28 02:05 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: Hi Bruce, On Aug 28, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: There were some old bugs which caused the wrong board description to be picked up, the seems similar. But without seeing your exact changes, as they sit in the tree, I can't be sure.

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-29 11:36 AM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: It appears that the yocto-bsp script generates a kernel configuration that creates some warnings during kern-tools' kconf_check. The {{machine}}.cfg file has many non-hardware options, therefore the script warns. It seems like many of these should

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
uld prevent the specified_non_hdw.cfg warning. It should, unless there's a bug. Can you send me the steps to reproduce the config ? i.e. just your generated BSP layer in a .tgz should be enough. Bruce Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Se

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
eir bucket changed by multiple fragments, the auditing gets harder. I'll do a run with your BSP and let you know what I find. Bruce -Original Message----- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:45 PM To: Jate Sujjavanich Cc: 'yo

Re: [yocto] build stuck at cloning GIT Repo.

2013-08-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-30 02:42 AM, arun kumar wrote: My YOcto Project build, The first build is stuck here -- Loading cache: 100% |###

Re: [yocto] header file missing in populated SDK

2013-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-09-03 04:27 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:05 AM, ChenQi wrote: On 09/02/2013 10:56 PM, Hans Beckérus wrote: Hi. We are having some issues figuring out why one of our header files fails to be installed properly into the SDK. The header file is currently installed usin

Re: [yocto] header file missing in populated SDK

2013-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-09-03 08:46 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-09-03 04:27 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:05 AM, ChenQi wrote: On 09/02/2013 10:56 PM, Hans Beckérus wrote: Hi. We are having some issues figuring out why one of

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >